Dergiler / European Journal of Biology / 2026 / Volume: 85 Issue: 2

Investigation of the Effect of Antibiotic Resistance Selected via Disk Diffusion and Cross-Resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae on Biofilm Formation

Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-12
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Future molecular characterisation of β-lactamase and biofilm-associated genes are essential for elucidating the underlying mechanisms.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Antibiotic resistance has become a global health issue, making it difficult to manage treatable infections.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study aimed to investigate the development of resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae exposure to antibiotic diffusion gradients generated by disk diffusion.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Future molecular characterisation of β-lactamase and biofilm-associated genes are essential for elucidating the underlying mechanisms.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Klebsiella pneumoniae · Antibiotic resistance · Resistant mutant selection

Abstract

Objective: Antibiotic resistance has become a global health issue, making it difficult to manage treatable infections. This study aimed to investigate the development of resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae exposure to antibiotic diffusion gradients generated by disk diffusion. The emergence of cross-resistance and the impact of this resistance on biofilm formation are further evaluated. Materials and Methods: K. pneumoniae was exposed to antibiotic diffusion gradients using Oxoid disks (36 µg) to select resistant mutants of piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), leading to the development of a resistant strain (P₃). Comparative analyses of antibiotic susceptibility (TZP, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid [AMC], cefixime [CFM], and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [SXT]) and biofilm formation were conducted between the parental (P₀) and resistant (P₃) strains. Biofilm production was evaluated under varying temperatures (37°C and 45°C) and glucose concentrations (0%-2.5%). Results: Resistance to TZP increased significantly in P₃, with moderate cross-resistance observed against AMC and SXT (p<0.05). Although the strain was susceptible to most antibiotics at baseline (P0), it exhibited primary resistance to CFM in both P0 and P3 stages. Biofilm formation was higher at 37°C than at 45°C under the tested conditions. Increasing the glucose concentration from 0 % to 2.5% reduced biofilm production by nearly 40%. However, no direct correlation was found between antibiotic resistance development and biofilm-forming capacity. Conclusion: Selection through antibiotic gradients can induce resistance and cross-resistance in K. pneumoniae , but does not necessarily enhance biofilm production. Environmental parameters, particularly temperature and nutrient availability, and particularly glucose concentration, are more influential in modulating biofilm formation. Future molecular characterisation of β-lactamase and biofilm-associated genes are essential for elucidating the underlying mechanisms.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Bidollahkhani, M., Altuner, E. M. (2026). Investigation of the Effect of Antibiotic Resistance Selected via Disk Diffusion and Cross-Resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae on Biofilm Formation. European Journal of Biology, Volume: 85 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.26650/EurJBiol.2026.1712596

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (37)

