KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Öneri Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 20 Sayı: MX Yaratıcı Endüstriler Çalıştayı 2024: Yapay Zeka Çağında Yaratıcı Endüstriler Özel Sayısı Özel Sayı

Oyun Tasarımında Devrim

Revolutionising Game Design

Ali Geriş(MANISA CELAL BAYAR UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-2136-5490
Barış Çukurbaşı(MANISA CELAL BAYAR UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-2856-2676
Can Mıhcı(TRAKYA UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-9393-4619
Çakır Aker(BAHCESEHIR UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-0945-9251
Hamdi Küçük(@OpenPurpose)0009-0003-0446-9578
İsmail Ergen(ISTINYE UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-8847-7262
Oğuz Şentürk(ISTANBUL AYDIN UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-5227-1350
Rahmi Aydemir(ISTANBUL AYDIN UNIVERSITY)0009-0009-3771-7324
Soner Kotan(MARMARA UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-4139-3491
Zeynep Taçgın(MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7827-8238
Abdullah Bal(MARMARA UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-4525-8254
Sayfa
89–113
Yayın Tarihi
2025-04-24
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Ayrıca, YZ'nin oyun geliştirme süreçlerindeki araç ve teknolojilerin etkinliğini değerlendirmekte ve gelecekteki eğilimleri öngörmektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, oyun tasarımında yapay zekanın (YZ) entegrasyonunun kullanıcı arayüzü (UI), kullanıcı deneyimi (UX) ve oyuncu deneyimi (PX) üzerindeki kritik rolünü incelemektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Geleneksel oyun tasarım yaklaşımlarının ötesine geçerek, oyuncuya özel deneyimler sunan dinamik ve etkileşimli oyunlar oluşturulması hedeflenmektedir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ayrıca, YZ'nin oyun geliştirme süreçlerindeki araç ve teknolojilerin etkinliğini değerlendirmekte ve gelecekteki eğilimleri öngörmektedir.
🔬Tür:Derleme
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Yapay zeka · oyun tasarımı · kullanıcı deneyimi

Özet

Bu çalışma, oyun tasarımında yapay zekanın (YZ) entegrasyonunun kullanıcı arayüzü (UI), kullanıcı deneyimi (UX) ve oyuncu deneyimi (PX) üzerindeki kritik rolünü incelemektedir. YZ teknolojilerinin, oyuncu davranışlarına ve tercihlerine uyum sağlayarak oyun ortamlarını devrim niteliğinde değiştirme potansiyeline sahip olduğu vurgulanmaktadır. Geleneksel oyun tasarım yaklaşımlarının ötesine geçerek, oyuncuya özel deneyimler sunan dinamik ve etkileşimli oyunlar oluşturulması hedeflenmektedir. Bu bağlamda, oyun içi yapay zeka bileşenlerinin geliştirilmesi ve uygulanması, oyun tasarımının temellerini yeniden şekillendirmektedir. Bu çalışma, YZ entegrasyonunun UI, UX ve PX üzerindeki etkilerini analiz ederek, oyun tasarımında yeni boyutlar kazandıran ve oyuncu etkileşimini artıran örnekleri ele almaktadır. Ayrıca, YZ'nin oyun geliştirme süreçlerindeki araç ve teknolojilerin etkinliğini değerlendirmekte ve gelecekteki eğilimleri öngörmektedir.

