KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Gıda / 2019 / Cilt: 44 Sayı: 6

PROBİYOTİK KÜLTÜRLERİN MİKROENKAPSÜLASYONUNDA KULLANILAN FARKLI KAPLAMA MATERYALLERİ VE YÖNTEMLER

DIFFERENT COATING MATERIALS AND METHODS USED IN MICROENCAPSULATION OF PROBIOTIC CULTURES

Burak Geniş(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK FAKÜLTESİ, GIDA MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-7204-2176
Yasin Tuncer(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK FAKÜLTESİ, GIDA MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-2075-5027
Dergi
Gıda
Sayfa
1222–1236
Yayın Tarihi
2019-10-06
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

B u derlemede , probiyotik kültürlerin mikro enkapsülasyonunda kullanılan kaplama materyalleri ve mikroenkapsülasyon yöntemleri özetlenmiştir .

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Fonksiyonel gıdaların üretiminde kullanılan probiyotik bakteriler, insan sağlığını destekleme ve sürdürmede önemli rol oynayabilmektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:P robiyotik kültürlerin gıda ortamında ç evre sel koşullardan etkilenmeleri ve canlılıklarını uzun süre koruyamamaları en önemli dezavantaj lar ıdır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:B u derlemede , probiyotik kültürlerin mikro enkapsülasyonunda kullanılan kaplama materyalleri ve mikroenkapsülasyon yöntemleri özetlenmiştir .
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Probiyotik kültür · mikroenkapsülasyon · kaplama materyali

Özet

Fonksiyonel gıdaların üretiminde kullanılan probiyotik bakteriler, insan sağlığını destekleme ve sürdürmede önemli rol oynayabilmektedir. P robiyotik k ültürlerin bu ürünlerde sağladıkları avantajların yanı sıra kullanımlarını sınırlandıran bazı faktörler de bulunmaktadır. P robiyotik kültürlerin gıda ortamında ç evre sel koşullardan etkilenmeleri ve canlılıklarını uzun süre koruyamamaları en önemli dezavantaj lar ıdır. Son yıllarda, probiyotik kültürlere olumsuz çevresel koşullara karşı koymaları için fiziksel bir bariyer oluşturulması sıklıkla uygulanan bir yöntem haline gelmiştir. Probiyotik kültürlerin korunmasına yönelik mikroenkapsülasyon yöntemleri, bu mikroorganizmaların gıda ürünlerinde ve gastrointestinal sistemde canlı kalma oranlarını büyük ölçüde arttırmaktadır. Ek olarak mikroenkapsülasyon probiyotik kültürlerin istenilen zamanda ve bölgede kontrollü salınımı nı sağlayarak kültürün etkinliğini güçlendirmektedir. B u derlemede , probiyotik kültürlerin mikro enkapsülasyonunda kullanılan kaplama materyalleri ve mikroenkapsülasyon yöntemleri özetlenmiştir .

Abstract

Probiotic bacteria used in the production of functional foods may play an important role in the promote and maintenance of human health. In addition to the provide advantages of probiotic cultures in these products, there are some factors that limit their use. The most important disadvantages of probiotic cultures that they are affected by enviromental conditions in food and can not maintain their viability for a long time. In recent years, the creation of physical barrier to counteract adverse enviromental conditions of probiotic cultures has become a frequently applied method. Microencapsulation methods for protection of probiotic cultures greatly increase their survival in food products and gastrointestinal tract. In addition, microencapsulation enhances the efficiency of the culture by providing controlled release of probiotic cultures at the desired time and site. In this review, coating materials and microencapsulation methods used for microencapsulation of probiotic cultures were summarized.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Geniş, B., Tuncer, Y. (2019). PROBİYOTİK KÜLTÜRLERİN MİKROENKAPSÜLASYONUNDA KULLANILAN FARKLI KAPLAMA MATERYALLERİ VE YÖNTEMLER. Gıda, Cilt: 44 Sayı: 6, 1222–1236. https://doi.org/10.15237/gida.GD19087

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (60)

