Dergiler / Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 23 Sayı: 4

GELENEKSEL WEB TABANLI ÖĞRETİM SİSTEMLERİNDEN UYARLANIR ÖĞRETİM SİSTEMİNE GEÇİŞ: UHÖS İÇİN TASARIM YAKLAŞIMLARININ İNCELENMESİ

Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2013-02-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

UHÖS'ün geleneksel sistemlere göre üstünlükleri sunulmuş ve mevcut çalışmalar değerlendirilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Geleneksel bilgisayar destekli öğretim sistemleri kullanıcıların bireysel farklılıklarını dikkate almaksızın tüm kullanıcılar için aynı öğretim stratejisini kullanarak statik sayfalardan oluşan öğretim materyalini öğrencilere sunmaktadırlar.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu durum, bilgisayar destekli öğretim sistemlerinin sınıf ortamında gerçekleştirilen yüz-yüze öğretim yöntemine alternatif olamadığı gibi, öğretim etkinliği açısından kabul edilebilir bir kazanımın sağlanamamasına sebep olmaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:UHÖS'ün geleneksel sistemlere göre üstünlükleri sunulmuş ve mevcut çalışmalar değerlendirilmiştir.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Uyarlanır hipermedya öğretim sistemi · bilgisayar destekli öğretim sistemi · kullanıcı modelleme

Özet

Geleneksel bilgisayar destekli öğretim sistemleri kullanıcıların bireysel farklılıklarını dikkate almaksızın tüm kullanıcılar için aynı öğretim stratejisini kullanarak statik sayfalardan oluşan öğretim materyalini öğrencilere sunmaktadırlar. Bu durum, bilgisayar destekli öğretim sistemlerinin sınıf ortamında gerçekleştirilen yüz-yüze öğretim yöntemine alternatif olamadığı gibi, öğretim etkinliği açısından kabul edilebilir bir kazanımın sağlanamamasına sebep olmaktadır. Bu makalede, bilgisayar destekli öğretim sistemlerinde öğrenim verimliliğini üst düzeye çıkartan, geleneksel sistemlerden tamamen farklı bir mimari yapıya ve tasarım yaklaşımına sahip Uyarlanır Hipermedya Öğretim Sistemi (UHÖS) incelenmektedir. Çalışmada genel bir UHÖS mimarisi verilmiştir. UHÖS’ün merkezi bileşeni olan öğrenci modelinin oluşturulması ve bu model içerisinde kullanıcının bilgi alanı hakkındaki bilgi düzeyinin tespit edilmesi örnek bir uygulama ile açıklanmıştır. UHÖS'ün geleneksel sistemlere göre üstünlükleri sunulmuş ve mevcut çalışmalar değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Sağıroğlu, Ş., Çolak, İ., Kahraman, H. T. (2013). GELENEKSEL WEB TABANLI ÖĞRETİM SİSTEMLERİNDEN UYARLANIR ÖĞRETİM SİSTEMİNE GEÇİŞ: UHÖS İÇİN TASARIM YAKLAŞIMLARININ İNCELENMESİ. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 4. https://ajindex.com/articles/1078779

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (222)