Abstract

This study explores the critical role of artificial intelligence (AI) in contemporary game design, focusing on its influence on user interface (UI), user experience (UX), and player experience (PX). AI technologies have the potential to revolutionise game environments by adapting to individual players' behaviours and preferences, significantly advancing beyond traditional game design paradigms. The evolution from static to adaptive gaming experiences underscores the growing importance of AI in game development, promising new dimensions of engagement and immersion. This paper examines the development and application of AI design components, such as machine learning algorithms, neural networks, and procedural content generation (PCG). It also critically analyses examples of AI integration in games, highlighting instances where AI significantly enhanced gaming experiences and those where it fell short. Additionally, the study underscores AI's transformative potential in crafting next-generation video games, enhancing the user interface and experience. Through an examination of current tools and technologies, critique of AI application in game development, and forecast of AI's future trajectory, this paper provides a comprehensive roadmap for game designers, developers, and players alike.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Geriş, A., Çukurbaşı, B., Mıhcı, C., Aker, Ç., Küçük, H., Ergen, İ., Şentürk, O., Aydemir, R., Kotan, S., Taçgın, Z., Bal, A. (2025). Oyun Tasarımında Devrim. Öneri Dergisi, Cilt: 20 Sayı: MX Yaratıcı Endüstriler Çalıştayı 2024: Yapay Zeka Çağında Yaratıcı Endüstriler Özel Sayısı Özel Sayı, 89–113. https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.1499524

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (80)

