KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4

TR90 Bölgesinde Ekonomik Büyüme ve Enerji Tüketiminin Çevre Kirliliğine Etkisinin Araştırılması: MMQR Yaklaşımından Bir Bakış

Exploring the Impact of Economic Growth and Energy Consumption on Environmental Pollution in the TR90 Region: An Insight from the MMQR Approach

Vildan Yavuz Akinci(RECEP TAYYİP ERDOĞAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3232-8265
Korkmaz Yıldırım(Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Universitesi)0000-0001-5427-5075
Tunahan Hacıimamoğlu(RECEP TAYYİP ERDOĞAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1474-8506
Sayfa
743–762
Yayın Tarihi
2024-12-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Ayrıca, sonuçlar artan enerji tüketiminin TR90 bölgesinde çevre kirliliğini olumsuz şekilde etkilediğini göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Hükümetler öncelikli olarak çevresel kaygıları ekonomik büyümeyle dengelemekten kaynaklanan temel açmazlarla karşı karşıyadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu konuda çoğu araştırma ülke veya ülke grupları vakalarına odaklandığından, ekonomik büyümenin ve enerji tüketiminin bölgesel veya il düzeyinde çevre kirliliği süreçlerini nasıl etkilediği konusunda önemli bir bilimsel boşluk vardır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ayrıca, sonuçlar artan enerji tüketiminin TR90 bölgesinde çevre kirliliğini olumsuz şekilde etkilediğini göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2007-2021 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma · Çevre Kirliliği · Enerji Tüketimi

Özet

Hükümetler öncelikli olarak çevresel kaygıları ekonomik büyümeyle dengelemekten kaynaklanan temel açmazlarla karşı karşıyadır. Bu konuda çoğu araştırma ülke veya ülke grupları vakalarına odaklandığından, ekonomik büyümenin ve enerji tüketiminin bölgesel veya il düzeyinde çevre kirliliği süreçlerini nasıl etkilediği konusunda önemli bir bilimsel boşluk vardır. Bu çalışma, 2007-2021 yılları arasında Türkiye'nin TR90 bölgesinde (Artvin, Giresun, Gümüşhane, Ordu, Rize ve Trabzon illerini kapsayan) enerji tüketimi ve ekonomik büyümenin çevre kirliliği üzerindeki etkilerini Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi (EKC) hipotezi çerçevesinde araştıran ilk çalışmadır. Bu çalışma, bu minvalde yeni Momentler Kantil Regresyonu Yöntemi (MMQR) yaklaşımı kullanmaktadır. MMQR sonuçları, çevre kirliliğinin ekonomik büyümenin erken evrelerinde arttığını ancak büyüme seviyeleri bir dönüm noktasına ulaştığında azalmaya başladığını ileri süren EKC hipotezini desteklemektedir. Ayrıca, sonuçlar artan enerji tüketiminin TR90 bölgesinde çevre kirliliğini olumsuz şekilde etkilediğini göstermektedir.

Abstract

Governments primarily face the basic conundrums that arise from balancing environmental concerns with economic growth. In this content, since most research focuses on the cases of countries or groups of countries, a significant gap exists in how economic growth and energy consumption influence environmental pollution processes at the regional or provincial level. This study is the first to investigate the effects of energy consumption and economic growth on environmental pollution in the TR90 region of Türkiye (including the provinces of Artvin, Giresun, Gümüşhane, Ordu, Rize, and Trabzon) for the years 2007–2021 in the framework of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis. This study utilizes the innovative Method of Moments Quantile Regression (MMQR) approach to investigate these effects. The MMQR results support the EKC hypothesis, which contends that environmental pollution rises in the early stages of economic growth but then declines as growth levels reach a turning point. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that increasing energy consumption exacerbates environmental pollution in the TR90 region.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Akinci, V. Y., Yıldırım, K., Hacıimamoğlu, T. (2024). TR90 Bölgesinde Ekonomik Büyüme ve Enerji Tüketiminin Çevre Kirliliğine Etkisinin Araştırılması: MMQR Yaklaşımından Bir Bakış. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4, 743–762. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1574093

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (74)

