KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2

Investigation of Uranium Adsorption Behavior of Al-Doped ZnO/PVDF Nanofibers Using Response Surface Methodology

İkbal Gözde Kaptanoğlu(Ege Üniversitesi, Nükleer Bilimler Enstitüsü, Nükleer Teknoloji ABD)0000-0002-3852-9853
Sayfa
302–308
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These findings demonstrate that electrospun Al:ZnO/PVDF nanofiber composites are promising adsorbents for uranium remediation and emphasize the effectiveness of RSM for adsorption process optimization.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, aluminum-doped zinc oxide (Al:ZnO)/poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) composite nanofibers were synthesized via electrospinning and evaluated as adsorbents for U(VI) removal.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The quadratic model developed through RSM exhibited an excellent coefficient of determination (R² = 0.9846), confirming a strong correlation between experimental and predicted values.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These findings demonstrate that electrospun Al:ZnO/PVDF nanofiber composites are promising adsorbents for uranium remediation and emphasize the effectiveness of RSM for adsorption process optimization.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Adsorption · Nanofiber · Response Surface Methodology

Abstract

In this study, aluminum-doped zinc oxide (Al:ZnO)/poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) composite nanofibers were synthesized via electrospinning and evaluated as adsorbents for U(VI) removal. The adsorption process was optimized using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) based on a Central Composite Design (CCD). The effects of key parameters were systematically investigated. The quadratic model developed through RSM exhibited an excellent coefficient of determination (R² = 0.9846), confirming a strong correlation between experimental and predicted values. The results indicated that pH and initial uranium concentration significantly influenced adsorption efficiency. Optimal conditions were identified at pH 5.26, temperature 59.1 °C, an initial U(VI) concentration of 124.7 mg L -1 , and an adsorbent dosage of 0.0025 g. Under these conditions, the maximum experimental adsorption capacity reached 132.7 mg/g. The adsorption behavior followed the Langmuir isotherm model, suggesting monolayer adsorption on homogeneous sites with a theoretical maximum capacity of 138.5 mg g -1 , which is in close agreement with the experimental value. Thermodynamic parameters revealed that the process was spontaneous and endothermic. These findings demonstrate that electrospun Al:ZnO/PVDF nanofiber composites are promising adsorbents for uranium remediation and emphasize the effectiveness of RSM for adsorption process optimization.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kaptanoğlu, İ. G. (2026). Investigation of Uranium Adsorption Behavior of Al-Doped ZnO/PVDF Nanofibers Using Response Surface Methodology. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2, 302–308. https://doi.org/10.18466/cbayarfbe.1868526

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (23)