  1. Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. I. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7
  2. Abu-Abed, F., & Zhironkin, S. (2023). New game artificial intelligence tools for virtual mine on Unreal Engine. Applied Sciences, 13(10), https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106339
  3. Acovino, V., & Intagliata, C. (2024). “Games made by Soulless Machines”: Tech sparks debate over AI stories in Video Games. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2024/03/15/1238111971/video-games-ai-artificial-intelligence-nvidia
  4. Aker, Ç., Rızvanoğlu, K., & Bostan, B. (2017). Methodological review of playability heuristics. Proc. Eurasia Graph. Istanb. Turk, 405.
  5. Amresh, A., Cooke, N., & Fouse, A. (2023). A Minecraft based simulated task environment for human AI teaming. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. https://doi.org/10.1145/3570945.3607305
  6. An, H., & Kim, J. (2023). Design of a hyper-casual futsal mobile game using a machine-learned ai agent-player. Applied Sciences, 13(4), 2071. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042071
  7. Alarcon, N. 2018. “DLSS: What Does It Mean for Game Developers?” NVIDIA Technical Blog. Retrieved from https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/dlss-what-does-it-mean-for-game-developers/
  8. Heikkilä, M. 2023. “Making an image with generative AI uses as much energy as charging your phone”. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/12/01/1084189/making-an-image-with-generative-ai-uses-as-much-energy-as-charging-your-phone/
  9. Appelcline, S. (2011). Designers & Dragons. Mongoose Publishing.
  10. Bakkes, S., Tan, C. T., & Pisan, Y. (2012, July). Personalised gaming: A motivation and overview of literature. In Proceedings of the 8th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Playing the System (pp. 1-10). https://doi.org/10.1145/2336727.2336731
  11. Assembly, C. (2014). Alien: Isolation. Sega Corp.
  12. Boluk, S., & Lemieux, P. (2017). Metagaming: Playing, competing, spectating, cheating, trading, making, and breaking video games. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt1n2ttjx
  13. Dai, S., Zhu, X., Li, N., Dai, T., & Wang, Z. (2024). Procedural level generation with diffusion models from a single example. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 38(9), 10021-10029. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i9.28865
  14. Delos Santos, J. R. N., & Cornillez, E. E. (2020). Mobile games and academic performance of university students. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9(4), 720-726 https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.A4788.029420
  15. Desurvire, H., Caplan, M., & Toth, J. A. (2004, April). Using heuristics to evaluate the playability of games. In CHI'04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1509-1512). https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986102
  16. Di Cyan, E. (1965). Games people play—The psychology of human relationships. Archives of Internal
  17. Medicine, 116(5), 795-796. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1965.03870050149031
  18. Dillon, R. (2011). The golden age of video games: the birth of a multi-billion dollar industry. Choice (Chicago, Ill.), 49(3), 49–1513. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.49-1513
  19. Dog, N. (1997). Crash Bandicoot 2: Cortex Strikes Back. Sony Interactive Entertainment.
  20. Donkervliet, J., Ron, J., Li, J., Iancu, T., Abad, C., & Iosup, A. (2023). Servo: Increasing the scalability of modifiable virtual environments using serverless computing. 2023 IEEE 43rd International Conference on
  21. Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), 829-840. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCS57875.2023.00075
  22. Ermi, L., & Mäyrä, F. (2005, June). Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: Analysing immersion. In DiGRA Conference (pp. 7-8).
  23. Federoff, M. A. (2002). Heuristics and usability guidelines for the creation and evaluation of fun in video games. Master of Science in the Department of Telecommunications of Indiana University.
  24. Games, F. (2015). Soma. Frictional Games: Helsingborg.
  25. Gunawan, L., Marlim, B., Sutrisno, N., Yulistiani, R., & Purnomo, F. (2022). Analyzing AI and the impact in video games. 2022 4th International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System (ICORIS), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORIS56080.2022.10031590
  26. Hamari, J., & Keronen, L. (2017). Why do people play games? A meta-analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.01.006
  27. Hamari, J., Keronen, L., & Alha, K. (2015, January). Why do people play games? A review of studies on adoption and use. In 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3559-3568). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.428
  28. Henrik, Warpefelt., Christoph, Salge., Mirjam, Palosaari, Eladhari., Magy, Seif, El-Nasr., Jichen, Zhu. (2022).
  29. Guest Editorial Special Issue on User Experience of AI in Games. IEEE Transactions on Games, 14(4), 539-542. https://doi.org/10.1109/tg.2022.3225731
  30. Hooshyar, D., Yousefi, M., & Lim, H. (2018). Data-driven approaches to game player modeling: A systematic literature review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50(6), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3145814 Ijsselsteijn, W., Nap, H. H., de Kort, Y., & Poels, K. (2007, November). Digital game design for elderly users. In