  1. Abd El-Salam, M.H., El-Shibiny, S., (2015). Preparation and properties of milk proteins-based encapsulated probiotics: a review. Dairy Sci Technol, 95: 393–412.
  2. Albadran H.A.,.Chatzifragkou A., Khutoryanskiy V.V., Charalampopoulos D., (2018). Development of surfactant-coated alginate capsules containing Lactobacillus plantarum. Food Hydrocolloids, 82: 490-499
  3. Altun, B., Özcan, T., (2013). Süt Ürünlerinde Probiyotik Bakterilerin Mikroenkapsülasyonu II: Kaplama Materyalleri ve Süt Ürünlerinde Uygulamalar. Uludağ Üniv Ziraat Fak Derg, 27(2): 105–114.
  4. Arepally, D., Goswami, T.K., (2019). Effect of inlet air temperature and gum Arabic concentration on encapsulation of probiotics by spray drying. LWT- Food Sci Technol, 99: 583–593.
  5. Arslan-Tontul, S., Erbas, M., (2017). Single and double layered microencapsulation of probiotics by spray drying and spray chilling. LWT - Food Sci Technol, 81: 160–169.
  6. Atak, Z., Koç, M., Kaymak-Ertekin, F., (2017). Gıda Endüstrisinde Aroma Mikroenkapsülasyonu. Akad Gıda, 15: 416–425.
  7. Azagheswari, Kuriokase, B., Padma, S., Padma Priya, S., (2015). A Review on Microcapsules. Glob J Pharmacol. 9: 28–39.
  8. Başyigit, B., Hayoğlu, I., Atasoy, F., (2017). Kekik Esansiyel Yağı ve Mikroenkapsülasyon Uygulamaları. Batman Üniv Yaşam Bilim Derg 7: 63–70.
  9. Çakır, İ., (2006). Mikroenkapsülasyon Tekniğinin Probiyotik Gıda Üretiminde Kullanımı. Türkiye 9. Gıda Kongresi, 24-26 Mayıs 2006, Bolu, Türkiye, 693-696.
  10. Celli, G.B., Ghanem, A., Brooks, M.S.L., (2015). Bioactive Encapsulated Powders for Functional Foods—a Review of Methods and Current Limitations. Food Bioprocess Technol. 8: 1825–1837.
  11. Chakraborty, S., (2017). Carrageenan for encapsulation and immobilization of flavor, fragrance, probiotics, and enzymes: A review. J Carbohydr Chem, 36: 1–19.
  12. Chen, C., Liu, S., Liu, W., Zhao, Y., Lu, Y., (2012). Synthesis of novel solidliquid phase change materials and electrospinning of ultrafine phase change fibers. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 96: 202–209.
  13. Chen, J., Wang, Q., Liu, C.M., Gong, J., (2017). Issues deserve attention in encapsulating probiotics: Critical review of existing literature. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 57: 1228–1238.
  14. Coghetto, C.C., Brinques, G.B., Ayub, M.A.Z., (2016). Probiotics production and alternative encapsulation methodologies to improve their viabilities under adverse environmental conditions. Int J Food Sci Nutr, 67: 929–943.
  15. De Prisco, A., Mauriello, G., (2016). Probiotication of foods: A focus on microencapsulation tool. Trends Food Sci Technol, 48: 27–39.
  16. De Prisco, A., van Valenberg, H.J.F., Fogliano, V., Mauriello, G., (2017). Microencapsulated Starter Culture During Yoghurt Manufacturing, Effect on Technological Features. Food Bioprocess Technol, 10: 1767–1777.
  17. Desai, K.G.H., ve Park, H.J., (2005). Recent developments in microencapsulation of food ingredients. Drying Technol, 23(7): 1361-1394
  18. Dianawati, D., Mishra, V., Shah, N.P., (2016). Survival of Microencapsulated Probiotic Bacteria after Processing and during Storage: A Review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 56: 1685–1716.
  19. Ðordevic´, V., Balancˇ, B., Belscak-Cvitanovic´, A., Levic´, S., Trifkovic´, K., Kalusevic´, A., Kostic´, I., Komes, D., Bugarski, B., Nedovic, V., (2015). Trends in Encapsulation Technologies for Delivery of Food Bioactive Compounds. Food Eng Rev, 7: 452–490.
  20. Espitia, P.J.P., Batista, R.A., Azeredo, H.M.C., Otoni, C.G., (2016). Probiotics and their potential applications in active edible films and coatings. Food Res Int, 90: 42–52.
