KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4

Kompleksite Makro İktisadı: Ajan Bazlı Bir Model

Complexity Macroeconomics: An Agent Based Model

İbrahim Başaran(TURKISH - GERMAN UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-3211-0223
Ercan Eren(YILDIZ TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4513-278X
Sayfa
1782–1807
Yayın Tarihi
2025-12-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Elde edilen bulgular, klasik denge temelli yaklaşımların ötesine geçilerek ekonomik sistemin daha gerçekçi, dinamik ve kapsayıcı bir biçimde kavramaya olanak tanıyan bir çerçevenin mümkün olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, kompleksite iktisadının özellikle makro iktisat alanına sunduğu temel argümanlar doğrultusunda geliştirilen temel bir ajan bazlı makroekonomik model sunmayı amaçlamaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Yerleşik makroekonomik modellerin temsili ajanlar, rasyonel beklentiler ve denge varsayımları üzerine kurulu yapısına karşılık, çalışmada mikro düzeyde heterojen özelliklere sahip ve sınırlı rasyonellikle hareket eden ajanların doğrudan etkileşimleri sonucu ortaya çıkan makroekonomik dinamikler ön plana çıkarılmaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Elde edilen bulgular, klasik denge temelli yaklaşımların ötesine geçilerek ekonomik sistemin daha gerçekçi, dinamik ve kapsayıcı bir biçimde kavramaya olanak tanıyan bir çerçevenin mümkün olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Kompleksite İktisadı · Ajan Bazlı Makro İktisat · Kompleks Adaptif Sistemler

Özet

Bu çalışma, kompleksite iktisadının özellikle makro iktisat alanına sunduğu temel argümanlar doğrultusunda geliştirilen temel bir ajan bazlı makroekonomik model sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Yerleşik makroekonomik modellerin temsili ajanlar, rasyonel beklentiler ve denge varsayımları üzerine kurulu yapısına karşılık, çalışmada mikro düzeyde heterojen özelliklere sahip ve sınırlı rasyonellikle hareket eden ajanların doğrudan etkileşimleri sonucu ortaya çıkan makroekonomik dinamikler ön plana çıkarılmaktadır. Modelde yer alan ekonomik birimler, sınırlı bilgiye dayalı olarak çevresel koşullarını değerlendirmekte ve sezgisel davranış kuralları çerçevesinde kararlarını şekillendirmektedir. Bu çerçevede piyasalar, önceden tanımlanmış bir denge durumuna ulaşma zorunluluğu olmaksızın, ajanlar arası kompleks etkileşimlerin sonucu olarak kendiliğinden örgütlenen ve evrimsel olarak gelişen yapılar olarak ele alınmaktadır. Elde edilen bulgular, klasik denge temelli yaklaşımların ötesine geçilerek ekonomik sistemin daha gerçekçi, dinamik ve kapsayıcı bir biçimde kavramaya olanak tanıyan bir çerçevenin mümkün olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bu durum, kompleksite iktisadının, özellikle kriz, belirsizlik dönemleri gibi düzensizlik içeren ve durağan olmayan süreçlerin analizinde daha işlevsel olabileceğini göstermektedir.

Abstract

This study aims to present a baseline agent-based macroeconomic model developed in line with the core arguments that complexity economics brings, particularly to the field of macroeconomics. In contrast to the structure of standard macroeconomic models, which are built upon representative agents, rational expectations, and equilibrium assumptions, this study foregrounds macroeconomic dynamics that emerge from the direct interactions of agents who have heterogeneous characteristics at the micro level and operate with bounded rationality. The economic actors in the model assess their environmental conditions based on limited information and shape their decisions within the framework of heuristic behavioral rules. Within this context, markets are conceptualized as self-organizing and evolutionarily developing structures that arise from complex agent interactions, without the necessity of reaching a predefined equilibrium state. The findings demonstrate that it is possible to construct a framework that enables a more realistic, dynamic, and inclusive understanding of the economic system, moving beyond classical equilibrium-based approaches. This indicates that complexity economics may offer a more functional framework for analyzing irregular and non-stationary processes, particularly during periods of crisis and uncertainty.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Başaran, İ., Eren, E. (2025). Kompleksite Makro İktisadı: Ajan Bazlı Bir Model. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4, 1782–1807. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1777353

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (60)