  1. Ali, E. B., Shayanmehr, S., Radmehr, R., Amfo, B., Awuni, J. A., Gyamfi, B. A., and Agbozo, E. (2023). Exploring the impact of economic growth on environmental pollution in South American countries: how does renewable energy and globalization matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(6), 15505-15522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23177-4
  2. Ali, M., Raza, S. A., and Khamis, B. (2020). Environmental degradation, economic growth, and energy innovation: evidence from European countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(22), 28306-28315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09142-z
  3. Andreoni, J., and Levinson, A. (2001). The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of public economics, 80(2), 269-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00110-9
  4. Anwar, A., Siddique, M., Dogan, E., and Sharif, A. (2021). The moderating role of renewable and non-renewable energy in environment-income nexus for ASEAN countries: Evidence from Method of Moments Quantile Regression. Renewable Energy, 164, 956-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.128
  5. Armeanu, D. Ş., Gherghina, Ş. C., and Pasmangiu, G. (2019). Exploring the causal nexus between energy consumption, environmental pollution and economic growth: Empirical evidence from central and Eastern Europe. Energies, 12(19), 3704. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12193704
  6. Assi, A. F., Isiksal, A. Z., and Tursoy, T. (2021). Renewable energy consumption, financial development, environmental pollution, and innovations in the ASEAN+ 3 group: Evidence from (P-ARDL) model. Renewable Energy, 165, 689-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.11.052
  7. Atabey, S., and Gürdoğan, A. (2015). Doğu Karadeniz eko-turizm ve HES potansiyelinin, çevreye ve yerel halka etkilerinin SWOT analizi ile değerlendirilmesi. International Journal of Social and Economic Sciences, 5(2), 56-63. https://www.ijses.org/index.php/ijses/article/view/162
  8. Azam, A., Rafiq, M., Shafique, M., and Yuan, J. (2021). Does nuclear or renewable energy consumption help to control environmental pollution? New evidence from China. Renewable Energy Focus, 39, 139-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2021.08.002
  9. Bakirtas, I., and Cetin, M. A. (2017). Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve and pollution haven hypotheses: MIKTA sample. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 18273-18283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9462-y
  10. Bardal, K. G., Reinar, M. B., Lundberg, A. K., and Bjørkan, M. (2021). Factors facilitating the implementation of the sustainable development goals in regional and local planning—experiences from Norway. Sustainability, 13(8), 4282. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084282
  11. Bekun, F. V., Alola, A. A., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Science of the total Environment, 657, 1023-1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.104
  12. Beckerman, W. (1995). Economic growth and the environment: Whose growth? Whose environment? In Growth, the Environment and the Distribution of Incomes (pp. 275-290). Edward Elgar Publishing
  13. British Petroleum (2024). BP statistical review of world energy. Retrieved from https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics.html
  14. Cai, H., Mei, Y., Chen, J., Wu, Z., Lan, L., and Zhu, D. (2020). An analysis of the relation between water pollution and economic growth in China by considering the contemporaneous correlation of water pollutants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 122783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122783
  15. Chen, F., Shao, M., Chen, W., and Wang, F. (2024). Environmental regulation, energy consumption structure, and industrial pollution emissions. Environmental Research Communications, 6(1), 015011. DOI 10.1088/2515-7620/ad1ed5
  16. Chen, L., and Shapiro, S. S. (1995). An alternative test for normality based on normalized spacings. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 53(3-4), 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949659508811711
  17. Destek, M. A., and Aslan, A. (2020). Disaggregated renewable energy consumption and environmental pollution nexus in G-7 countries. Renewable Energy, 151, 1298-1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.138
  18. Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecological economics, 49(4), 431-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011
  19. Doğu Karadeniz Kalkınma Ajansı [DOKA] (2014). 2014-2023 TR90 Doğu Karadeniz Bölge Planı, 280 sayfa. T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı, Retrieved from https://www.kalkinmakutuphanesi.gov.tr/dokuman/2014-2023-tr90-dogu-karadeniz-bolge-plani/280. 3.5.2024
  20. Fatima, T., Saeed Meo, M., Bekun, F. V., and Ibrahim, T. O. (2021). The impact of energy consumption to environmental sustainability: an extension of foreign direct investment induce pollution in Vietnam. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 15(6), 1144-1162
  21. Ghosh, S. (2002). Electricity consumption and economic growth in India. Energy policy, 30(2), 125-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00078-7
  22. Giovanis, E. (2013). Environmental Kuznets curve: Evidence from the British household panel survey. Economic Modelling, 30, 602-611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.10.013
  23. Grossman, G. M., and Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. Working Paper 3914, DOI:10.3386/w3914
  24. Grossman, G. M., and Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353-377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