  1. . Liu D, Wang Y, Zuo L, et al. Advanced materials for uranium adsorption: a mini review of recent developments. Front Mater [Internet]. 2025;12:1541204.
  2. . Bhardwaj N, Kundu SC. Electrospinning: A fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnol Adv [Internet]. 2010;28(3):325–347.
  3. . Cozza ES, Monticelli O, Marsano E, et al. On the electrospinning of PVDF: influence of the experimental conditions on the nanofiber properties. Polym Int [Internet]. 2013;62(1):41–48.
  4. . Xie S, Liu X, Zhang B, et al. Electrospun nanofibrous adsorbents for uranium extraction from seawater. J Mater Chem A Mater [Internet]. 2015;3(6):2552–2558.
  5. . Bootchanont A, Porjai P, Noonuruk R, et al. Piezoelectric enhanced photocatalytic properties of PVDF–ZnO/Cu nanofibers prepared by electrospinning technique. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Materials [Internet]. 2022;61(17):1924–1932.
  6. . Akpomie KG, Conradie J, Adegoke KA, et al. Adsorption mechanism and modeling of radionuclides and heavy metals onto ZnO nanoparticles: a review. Appl Water Sci [Internet]. 2023;13(1):20.
  7. . Khezami L, Modwi A, Ghiloufi I, et al. Effect of aluminum loading on structural and morphological characteristics of ZnO nanoparticles for heavy metal ion elimination. Environmental Science and Pollution Research [Internet]. 2020;27(3):3086–3099.
  8. . Jawed A, Pandey LM. Application of bimetallic Al-doped ZnO nano-assembly for heavy metal removal and decontamination of wastewater. Water Science and Technology [Internet]. 2019;80(11):2067–2078.
  9. . Kaynar ÜH, Çınar S, Çam Kaynar S, et al. Modelling and optimization of uranium (VI) ions adsorption onto nano-ZnO/chitosan bio-composite beads with response surface methodology (RSM). J Polym Environ. 2018;26(6):2300–2310.
  10. . Sharma S, Malik A, Satya S. Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of nutrient supplementation for Cr (VI) removal by Aspergillus lentulus AML05. J Hazard Mater. 2009;164(2–3):1198–1204.
  11. . Kaptanoglu IG, Yusan S, Kaynar UH, et al. Investigation of thorium(IV) removal utilizing reduced graphene oxide-zinc oxide nanofibers via response surface methodology. J Radioanal Nucl Chem [Internet]. 2025;1–14.
  12. . Sun X, Luo W, Chen L, et al. Synthesis of porous Al doped ZnO nanosheets with high adsorption and photodecolorizative activity and the key role of Al doping for methyl orange removal. RSC Adv [Internet]. 2016;6(3):2241–2251.
  13. . Hallaji H, Keshtkar AR, Moosavian MA. A novel electrospun PVA/ZnO nanofiber adsorbent for U(VI), Cu(II) and Ni(II) removal from aqueous solution. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng [Internet]. 2015;46:109–118.
  14. . Dong W, Zhao Z, Liu F, et al. PVDF Nanofiber Modified with ZnO Nanowires/Polydopamine for the Treatment of Sewage Containing Heavy Metals, Organic Dyes, and Bacteria. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces [Internet]. 2023;15(50):58994–59004.
  15. . Kaptanoglu IG, Kaynar UH, Yusan S. Adsorption of Uranium(VI) ions by nano Cu-doped ZrO₂: A response surface methodology approach. Ceram Int [Internet]. 2025;51(14):19258–19266.
  16. . Endes Yılmaz C, Nostar Aslan E, Aslani MAA, et al. Hydrothermal synthesis of novel activated carbon–nickel oxide nanocomposites for uranium adsorption. J Radioanal Nucl Chem [Internet]. 2023;332(11):4791–4805.
  17. . Kaynar UH, Çam Kaynar S, Ekdal Karali E, et al. Adsorption of thorium (IV) ions by metal ion doped ZnO nanomaterial prepared with combustion synthesis: Empirical modelling and process optimization by response surface methodology (RSM). Applied Radiation and Isotopes [Internet]. 2021;178:109955.
  18. . Langmuir I. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J Am Chem Soc. 1918;40(9):1361–1403.
  19. . Freundlich HMF. Over the adsorption in solution. J Phys chem. 1906;57(385471):1100–1107.
  20. . Zhou H, Xie Y, Wang X, et al. Efficient removal of uranium in aqueous solution by Al-doped hydroxyapatite: Static/dynamic adsorption behaviors and mechanism study. Environ Technol Innov [Internet]. 2022;25:102103.
  21. . Milonjic S. A consideration of the correct calculation of thermodynamic parameters of adsorption. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society [Internet]. 2007;72(12):1363–1367.
  22. . Zhang L, Zhang L, Wu T, et al. In situ growth of ZnO nanorod arrays on cotton cloth for the removal of uranium. RSC Adv [Internet]. 2015;5(66):53433–53440.
  23. . Ilaiyaraja P, Deb AKS, Sivasubramanian K, et al. Removal of thorium from aqueous solution by adsorption using PAMAM dendron-functionalized styrene divinyl benzene. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2013;297(1):59–69.