  31. Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Future Play (pp. 17-22). https://doi.org/10.1145/1328202.1328206
  32. Inie, N., Falk, J., & Tanimoto, S. (2023). Designing participatory AI: Creative professionals’ worries and expectations about generative AI. Paper presented at the Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585657
  33. Ionescu, D., Islam, S., Gadea, C., Ionescu, B., McQuiggan, E., & Trifan, M. (2010). An AI based solution for the control of 3D real-time sensor based gaming. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Virtual Environments,
  34. Human-Computer Interfaces and Measurement Systems, 23-27. https://doi.org/10.1109/VECIMS.2010.5609362
  35. Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/S42256-019-0088-2
  36. Kahn, A. S., Shen, C., Lu, L., Ratan, R., Coary, S. P., Hou, J., Meng, J., Osborn, J. C., & Williams, D. (2015). The trojan player typology: A cross-genre, cross-cultural, behaviorally validated scale of video game play motivations. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.018
  37. Keiper, M. C., Fried, G., Lupinek, J., & Nordstrom, H. (2023). Artificial intelligence in sport management education: Playing the AI game with ChatGPT. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 33, 100456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2023.100456
  38. Korhonen, H., & Koivisto, E. M. (2006, September). Playability heuristics for mobile games. In Proceedings of the 8th conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services (pp. 9-16). https://doi.org/10.1145/1152215.1152218
  39. Lan, Y. (2023). Development and Application of 3D Modeling in Game. Academic Journal of Science and Technology.
  40. Levytskyi, V., Tsiutsiura, M., Yerukaiev, A., Rusan, N., & Li, T. (2023). The Working Principle of Artificial Intelligence in Video Games. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST), 246-250. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIST58284.2023.10223491
  41. Li, Y., & Xu, D. (2016). A game AI based on ID3 algorithm. 2016 2nd International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I), 681-687. https://doi.org/10.54097/ajst.v7i2.11949
  42. Liang, W., Yu, C., Whiteaker, B., Huh, I., Shao, H., & Liang, Y. (2023). Mastering Gomoku with AlphaZero: A study in advanced AI game strategy. Sage Science Review of Applied Machine Learning, 6(11), 32-43. Retrieved from https://journals.sagescience.org/index.php/ssraml/article/view/115
  43. Lucas, S. M., Mateas, M., Preuss, M., Spronck, P., & Togelius, J. (2013). Artificial and computational intelligence in games (Vol. 6). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. https://doi.org/10.4230/DagRep.2.5.43
  44. Mahajan, A. (2023). What is Gen AI: Decoding the ultimate future of marketing creativity. Retrieved from https://trendvisionz.com/featured/what-is-gen-ai-decoding-future-marketing-creativity/
  45. Mariselvam, J., Rajendran, S., & Alotaibi, Y. (2023). Reinforcement learning-based AI assistant and VR play therapy game for children with Down syndrome bound to wheelchairs. AIMS Mathematics, 8(7), 16989-17011.
  46. Medlock, M. C. (2018). An overview of gur methods. Games User Research.
  47. McFarland, A. (2024). Best of 10 Best AI Game Generators. Retrieved from https://www.unite.ai/best-ai-game-generators/
  48. Melhart, D., Togelius, J., Mikkelsen, B., Holmgård, C., & Yannakakis, G. N. (2023). The ethics of AI in games. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 15(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2023.3276425
  49. Menapace, W., Siarohin, A., Lathuilière, S., Achlioptas, P., Golyanik, V., Ricci, E., & Tulyakov, S. (2023). Promptable game models: Text-guided game simulation via masked diffusion models. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 43(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3635705
  50. Nelson, C. (2024). Field guide to Meta-Architecture. ACADIA 2022. Retrieved from https://papers.cumincad.org/data/works/att/acadia22_294.pdf
  51. O’Neil, C. (2020). AI, ethics, and the law. In: Skidelsky, R., Craig, N. (eds) Work in the Future. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21134-9_15
  52. Patrick, Jagoda. (2023). Artificial intelligence in video games. American Literature, 95(2), 435-438, https://doi.org/10.1215/00029831-10575246
  53. Patzer, B., Chaparro, B., & Keebler, J. R. (2020). Developing a model of video game play: Motivations, satisfactions, and continuance intentions. Simulation & Gaming, 51(3), 287-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878120903352
  54. Pfau, J., Smeddinck, J. D., & Malaka, R. (2018, October). Towards deep player behavior models in mmorpgs. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 381-392). https://doi.org/10.1145/3242671.3242706
  55. Phan, M. H., Keebler, J. R., & Chaparro, B. S. (2016). The development and validation of the game user experience satisfaction scale (GUESS). Human Factors, 58(8), 1217-1247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816669646
  56. Prakash, E., Brindle, G., Jones, K., Zhou, S., Chaudhari, N., & Wong, K. W. (2009). Advances in games technology: Software, models, and intelligence. Simulation & Gaming, 40, 752-801. https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781093351
  57. Rath, T., & Preethi, N. (2021). Application of AI in video games to improve game building. 2021 10th IEEE International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT), 821-824. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSNT51715.2021.9509685