  25. He, R. F., Zhong, M. R., and Huang, J. B. (2021). The dynamic effects of renewable-energy and fossil-fuel technological progress on metal consumption in the electric power industry. Resources Policy, 71, 101985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.101985
  26. Ibekilo, B., Ekesiobi, C., and Emmanuel, P. M. (2023). Heterogeneous assessment of urbanisation, energy consumption and environmental pollution in Africa: the role of regulatory quality. Economic Change and Restructuring, 56(6), 4421-4444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-023-09559-9
  27. Jiatong, W., Xu, Q., Sibt-e-Ali, M., Shahzad, F., and Ayub, B. (2023). How economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk affect environmental pollution: does renewable energy consumption matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(45), 101858-101872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29553-y
  28. Kankal, M., and Akçay, F. (2019). Doğu Karadeniz Havzasi Hidroelektrik Enerji Durumunun İncelenmesi. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 892-901. https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.598239
  29. Kaya, F., and Yıldırım, G. (2020). Ekoturizm potansiyeli açısından Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi’nin değerlendirilmesi. Tourism and Recreation, 2(2), 125-133
  30. Kijima, M., Nishide, K., and Ohyama, A. (2010). Economic models for the environmental Kuznets curve: A survey. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34(7), 1187-1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2010.03.010 Koenker, R. (2004). Quantile regression for longitudinal data. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 91(1), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2004.05.006
  31. Koenker, R., and Bassett Jr, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 16, 33-50
  32. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28
  33. Lean, H. H., and Smyth, R. (2010). CO2 emissions, electricity consumption and output in ASEAN. Applied Energy, 87(6), 1858-1864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.02.003
  34. Liu, J., Qu, J., and Zhao, K. (2019). Is China’s development conforms to the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis and the pollution haven hypothesis? Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, 787-796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.234
  35. Machado, J. A., and Silva, J. S. (2019). Quantiles via moments. Journal of Econometrics, 213(1), 145-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.04.009
  36. Ministry of Industry and Technology. (2017). Socio-economic development ranking of provinces and regions SEGE-2017. Retrieved from https://www.sanayi.gov.tr/merkez-birimi/b94224510b7b/sege
  37. Nasir, M. A., Huynh, T. L. D., and Tram, H. T. X. (2019). Role of financial development, economic growth and foreign direct investment in driving climate change: A case of emerging ASEAN. Journal of environmental management, 242, 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.112
  38. Nasrollahi, Z., Hashemi, M. S., Bameri, S., and Mohamad Taghvaee, V. (2020). Environmental pollution, economic growth, population, industrialization, and technology in weak and strong sustainability: using STIRPAT model. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22, 1105-1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0237-5
  39. Nawaz, S. M. N., Alvi, S., and Akmal, T. (2021). The impasse of energy consumption coupling with pollution haven hypothesis and environmental Kuznets curve: a case study of South Asian economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(35), 48799-48807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14164-2
  40. Panayotou, T. (1997). Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool. Environment and Development Economics, 2(4), 465-484. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X97000259
  41. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
  42. Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econometric Reviews, 34(6-10), 1089-1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2014.956623
  43. Pesaran, M. H., and Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010.
  44. Rao, C., and Yan, B. (2020). Study on the interactive influence between economic growth and environmental pollution. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 39442-39465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10017-6
  45. Sánchez Gassen, N., Penje, O., and Slätmo, E. (2018). Global goals for local priorities: The 2030 Agenda at local level. Nordregio
  46. Sarkodie, S. A., and Adams, S. (2018). Renewable energy, nuclear energy, and environmental pollution: accounting for political institutional quality in South Africa. Science of the Total Environment, 643, 1590-1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.320
  47. Shiu, A., and Lam, P. L. (2004). Electricity consumption and economic growth in China. Energy Policy, 32(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00250-1
  48. Song, T, Zheng, TG and Tong, L. J. (2008). An empirical test of the environmental Kuznets curve in China: a panel cointegration approach. China Economic Review, 19(3), 381-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2007.10.001
  49. Stern, D. I., and Zha, D. (2016). Economic growth and particulate pollution concentrations in China. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 18, 327-338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-016-0148-3
  50. Sulemana, I., James, H. S., and Rikoon, J. S. (2017). Environmental Kuznets Curves for air pollution in African and developed countries: exploring turning point incomes and the role of democracy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 6(2), 134-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2016.1231635