  1. Zhang LY, Tian B, Huang YH, et al. Classification and prediction of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains with different MLST allelic profiles via SERS spectral analysis. PeerJ. 2023;11:e16161. doi:10.7717/peerj.16161 google scholar
  2. Carabarin-Lima A, León-Izurieta L, Rocha-Gracia RDC, et al. First evidence of polar flagella in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from a patient with neonatal sepsis. J Med Microbiol. 2016;65:729-737. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.000291 google scholar
  3. Calderon-Gonzalez R, Lee A, Lopez-Campos G, et al. Modelling the gastrointestinal carriage of Klebsiella pneumoniae infections. Mbio. 2023;14:e03121-22. doi:10.1128/mbio.03121-22 google scholar
  4. Paczosa MK, Mecsas J. Klebsiella pneumoniae: Going on the offense with a strong defense. Microbiol Mol Biol R. 2016;80:629-661. doi:10.1128/ mmbr.00078-15 google scholar
  5. Li Y, Kumar S, Zhang L. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance and developments in therapeutic strategies to combat Klebsiella pneumoniae infection. Infect Drug Resist. 2024;17:1107-1119. doi:10.2147/IDR.S453025 google scholar
  6. Liu C, Wu Y, Zhang Y, et al. Effectiveness of antimicrobial agent combinations against carbapenem-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae with KPC variants in China. Front Microbiol. 2025;15:1519319. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1519319 google scholar
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Research Group. Healthcare Facilities: Information about CRE. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs). https://www.cdc.gov/hai/organisms/ klebsiella/klebsiella.html. Accessed April 29, 2025. google scholar
  8. Li Y, Kumar S, Zhang L, Wu H, Wu H. Characteristics of antibiotic resistance mechanisms and genes of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Open Med. 2023;18. doi:10.1515/med-2023-0707 google scholar
  9. Zhang F, Cheng W. The mechanism of bacterial resistance and potential bacteriostatic strategies. Antibiot. 2022;11:1215. doi:10.3390/antibiotics11091215 google scholar
  10. Qi L, Li H, Zhang C, et al. Relationship between antibiotic resistance, biofilm formation, and biofilm-specific resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:483. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00483 google scholar
  11. Li L, Gao X, Li M, et al. Relationship between biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae and updates on antibiofilm therapeutic strategies. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024;14:1324895. doi:10.3389/ fcimb.2024.1324895 google scholar
  12. Altuner EM, Akata I, Canlı K. In vitro antimicrobial activity screening of Bovista nigrescens Pers. Kastamonu Univ J Forestry Faculty. 2012;12(1):90-96. google scholar
  13. Canli K, Yetgin A, Akata I, Altuner EM. In vitro antimicrobial activity of Angelica sylvestris roots. Int J Biol Sci. 2016;1(1):1-7. google scholar
  14. Canli K, Yetgin A, Akata I, Altuner EM. In vitro antimicrobial activity screening of Rheum rhabarbarum roots. Int J Pharm Sci Invent. 2016;5(2):01-04. google scholar
  15. Hudzicki J. Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test protocol. Am Soc Microbiol. 2009;15(1), 1-23. google scholar
  16. Tzeng YL, Berman Z, Toh E, et al. Heteroresistance to the model antimicrobial peptide polymyxin B in the emerging Neisseria meningitidis lineage 11.2 urethritis clade: mutations in the pilMNOPQ operon. Mol Microbiol. 2019;111(1), 254-268. doi:10.1111/mmi.14153 google scholar
  17. Zurnaci M, Senturan M, Sener N, et al. Studies on antimicrobial, antibiofilm, efflux pump inhibiting, and ADMET properties of newly synthesised 1, 3, 4‐thiadiazole derivatives. ChemistrySelect. 2021;6(45):12571-12581. doi:10.1002/ slct.202103214. google scholar
  18. Barnett V, Lewis T. Outliers in Statistical Data. 3rd Edition. 1994. John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
  19. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th Edition. 2013. Pearson Education google scholar
  20. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters (Version 8.1). http://www.eucast.org. Published 2018. google scholar
  21. Esener AA, Roels JA, Kossen NWF. The influence of temperature on the energetics of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1983;25:2093-2098. doi:10.1002/bit.260250819 google scholar
  22. Müller JU, Schwabe M, Swiatek LS, et al. Temperatures above 37° C increase virulence of a convergent Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 307 strain. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024; 14:1411286. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2024.1411286 google scholar
  23. Gual-de-Torrella A, Delgado-Valverde M, et al. Prevalence of the fimbrial operon mrkABCD, mrkA expression, biofilm formation and effect of biocides on biofilm formation in carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates belonging or not belonging to high-risk clones. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2022;60(4):106663. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2022.106663 google scholar
  24. Alabdullatif M. Evaluating the effects of temperature and agitation on biofilm formation of bacterial pathogens isolated from raw cow milk. BMC Microbiol. 2024 8;24(1):251. doi:10.1186/s12866-024-03403-4 google scholar
  25. Ramakrishnan R, Nair AV, Parmar K, Rajmani RS, Chakravortty D, Das D. Combating biofilm-associated Klebsiella pneumoniae infections using a bovine microbial enzyme. NPJ Biofilms Microbiom. 2024;10(1):119. doi:10.1038/ s41522-024-00593-7 google scholar
  26. Li Y, Ni M. Regulation of biofilm formation in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1238482. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1238482 google scholar
  27. Panjaitan NS, Po-Chi S, Yin-Jia L, Yi-Jhen T. High glucose ınhibits the expression of EtcABC which resulted in negative regulation of type ııı fimbriae in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. In1st International Conference for Health Research–BRIN (ICHR 2022) 2023 (pp. 125-135). Atlantis Press. google scholar
  28. Guerra MES, Destro G, Vieira B, et al. Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilms and their role in disease pathogenesis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:877995. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2022.877995 google scholar
  29. Jackson DW, Simecka JW, Romeo T. Catabolite repression of Escherichia coli biofilm formation. J Bacteriol. 2002 15;184(12):3406-3410. doi:10.1128/ jb.184.12.3406-3410.2002 google scholar
  30. Zhang Y, Cai Y, Zhang B, Zhang YH. Spatially structured exchange of metabolites enhances bacterial survival and resilience in biofilms. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):7575. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51940-3 google scholar
  31. dos Santos Goncalves M, Delattre C, Balestrino D, et al. Anti-biofilm activity: A function of Klebsiella pneumoniae capsular polysaccharide. PLoS One. 2014;9:e99995. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099995 google scholar
  32. Vuotto C, Longo F, Balice MP, Donelli G, Varaldo PE. Antibiotic resistance related to biofilm formation in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Pathogens. 2014;3:743-758. doi:10.3390/pathogens3030743 google scholar
  33. Vuotto C, Longo F, Pascolini C, et al. Biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae urinary strains. J Appl Microbiol. 2017;123:1003-1018. doi:10.1111/jam.13533 google scholar
  34. Prinzi A, Rohde R. The role of bacterial biofilms in antimicrobial resistance. American Society for Microbiology. 2023. https://asm.org/articles/2023/march/ the-role-of-bacterial-biofilms-in-antimicrobial-re google scholar
  35. Hjort K, Fermér E, Tang PC, Andersson DI. Antibiotic minimal selective concentrations and fitness costs during biofilm and planktonic growth. MBio. 2022;13(3):e01447-22 doi:10.1128/mbio.01447-22 google scholar
  36. Alshaikh SA, El-Banna T, Sonbol F, Farghali MH. Correlation between antimicrobial resistance, biofilm formation, and virulence determinants in uropathogenic Escherichia coli from Egyptian hospital. Ann Clin Microb Anti. 2024;23(1):20. doi:10.1186/s12941-024-00679-2 google scholar
  37. Singh S, Datta S, Narayanan KB, Rajnish KN. Bacterial exo-polysaccharides in biofilms: role in antimicrobial resistance and treatments. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2021;19(1):140. doi:10.1186/s43141-021-00242-y google scholar