  1. Arthur, W.B. (2015). Complexity and the economy (1. ed.). Oxford University Press.
  2. Arthur, W.B., Steven, N.D. and David, A.L. (1997). Process and emergence in the economy. The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II, 1997, 1-14. Retrieved from https://faculty.sites.iastate.edu/
  3. Arthur, W.B. (2021). Foundations of complexity economics. Nature Reviews Physics 3(2), 136-45. https://doi:10.1038/s42254-020-00273-3.
  4. Axtell, R.L. (2007). What economic agents do: How cognition and interaction lead to emergence and complexity, The Review of Austrian Economics, 20(2-3),105-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-007-0021-5
  5. Blanchard, O. (2018). On the future of macroeconomic models. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 34(1-2), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx045
  6. Caballero, R.J. (2010). Macroeconomics after the crisis: Time to deal with the pretense-of-knowledge syndrome. Journal of Economic Perspectives 24(4), 85-102. doi:10.1257/jep.24.4.85.
  7. Caiani, A., Godin, A., Caverzasi, E., Gallegati, M., Kinsella, S. and Stiglitz. J.E. (2016). Agent based-stock flow consistent macroeconomics: Towards a benchmark model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 69, 375-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2016.06.001
  8. Caiani, A., Russo, A. and Gallegati. M. (2019). Does inequality hamper innovation and growth? An AB-SFC analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 29(1), 177-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-018-0554-8
  9. Cincotti, S., Raberto, M. and Teglio, A. (2022). Why do we need agent-based macroeconomics? Review of Evolutionary Political Economy 3(1), 5-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43253-022-00071-w
  10. Colander, D. (2019). Complexity, the evolution of macroeconomic thought, and micro foundations (Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie No. 2019-42). Retrieved from https://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue91/Colander91.pdf
  11. Colander, D., Holt, R. and Rosser, B. (2004). The changing face of mainstream economics. Review of Political Economy, 16(4), 485-499. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953825042000256702
  12. Colander, D., Howitt, P., Kirman, A., Leijonhufvud, A. and Mehrling, P. (2008). Beyond DSGE models: Toward an empirically based macroeconomics. American Economic Review 98(2), 236-40. doi:10.1257/aer.98.2.236
  13. Dawid, H. and Delli Gatti, D. (2018). Agent-based macroeconomics. In C.H. Hommes and B. LeBaron (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics (pp. 63–156). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hescom.2018.02.006
  14. Delli Gatti, D., Di Guilmi, C., Gaffeo, E., Giulioni, G., Gallegati, M. and Palestrini, A. (2005). A new approach to business fluctuations: Heterogeneous interacting agents, scaling laws and financial fragility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 56(4), 489–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.10.012
  15. Delli Gatti, D., Gaffeo, E., Gallegati, M., Giulioni, G., Kirman, A., Palestrini, A. and Russo, A. (2007). Complex dynamics and empirical evidence. Information Sciences, 177(5), 1204-1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2006.08.003
  16. Delli Gatti, D., Gallegati, M., Greenwald, B., Russo, A. and Stiglitz, J.E. (2010). The financial accelerator in an evolving credit network. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34(9), 1627-1650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2010.06.019
  17. Dosi, G. and Roventini, A. (2025). Agent-based macroeconomics: The Schumpeter meeting Keynes models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Dosi, G. and Roventini, A. (2019). More is different. and complex! The case for agent-based macroeconomics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 29(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-019-00609-y
  19. Eren, E. (2020). Makro iktisat ve kriz: Çözüm Mezo iktisat mı? İktisat ve Toplum, 121, 54-63. Erişim adresi: https://iktisatvetoplum.com/
  20. Eren, E. ve Uysal, E. (2017). İktisatta yeni Heterodoks gelişmeler. Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 134-151. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/klujfeas/
  21. Faggini, M., Bruno, B. and Parziale, A. (2019). Crises in economic complex networks: Black Swans or Dragon Kings? Economic Analysis and Policy, 62, 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2019.01.009
  22. Fagiolo, G., Dosi, G. and Gabriele, R. (2004). Matching, bargaining, and wage setting in an evolutionary model of labor market and output dynamics. Advances in Complex Systems, 7(02), 157-186. doi:10.1142/S0219525904000135
  23. Farmer, J.D. and Foley, D. (2009). The economy needs agent-based modelling. Nature, 460(7256), 685-686. https://doi.org/10.1038/460685a
  24. Fierro, L.E. (2020). Three essays in agent-based macroeconomics. Retrieved from https://iris.univpm.it/retrieve/e18b8791-5cd1-d302-e053-1705fe0a27c8/Tesi_Fierro.pdf
  25. Foster, J. and Metcalfe, J.S. (2012). Economic emergence: An evolutionary economic perspective. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 82(2-3), 420-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.09.008
  26. Gaffeo, E., Delli Gatti, D., Desiderio, S. and Gallegati, M. (2008). Adaptive microfoundations for emergent macroeconomics. Eastern Economic Journal 34(4), 441-63. doi:10.1057/eej.2008.27.
  27. Gallegati, G., Gallegati, M. and Landini, S. (2024). Agent-based modelling: A tool for complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  28. Godley, W. and Lavoie, M. (2007). Monetary economics: An integrated approach to credit, money, income, production and wealth. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  29. Haldane, A.G. and Turrell, A.E. (2018). An interdisciplinary model for macroeconomics. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 34(1-2), 219-251. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx051