  51. Sumaira, and Siddique, H. M. A. (2023). Industrialization, energy consumption, and environmental pollution: evidence from South Asia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(2), 4094-4102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22317-0
  52. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] (2021). Summary for Policymakers, Climate Change 2021: the Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA (2021), 10.1017/CBO9781139177245.003
  53. Turkish Statistical Institute [TURKSTAT] (2024). Statistical themes. Retrieved from https://www.tuik.gov.tr
  54. United Nations [UN] (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations General Assembly, New York, retrieved form https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda. 3.5.2024
  55. UN Environment (2019). Global Environment Outlook – GEO-6: Summary for Policymakers. Nairobi. DOI 10.1017/9781108639217
  56. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division [UNDESA-PD] (2022). World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results. UN DESA/POP/2022/TR/NO. 3
  57. United Nations Environment Programme [UNEP] (2024). Global Resources Outlook 2024: Bend the Trend – Pathways to a liveable planet as resource use spikes. International Resource Panel. Nairobi. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/44901
  58. United Nations Environment Programme [UNEP] (2010). Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Consumption and Production: Priority Products and Materials. A Report of the Working Group on the Environmental Impacts of Products and Materials to the International Panel for Sustainable Resource Management. Hertwich, E., van der Voet, E., Suh, S., Tukker, A., Huijbregts M., Kazmierczyk, P. et al. (eds.). Retrieved form https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/8572, (5.5. 2024)
  59. Valencia, S. C., Simon, D., Croese, S., Nordqvist, J., Oloko, M., Sharma, T.,. and Versace, I. (2019). Adapting the Sustainable Development Goals and the New Urban Agenda to the city level: Initial reflections from a comparative research project. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 11(1), 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2019.1573172
  60. Wang, Y., Guan, W., Liu, L., and Ma, X. (2022). Biomass energy consumption and carbon neutrality in OECD countries: Testing pollution haven hypothesis and environmental Kuznets curve. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 975481. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.975481
  61. Wang, Z. (2019). Does biomass energy consumption help to control environmental pollution? Evidence from BRICS countries. Science of the total environment, 670, 1075-1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.268
  62. Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), 193-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.967
  63. Westerlund, J., and Edgerton, D. L. (2007). A panel bootstrap cointegration test. Economics Letters, 97(3), 185-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2007.03.003
  64. Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2006). Electricity consumption and economic growth: a time series experience for 17 African countries. Energy policy, 34(10), 1106-1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.10.008
  65. Xiong, J., and Xu, D. (2021). Relationship between energy consumption, economic growth and environmental pollution in China. Environmental Research, 194, 110718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.110718
  66. Yilanci, V., and Ozgur, O. (2019). Testing the environmental Kuznets curve for G7 countries: evidence from a bootstrap panel causality test in rolling windows. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 24795-24805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05745-3
  67. Yıldırım, K., and Ayna, Y. E. (2016). Doğu Karadeniz’in Kentleşme Yapısı ve Sorunları. Karadeniz Araştırmaları, 13(52), 1-26
  68. Yılmaz, C. B., Demir, V., and Sevimli, M. F. (2021). Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi meteorolojik parametrelerinin trend analizi. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (24), 489-496. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.916018
  69. Yuan, L. (2024). Could Environmental Regulations Reduce Energy Consumption: Evidence from China’s Implementation of an Environmental Pollution Tax. The Journal of Environment and Development, 10704965241238291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496524123829
  70. Zhang, C., Cao, R., Majeed, M. T., and Usman, A. (2022). Clean energy consumption and CO2 emissions: does China reduce some pollution burdens through environmental regulation? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(52), 79156-79167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21140-x
  71. Zhang, C., Zhou, K., Yang, S., and Shao, Z. (2017). On electricity consumption and economic growth in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 353-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.071
  72. Zhang, J., Zhang, K., and Zhao, F. (2020). Spatial effects of economic growth, energy consumption and environmental pollution in the provinces of China—An empirical study of a spatial econometrics model. Sustainable Development, 28(4), 868-879. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2042
  73. Žiković, S., Žiković, I. T., and Lenz, N. V. (2020). A disaggregated approach to energy-growth nexus: Micro-regional view. Energy Strategy Reviews, 28, 100467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100467
  74. Valencia, S. C., Simon, D., Croese, S., Nordqvist, J., Oloko, M., Sharma, T.,. and Versace, I. (2019). Adapting the Sustainable Development Goals and the New Urban Agenda to the city level: Initial reflections from a comparative research project. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 11(1), 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2019.1573172