KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

Comparing the Phytoremediation Efficiency of Three Different Algae for the Nutrient Removal of Gediz River in Manisa/Turkey

Tuğba ŞENTÜRK
Çisil ÇAMLI
Şükran YILDIZ
Sayfa
737–743
Yayın Tarihi
2017-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

According to the results, the removal efficiency levels for (a) Chlorella sp., measured as PO43- > NO3- > NO2- > NH3-, were 84.47 %, 83.41 %, 6.22 %, 1.79 %, (b) Scenedesmus sp., measured as NO3- > NO2- > NH3- >PO43- , were 97.33 %, 92.92 %, 72.08 %, 56.91 %, and (c) Oscillatoria sp., measured as NH3- > NO3- > PO43- > NO2- , were 90.08 %, 86.76 %, 83.21 %, 0.28 % respectively.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Using bioremediation, in order to break down the pollutants of water systems, is a low cost and ecological friendly approach.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study , three different algal species were used for the bioremediation process of the water samples, collected in 2015 from Gediz River.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to the results, the removal efficiency levels for (a) Chlorella sp., measured as PO43- > NO3- > NO2- > NH3-, were 84.47 %, 83.41 %, 6.22 %, 1.79 %, (b) Scenedesmus sp., measured as NO3- > NO2- > NH3- >PO43- , were 97.33 %, 92.92 %, 72.08 %, 56.91 %, and (c) Oscillatoria sp., measured as NH3- > NO3- > PO43- > NO2- , were 90.08 %, 86.76 %, 83.21 %, 0.28 % respectively.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Adsorption · Chlorella · Nutrient

Abstract

Using bioremediation, in order to break down the pollutants of water systems, is a low cost and ecological friendly approach. Different types of algae are being used in bioremediation processes especially in contaminated waters. Algal species have the ability to use most of the pollutants as food source. Thus, they are desirable organisms for bioremediation process. Studying the bioremediation efficiency levels of different algal species for different types of contaminants is crucial for increasing the effectiveness of this method. In this study , three different algal species were used for the bioremediation process of the water samples, collected in 2015 from Gediz River. In laboratory conditions the removal efficiency of these three algae for various parameters, such as nitrate, nitrite, phosphate and ammonium, were measured. According to the results, the removal efficiency levels for (a) Chlorella sp., measured as PO43- > NO3- > NO2- > NH3-, were 84.47 %, 83.41 %, 6.22 %, 1.79 %, (b) Scenedesmus sp., measured as NO3- > NO2- > NH3- >PO43- , were 97.33 %, 92.92 %, 72.08 %, 56.91 %, and (c) Oscillatoria sp., measured as NH3- > NO3- > PO43- > NO2- , were 90.08 %, 86.76 %, 83.21 %, 0.28 % respectively.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞENTÜRK, T., ÇAMLI, Ç., YILDIZ, Ş. (2017). Comparing the Phytoremediation Efficiency of Three Different Algae for the Nutrient Removal of Gediz River in Manisa/Turkey. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 737–743. https://ajindex.com/articles/110266

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Kshirsagar, A.D. Bioremediation of wastewater by using micro-algae: An experimental study, International Journal of Life Sciences Biotechnology and Pharma Research, 2013, 2(3), 339-346
  2. Vidali, M. Bioremediation: an Overview, Pure and Applied Chemistry, 2001, 73(7), 1163-1172
  3. Kensa, M.V. Bioremediation: an Overview, Journal of Indust-rial Pollution Control, 2001, 27(2), 161-168
  4. Han, S.Q, Zhang, Z.H, Yan, H. Present situation and develop-mental trend of wastewater treatment and eutrophication waters purification with alga technology, Agro Environmental Develop-ment, 2000, 63(1), 13-16
  5. Olguı́, E.J. Phycoremediation: Key Issues for Cost-Effective Nutrient Removal Processes, Biotechnology Advances, 2003, 22(1), 81-91
  6. Dominic, V.J, Murali, S, Nisha, M.C. Phycoremediation Effici-ency of Three Micro Algae Chlorella vulgaris, Synechocystis salina and Gloeocapsa gelatinosa, Academic review, 2009, 16(1), 138-146
  7. Muthukumaran, M, Raghavan, B.G, Subrahmanian, V.V, Si-vasubrahmaniyan, V. Bioremediation of Industrial Effluent Using Micro Algae, Indian Hydrobiology, 2005, 7(1), 105-122
  8. Dwivedi, S. Bioremediation of Heavy Metal by Algae: Current and Future Perspective, Journal of Advanced Laboratory Research in Biology, 2012, 3(3), 195-199
  9. De La Noue, J, Laliberte, G, Proulx, D. Algae and Waste Water, Journal of Applied Phycology, 1992, 4(3), 247-254
  10. De Bashan, L.E, Moreno, M, Hernandez, J.P, Bashan, J. Am-monium and phosphorus removal from continuous and semi-continuous cultures by the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris coimmo-bilized in alginate beads with Azospirillum brasilense, Water Rese-arch, 2002, 36(12), 2941-2948
  11. Kayar, V. N, Çelik, A. Gediz Nehri Kimi Kirlilik Parametreleri-nin Tayini Ve Su Kalitesinin Belirlenmesi., Ekoloji Dergisi, 2003, 12 (47), 17 – 22
  12. Sager, R, Granick, S. Nutritional studies with Chlamydomonas reinhardti., Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1953, 56 (1), 831-838
  13. Rippka, R, Desruelles, J.B, Herdman, M, Stanier, R.Y. Assign-ments strain history and properties of pure cultures of Cyanobacte-ria, Journal General Microbiology, 1979, 111 (2), 1-61
  14. APHA, AWWA, WPCF. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. Washington, 1998, pp 1360
  15. Martinez, M.E, Sánchez, S, Jimenez, J.M, El Yousfi, F, Munoz, L. Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from urban wastewater by the microalga Scenedesmus obliquus, Bioresource technology, 2000, 73(3), 263-272
  16. Zeroual, Y,