  30. Hayek, F.A. (1979). The counter-revolution of science: Studies on the abuse of reason. Stanford Press.
  31. Heijdra, B.J. and Ploeg, F. (2003). The foundations of modern macroeconomics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  32. Holt, R.P.F., Rosser, J.B. and Colander, D. (2011). The complexity era in economics. Review of Political Economy, 23(3), 357-69. doi:10.1080/09538259.2011.583820.
  33. Hommes, C., He, M., Poledna, S., Siqueira, M. and Zhang, Y. (2025). CANVAS: A Canadian behavioral agent-based model for monetary policy. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 172, 104986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2024.104986
  34. Kaplan, G., Moll, B. and. Violante, G.L. (2018). Monetary policy according to HANK. American Economic Review, 108(3): 697–743. doi:10.1257/aer.20160042
  35. Kirman, A. (2010). The economic crisis is a crisis for economic theory. CESifo Economic Studies 56(4), 498-535. doi:10.1093/cesifo/ifq017
  36. Kocherlakota, N. (2010). Modern macroeconomic models as tools for economic policy. Retrieved from https://www.minneapolisfed.org/
  37. Lavoie, M. (1992). Foundations of Post-Keynesian economic analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Press.
  38. LeBaron, B. and Tesfatsion, L. (2008). Modeling macroeconomies as open-ended dynamic systems of interacting agents. American Economic Review, 98(2), 246-50. doi:10.1257/aer.98.2.246
  39. Lee, J.W. and Nobi, A. (2018). State and network structures of stock markets around the global financial crisis. Computational Economics, 51(2), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-017-9672-x
  40. Leijonhufvud, A. (1993). Towards a not-too-rational macroeconomics. Southern Economic Journal, 60(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.2307/1059926
  41. Lengnick, M. (2013). Agent-based macroeconomics: A baseline model. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 86, 102-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.021
  42. McKay, A. and Reis, R. (2016). The role of automatic stabilizers in the U.S. business cycle. Econometrica, 84(1), 141-94. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43866542
  43. Moll, B. (2024). The trouble with rational expectations in heterogeneous agent models: A challenge for macroeconomics. Retrieved from https://benjaminmoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/challenge.pdf
  44. Muth, J.F. (1961). Rational expectations and the theory of price movements. Econometrica, 29(3), 315. doi:10.2307/1909635
  45. Ottonello, P. and Winberry, T. (2020). Financial heterogeneity and the investment channel of monetary policy. Econometrica, 88(6), 2473-2502. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA15949
  46. Öğüt, K. (2018). Kompleksite iktisadı çerçevesinde Keynes ve Keynesyen makro iktisat: Metodolojik bir analız. Yıldız Social Science Review, 4(2), 137-52. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/yssr/
  47. Peters, F., Neuberger, D., Reinhardt, O. and Uhrmacher, A. (2022). A basic macroeconomic agent-based model for analyzing monetary regime shifts. Plos one, 17(12), e0277615. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277615
  48. Poledna, S., Miess, M.G., Hommes, C. and Rabitsch, K. (2023). Economic forecasting with an agent-based model. European Economic Review, 151, 104306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104306
  49. Riccetti, L., Russo, A. and Gallegati, M. (2015). An agent based decentralized matching macroeconomic model. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 10(2), 305-332. doi:10.1007/s11403-014-0130-8
  50. Romer, P. (2016). The trouble with macroeconomics. Retrieved from https://paulromer.net/the-trouble-with-macro/WP-Trouble.pdf
  51. Rosser, J.B. (2021). Foundations and applications of complexity economics. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  52. Russo, A., Catalano, M., Gaffeo, E., Gallegati, M. and Napoletano. M. (2007). Industrial dynamics, fiscal policy and RveD: Evidence from a Computational Experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 64(3-4), 426-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.06.016
  53. Russo, A., Riccetti, L. and Gallegati, M. (2016). Increasing inequality, consumer credit and financial fragility in an agent based macroeconomic model. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 26(1), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-015-0410-z
  54. Serletis, A. (2014). Introduction to macroeconomic dynamics special issue on complexity in economic systems. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 20(2), 461-65. doi:10.1017/S1365100514000261
  55. Steindl, J. (1952). Maturity and stagnation in American capitalism (No. 4). NYU Press.
  56. Stiglitz, J.E. (2018). Where modern macroeconomics went wrong? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 34(1-2), 70-106. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx057
  57. Tesfatsion, L. (2006). Agent-based computational economics: A constructive approach to economic theory. In L. Tesfatsion and K.L. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics: Volume 2, agent-based computational economics (pp. 831–880). Elsevier.
  58. Trichet, J-C. (2010). Reflections on the nature of monetary policy non-standard measures and finance theory. Retrieved from http://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2010/html/sp101118.en.html
  59. Wagner, R.E. (2020). Macroeconomics as systems theory: Transcending the micro-macro dichotomy. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44465-5
  60. Dosi, G. and Roventini, A. (2019). More is different. and complex! The case for agent-based macroeconomics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 29(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-019-00609-y