  58. Ratican, J., Hutson, J., & Wright, A. (2023). A proposed meta-reality immersive development pipeline: Generative AI models and extended reality (XR) content for the metaverse. Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications, 15, 24-35. https://doi.org/10.4236/jilsa.2023.151002
  59. Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 344-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8 Sadler, D. (2023). AI startup 'magically' generating 3D images was actually using humans. Australian Computer Society. Retrieved from https://ia.acs.org.au/article/2023/ai-startup--magically--generating-3d-images-was-actually-using-humans.html
  60. Schulze, E. (2019). 40% of A.I. start-ups in Europe have almost nothing to do with A.I., research finds. CNBC. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/06/40-percent-of-ai-start-ups-in-europe-not-related-to-ai-mmc report.html#:~:text=40%25%20of%20A.I.-,start%2Dups%20in%20Europe%20have%20almost%20nothing,do%20with%20A.I.%2C%20research%20finds&text=A%20new%20report%20from%20London,Europe’s%202%2C830%20AI%20start%2Dups
  61. Singh, L. (2023). Top 10 Generative AI Applications Use Cases & Examples. Retrieved from https://redblink.com/generative-ai-applications-use-cases/
  62. Spiel, K., & Gerling, K. (2021). The purpose of play: How HCI games research fails neurodivergent populations. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 28(2), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432245
  63. Srivastava, Sudeep. 2023. “How AI in Gaming is Redefining the Future of the Industry”. Appinventiv. Retrieved from https://appinventiv.com/blog/ai-in-gaming/
  64. Sun, M., Jiang, G., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Covariance matrix adaptation MAP-Elites for video game level generation. International Conference on Computer Graphics, Artificial Intelligence, and Data Processing (ICCAID 2023), 1310533 (27 March 2024). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3026544
  65. Tacgin, Z. (2020). Virtual and Augmented Reality: An Educational Handbook: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  66. Tang, Y. M., & Ho, H. L. (2020). 3D modeling and computer graphics in virtual reality. In mixed reality and three-dimensional computer graphics. IntechOpen.
  67. Taveekitworachai, P., Abdullah, F., Dewantoro, M. F., Thawonmas, R., Togelius, J., & Renz, J. (2024). The 1st ChatGPT4PCG Competition. IEEE Transactions on Games (pp. 1-17). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TG.2024.3376429
  68. Touretzky, D., Gardner-McCune, C., & Seehorn, D. (2023). Machine learning and the five big ideas in AI. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33(2), 233-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00314-1
  69. Valve. (2008) Left 4 Dead. Valve Corporation: Bellevue, WA.
  70. van den Herik, H. J., Donkers, H. H. L. M., & Spronck, P. H. (2005). Opponent modelling and commercial games. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2005 symposium on computational intelligence and games: CIG'05, April 4-6, 2005, Essex University, Colchester, Essex, UK (pp. 15-25). Essex University.
  71. Wegner. K, Seele. S, Buhler. H, Misztal. S, Herpers. R, Schild. J. (2017). Comparison of two inventory design concepts in a collaborative virtual reality serious game. CHI PLAY '17 Extended Abstracts: Extended Abstracts Publication of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 323-329. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130859.3131300
  72. Westera, W., Prada, R., Mascarenhas, S., Santos, P. A., Dias, J., Guimarães, M., Georgiadis, K., Nyamsuren, E., Bahreini, K., Yumak, Z., Christyowidiasmoro, C., Dascalu, M., Gutu-Robu, G., & Ruseti, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence moving serious gaming: Presenting reusable game AI components. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 351-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09968-2
  73. Wilde, T. (2023). Myst creator defends its use of 'AI assisted content' in latest game (updated). PC Gamer. Retrieved from https://www.pcgamer.com/firmament-ai-generated-content/
  74. Yannakakis, G. N., & Hallam, J. (2004). Evolving opponents for interesting interactive computer games. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3122.003.0062
  75. Yannakakis, G. N., & Togelius, J. (2018). Artificial intelligence and games (Vol. 2): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63519-4
  76. Yannakakis, G. N., Spronck, P., Loiacono, D., & André, E. (2013). Player modeling. Retrieved from https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/29725
  77. Ye, D., Chen, G., Zhang, W., Chen, S., Yuan, B., Liu, B., Chen, J., Liu, Z., Qui, F., Yu, H., Yin, Y., Shi, B., Wang, L., Shi, T., Fu, Q., Yang, W., & Huang, L. (2020). Towards playing full MOBA games with deep reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 621-632.
  78. Yin-Poole, W. (2014, June 24). DICE ponders: What did people really like about Battlefield: Bad Company? Eurogamer.net. https://www.eurogamer.net/dice-ponders-what-did-people-really-like-about-battlefield-bad-company
  79. Zhu, J., & Ontañón, S. (2020, September). Player-centered AI for automatic game personalization: Open problems. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (pp. 1-8).
  80. Zolotarenko, J. (2024, January 31). Palworld under fire: AI controversy. Medium. https://hitberrygames.medium.com/palworld-ai-controversy-and-pok%C3%A9mon-plagiarism-accusations-8dad963c6fa6