  21. Giro-Paloma, J., Martínez, M., Cabeza, L.F., Fernández, A.I., (2016). Types, methods, techniques, and applications for microencapsulated phase change materials (MPCM): A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 53: 1059–1075.
  22. Gökbulut, İ., Öztürk, F.S., 2018. Gıda Mikroenkapsülasyonunda Aljinat Kullanımı. Batman ÜnivYaşam Bilim Derg, 8(1/2), 16–28.
  23. Habibi, H., Khosravi-Darani, K., (2017). Effective variables on production and structure of xanthan gum and its food applications: A review. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol, 10: 130–140.
  24. Heidebach, T., Först, P., Kulozik, U., (2012). Microencapsulation of Probiotic Cells for Food Applications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 52: 291–311.
  25. Huo, X., Li, W., Wang, Y., Han, N., Wang, J., Wang, N., Zhang, X., (2018). Chitosan composite microencapsulated comb-like polymeric phase change material via coacervation microencapsulation. Carbohydr Polym, 200: 602–610.
  26. Kavitake, D., Kandasamy, S., Devi, P.B., Shetty, P.H., (2018). Recent developments on encapsulation of lactic acid bacteria as potential starter culture in fermented foods – A review. Food Biosci, 21: 34–44.
  27. Koç, M., Sakin, M., Ertekin, F.K., (2010). Mikroenkapsülasyon ve Gıda Teknolojisinde Kullanımı. Pamukkale Üniv Müh Bilim. Derg, 16: 77–86.
  28. Kumar, B.V., Venkata, S., Vijayendra, N., (2015). Trends in dairy and non-dairy probiotic products - a review. J Food Sci Technol, 52(10): 6112–6124.
  29. Kumar, R., Chauhan, S.K., Shinde, G., Subramanian, V., Nadanasabapathi, S., (2018). Whey Proteins: A potential ingredient for food industry- A review. Asian J Dairy Food Res, 37: 283–290.
  30. Li, H., Thuy Ho, V.T., Turner, M.S., Dhital, S., (2016). Encapsulation of Lactobacillus plantarum in porous maize starch. LWT - Food Sci Technol, 74: 542–549.
  31. Marcial-Coba, M.S., Knøchel, S., Nielsen, D.S., (2019). Low-moisture food matrices as probiotic carriers. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 366: 1–11.
  32. Martín, M.J., Lara-Villoslada, F., Ruiz, M.A., Morales, M.E., (2015). Microencapsulation of bacteria: A review of different technologies and their impact on the probiotic effects. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol, 27: 15–25.
  33. Mohan, A., Rajendran, S.R.C.K., He, Q.S., Bazinet, L., Udenigwe, C.C., (2015). Encapsulation of food protein hydrolysates and peptides: A review. RSC Adv, 5: 79270–79278.
  34. Öztürk, S., Çakır, İ., (2015). Mikroorganizma Kültürlerinin Korunmasında Kullanılan Kurutma Yöntemleri. Akad Gıda, 13 (1), 94–100.
  35. Pandey, K.R., Vakil, B.V., (2017). Encapsulation of Probiotic Bacillus coagulans for Enhanced Shelf Life. J Appl Biol Biotechnol, 5: 57–65.
  36. Paulo, F., Santos, L., (2017). Design of experiments for microencapsulation applications: A review. Mater Sci Eng C, 77: 1327–1340.
  37. Peanparkdee, M., Iwamoto, S., Yamauchi, R., (2016). Microencapsulation: a Review of Applications in the Food and Pharmaceutical Industries. Rev Agric Sci, 4: 56-65.
  38. Pradeep Prasanna, P.H., Charalampopoulos, D., (2018). Encapsulation in an alginate–goats’ milk–inulin matrix improves survival of probiotic Bifidobacterium in simulated gastrointestinal conditions and goats’ milk yoghurt. Int J Dairy Technol, 72(1): 132-141.
  39. Quintero, J., Rojas, J., Ciro, G., (2018). Vegetable proteins as potential encapsulation agents: a review. Foodresearch, 2(3): 208–220.
  40. Ramani, R., Ramani, V., (2018). Probıotıc Mıcroencapsulatıon Technıques And Coatıng Materıals. Int J Probiotics Prebiotics, 13: 161–168.
  41. Ramos, P.E., Cerqueira, M.A., Teixeira, J.A., Vicente, A.A., (2018). Physiological protection of probiotic microcapsules by coatings. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 58:1864–1877.
