Dergiler / Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon / 2022 / Volume: 32 Issue: 4

A Hydrophilic/Hydrophobic Composite Structure for Water Harvesting from the Air

Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2022-12-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this case, the water collection rate of the mesh continued to increase.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study is to improve the water harvesting capacity of the traditional wire mesh from the fog by modifying its surface using a nature-inspired composite structure consisting of hydrophilic and hydrophobic zones.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Hydrophilic zones were obtained by electrospinning or electrospraying of the polyamide 6 (PA6) / chitosan (CH) blend, and similarly hydrophobic zones were attained by electrospraying of polycaprolactone (PCL).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this case, the water collection rate of the mesh continued to increase.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:water harvesting · hydrophilic · hydrophobic

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to improve the water harvesting capacity of the traditional wire mesh from the fog by modifying its surface using a nature-inspired composite structure consisting of hydrophilic and hydrophobic zones. Hydrophilic zones were obtained by electrospinning or electrospraying of the polyamide 6 (PA6) / chitosan (CH) blend, and similarly hydrophobic zones were attained by electrospraying of polycaprolactone (PCL). The water harvesting capacity of the resulting meshes was tested and compared with each other. The highest water harvesting capacity was achieved with the PA6/CH nanofiber coated wire mesh as 87 mg / cm2/h. This mesh collected twice as much water compared to the uncoated mesh. However, its water collection rate decreased when nanofiber surface reached the saturation level. The addition of hydrophobic PCL particles onto nanofibers reduced the amount of water captured. In this case, the water collection rate of the mesh continued to increase.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Başal, G., Oral, N. (2022). A Hydrophilic/Hydrophobic Composite Structure for Water Harvesting from the Air. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, Volume: 32 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.1074935

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Claire, S.,2002, The Last Drop. Mazaya Summer Issue, 22–25. 2.
  2. Eslami, M., Tajeddini, F., Etaati, N., 2018, Thermal analysis and optimization of a system for water harvesting from humid air using thermoelectric coolers. Energy Convers. Manag., 174, 417–429.
  3. Alkaisi, A., Mossad, R., Sharifian-Barforoush, A.,2017, A review of the water desalination systems integrated with renewable energy. Energy Proc.,110, 268-274. Park K.C, Chhatre S.S, Srinivasan S., Cohen R.E., McKinley G.H., 2013, Optimal design of permeable fiber network structures for fog harvesting. Langmuir, 29, (43), 13269–13277.
  4. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/five-wild-ways-get-drink-desert-180952845/ (Accessed: 08.07.2021)
  5. Parker, A.R., Lawrence, C.R.,2001, Water capture by a desert beetle. Nature, 414, (6859), 33–34.
  6. Zhai, L., Berg, M.C., Cebeci, F.C., Kim, Y., Milwid, J.M., Rubner, M.F., Cohen, R.E.,2006, Patterned superhydrophobic surfaces: toward a synthetic mimic of the Namib Desert beetle. Nano Lett.,6, 1213–1217.
  7. Huang, Z.X., Liu, X., Wu, J., Wong, S.C., Qu, J.P., 2017, Electrospinning water harvesters inspired by spider silk and beetle. Mater. Lett., 211, 28–31.
  8. Huang, Z.X., Liu, X., Wong, S.C., Qu, J.P.,2019, A single step fabrication of bio-inspired high efficiency and durable water harvester made of polymer membranes. Polymer, 183.
  9. Garrod, R., Harris, L., Schofield, W., McGettrick, J., Ward, L., Teare, D., Badyal, J., 2007, Mimicking a Stenocara Beetle’s back for microcondensation using plasmachemical patterned superhydrophobic superhydrophilic surfaces. Langmuir, 23, (2), 689–693.
  10. Feng, L., Li, S., Li, Y., 2002, Super-hydrophobic Surface: from Natural to Artificial, Advanced Materials, 14(24), 1857–1860
  11. Kenneth, K., S., Lau José Bico Kenneth, B., K., Teo Manish Chhowalla Gehan A. J. Amaratunga William I. Milne Gareth H. McKinley Karen K. Gleason, 2003, Superhydrophobic Carbon Nanotube Forests, Nano Letters, 3, 12, 1701-1705
  12. Ghosh R., Ray T., Ganguly R., 2015, Cooling tower fog harvesting in power plants e A pilot study, Energy, 89, 1018-1028
  13. Knapczyk-Korczak, J., Szewczyk, P. K., Ura, D. P., Berent, K., Stachewicz, U., 2020, Hydrophilic nanofibers in fog collectors for increased water harvesting efficiency, The Royal Society of Chemistry,10, 22335–22342
  14. Nirmala, A., Navamathavan, R., Kang, H.,S., El- Newehyd, M.,H., Kim, H.,Y., 2011, Preparation of polyamide-6/chitosan composite nanofibers by a single solvent system via electrospinning for biomedical applications, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 83, 173–178.
  15. Martinová, L., Lubasová, D., 2008, Electrospun chitosan based nanofibers, RJTA., 12(2), 72-79
  16. Woodruff, M., A., Hutmacher, D., W., 2010, The return of a forgotten polymer Polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Progress in Polymer Science journal, 1217-1256
  17. Knapczyk-Korczak, J., Szewczyk, P. K., Ura, D. P., Berent, K., Stachewicz, U., 2020, Hydrophilic nanofibers in fog collectors for increased water harvesting efficiency, The Royal Society of Chemistry,10, 22335–22342