  42. Rocha, M.A.M., Coimbra, M.A., Nunes, C., (2017). Applications of chitosan and their derivatives in beverages: a critical review. Curr Opin Food Sci, 15: 61–69.
  43. Roshanzamir, M., Jafari, M., Molaee, E., Ghasemkhani, I., (2017). The survival of probiotic bacteria and sensory properties of yogurt affected by microencapsulation with resistant starch 3. J Food Safe & Hyg, 3(3/4): 59-64.
  44. Sagis, L.M. (2015). Microencapsulation and microspheres for food applications. Academic Press, p.235-248, ISBN 9780128003503
  45. Sarao, L.K., Arora, M., (2017). Probiotics, prebiotics, and microencapsulation: A review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 57: 344–371.
  46. Schuck, P., Jeantet, R., Bhandari, B., Chen, X.D., Perrone, Í.T., de Carvalho, A.F., Fenelon, M., Kelly, P., (2016). Recent advances in spray drying relevant to the dairy industry: A comprehensive critical review. Dry Technol, 34: 1773–1790.
  47. Shaddel, R., Hesari, J., Azadmard-Damirchi, S., Hamishehkar, H., Fathi-Achachlouei, B., Huang, Q., (2018). Use of gelatin and gum Arabic for encapsulation of black raspberry anthocyanins by complex coacervation. Int J Biol Macromol 107: 1800–1810.
  48. Sharif, H.R., Williams, P.A., Sharif, M.K., Abbas, S., Majeed, H., Masamba, K.G., Safdar, W., Zhong, F., (2018). Current progress in the utilization of native and modified legume proteins as emulsifiers and encapsulants – A review. Food Hydrocoll, 76: 2–16.
  49. Shori, A.B., (2017). Microencapsulation Improved Probiotics Survival During Gastric Transit. HAYATI J Biosci, 24: 1–5.
  50. Singh, P., Magalhães, S., Alves, L., Antunes, F., Miguel, M., Lindman, B., Medronho, B., (2019). Cellulose-based edible films for probiotic entrapment. Food Hydrocoll, 88: 68–74.
  51. Soccol, C.R., Prado, M.M.R., Garcia, L.M.B., Rodrigues, C., Medeiros, A.B.P., Soccol, V.T., (2014). Current Developments in Probiotics. J Microb Biochem Technol, 7: 11–20.
  52. Sohail, A., Turner, M.S., Prabawati, E.K., Coombes, A.G.A., Bhandari, B., (2012). Evaluation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM encapsulated using a novel impinging aerosol method in fruit food products. Int J Food Microbiol, 157: 162–166.
  53. Suganya, V., Anuradha, V., (2017). Microencapsulation and Nanoencapsulation: A Review. Int J Pharm Clin Res, 9: 233–239.
  54. Turasan, H., Sahin, S., Sumnu, G., (2015). Encapsulation of rosemary essential oil. LWT - Food Sci Technol, 64: 112–119.
  55. Uran, H., Aloğlu, H., Çetin, B., (2017). Probiyotik bakterilerin mikroenkapsülasyonu Mediterr Agric Sci 30 (2), 107–112.
  56. Varhan, E., Koç, M., (2018). Gıda Bileşenlerinin Sprey Soğutma Yöntemi ile Enkapsülasyonu. Food Health, 4(3): 202–212.
  57. Wang, J., Korber, D.R., Low, N.H., Nickerson, M.T., (2014). Entrapment, survival and release of Bifidobacterium adolescentis within chickpea protein-based microcapsules. Food Res Int, 55: 20–27.
  58. Wang, M., Yang, J., Li, M., Wang, Y., Wu, H., Xiong, L., Sun, Q., (2019). Enhanced viability of layer-by-layer encapsulated Lactobacillus pentosus using chitosan and sodium phytate. Food Chem, 285: 260–265.
  59. Wani, T.A., Shah, A.G., Wani, S.M., Wani, I.A., Masoodi, F.A., Nissar, N., Shagoo, M.A., (2016). Suitability of Different Food Grade Materials for the Encapsulation of Some Functional Foods Well Reported for Their Advantages and Susceptibility. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 56(15), 2431-2454.
  60. Zia, K.M., Tabasum, S., Khan, M.F., Akram, N., Akhter, N., Noreen, A., Zuber, M., (2018). Recent trends on gellan gum blends with natural and synthetic polymers: A review. Int J Biol Macromol, 109: 1068–1087.