  1. Brusilovsky, P., “Adaptive navigation support in
  2. educational hypermedia: the role of student
  3. knowledge level and the case for metaadaptation”,
  4. British Journal of Educational
  5. Technology”, Vol. 34, No 4, 487–497, (2003).
  6. Anderson, J. R., “The Expert Module”,
  7. Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems,
  8. 53, (1988).
  9. Kavcic, A., "Fuzzy User Modeling for Adaptation
  10. in Educational Hypermedia", IEEE
  11. Transactions on Systems, Applications and
  12. Reviews, Vol. 34, No. 4, (2004).
  13. Cao, L., “Designing Web-Based Adaptive
  14. Learning Environment: Distils as an Example”,
  15. Ph. D. Thesis Faculty of New Jersey Institute of
  16. Technology, (2001).
  17. Rubim de Assis, A. S. F, “Inferring Dynamic
  18. Learner Behavior for User Modeling in
  19. Continuously Adapting Hypermedia”, Ph. D.
  20. Thesis Faculty of Rensselaer Polytechnic
  21. Institute Troy, New York, (2006).
  22. Brusilovsky, P., “Developing adaptive
  23. educational hypermedia systems: from design
  24. models to authoring tools”, School of
  25. Information Sciences University of Pittsburgh
  26. Pittsburgh PA 15260, (2003).
  27. Kahraman, H. T., Colak, I., Sagiroglu, S., “A
  28. Web Based Adaptive Educational System”, Sixth
  29. International Conference on Machine Learning
  30. and Applications, IEEE computer society, 286-, (2007).
  31. Brusilovsky, P., “Hypadapter: An Adaptive
  32. Hypertext System for Exploratory Learning and
  33. Programming”, Adaptive Hypertext and
  34. Hypermedia, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 117-, (1996).
  35. Ihsak, Z., Arshad M. M. R., Sumari P., “Adaptive
  36. Hypermedia System in Education (review of
  37. available technologies)”, IEEE ICICS-PCM
  38. Singapore, 15-18, (2003).
  39. Fan, J. P., Macredie. R. D., “Gender Differences
  40. and Hypermedia Navigation: Principles for
  41. Adaptive Hypermedia Learning Systems”,
  42. Advances in Web-Based Education:
  43. Personalized Learning Environments Chapter, Hershey, PA, USA: Information Science
  44. Publishing, 1-21, (2005).
  45. De Bra, P., Houben, G. J., and Wu, H., “AHAM: A
  46. Dexter-based reference model for adaptive
  47. hypermedia applications”, Proceedings of the 10th
  48. ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia
  49. New York: ACM Press, 147–156, (1999).
  50. Halasz, F. G., Schwartz, M., “The Dexter Hypertext
  51. Reference Model”, NIST Hypertext Standardization
  52. Workshop Gaithersburg, 1-40, (1990).
  53. Brusilovsky, P., “Methods and techniques of
  54. adaptive hypermedia” User Modeling and User
  55. Adapted Interaction, 87-129, (1996).
  56. Brusilovsky, P., “User Modeling and User-Adapted
  57. Interaction”, Adaptive Hypermedia, 11, (2001).
  58. Karampiperis, P., Sampson, D., “Adaptive
  59. Resources Sequencing in Educational
  60. Hypermedia Systems”, Educational Technology
  61. and Society, 128-147, (2005).
  62. Çolak, İ., Sagiroglu, S., Kahraman, H. T.,
  63. “Architecture of Web Based Adaptive
  64. Educational Hypermedia System”, Second
  65. International Conference on Innovations in
  66. Learning for the Future 2008 e-Learning, 358-, (2008).
  67. Armani. J., Botturi. L., “Bridging the Gap with
  68. MAID: A Method for Adaptive Instructional
  69. Design”, Advances in Web-Based Education:
  70. Personalized Learning Environments, Hershey,
  71. PA, USA: Information Science Publishing,
  72. 178, (2005).
  73. Magoulas, G. D., Papanikolaou, K. A.,
  74. Grigoriadou, M., “Neuro-fuzzy Synergism for
  75. PlNNing the Content in a Web-based Course”,
  76. Informatics 25, 39-48, (2001).
  77. Papanikolaou, K. A., Grigoriadou, M., Kornilakis,
  78. H., Magoulas, G. D., “Personalizing the
  79. Interaction in a Web-based Educational
  80. Hypermedia System: the case of INSPIRE”,
  81. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction,
  82. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 213-267, (2003).
  83. Castillo, G., Gama, J., Breda, A. M., “An
  84. Adaptive Predictive Model for Student
  85. Modelling”,Advances in Web-Based Education:
  86. PA, USA: Information Science Publishing, 70-, (2005).
  87. Henze, N., Naceur, K., Nejdl, W., Wolpers, M.,
  88. “Adaptive hyperbooks for constructivist
  89. teaching”, Künstliche Intelligenz, (4), (1999).
  90. Hockemeyer, C., Held, T., & Albert, D., RATH -
  91. "A relational adaptive tutoring hypertext WWWenvironment
  92. based on knowledge space theory”,
  93. Proceedings of CALISCE'98, 4th International
  94. conference on Computer Aided Learning and Instruction in Science and Engineering, June
  95. 17, (1998).
  96. NeumNN, G., & Zirvas, J., SKILL - A scalable
  97. internet-based teaching and learning system. In
  98. H. Maurer, & R. G. Olson (Eds.), Proceedings of
  99. WebNet'98, World Conference of the WWW,
  100. Internet, and Intranet, November 7-12, (1998).
  101. Weber, G., Kuhl, H.-C., & Weibelzahl, S.,
  102. “Developing adaptive internet based courses
  103. with the authoring system NetCoach”
  104. Proceedings of Third workshop on Adaptive
  105. Hypertext and Hypermedia, July 35-48, (2001).
  106. Pilar da Silva, D., Durm, R. V., Duval, E., &
  107. Olivié, H., “Concepts and documents for
  108. adaptive educational hypermedia: a model and a
  109. prototype”, Computing Science Reports,
  110. Eindhoven University of Technology, 35-43.
  111. De Bra, P., & Ruiter, J.-P., “AHA! Adaptive
  112. hypermedia for all”, Proceedings of
  113. WebNet'2001, World Conference of the WWW
  114. and Internet, 262-268, (2001).
  115. Vassileva, J., “DCG + GTE: Dynamic Courseware
  116. Generation with Teaching Expertise”, Instructional
  117. Science, 317-332, (1998).
  118. Kelly, D., Tangney, B., “ ‘First Aid for You’:
  119. Getting to know your Learning Style using
  120. Machine Learning”, Proceedings of the Fifth
  121. IEEE International Conference on Advanced
  122. Learning Technologies (ICALT’05), (2005).
  123. Martinez, F. E., Chen, S.Y., Liu, X., “Survey of
  124. Data Mining Approaches to User Modeling for
  125. Adaptive Hypermedia”, IEEE Transactions On
  126. Systems, Applications And Reviews, Vol. 36,
  127. , 734-749, (2006).
  128. Martinez, F. E., Magoulas, G., Chen, S.,
  129. Macredie, R., “Modeling human behavior in
  130. user-adapted systems: Recent advances using
  131. soft computing techniques”, Expert Systems with
  132. Applications ELSEVIER, 320-329, (2005).
  133. Lee, C-S., Singh, Y. P., “Student modeling using
  134. principal component analysis of SOM clusters”,
  135. Proceedings of the IEEE International
  136. Conference on Advanced Learning
  137. Technologies (ICALT’04), 480-484, (2004).
  138. Nykanen, O., “Inducing Fuzzy Models for
  139. Student Classification”, Educational
  140. Technology & Society, 223-234, (2006).
  141. Wenger, E., "Artificial intelligence and tutoring
  142. systems", Computational approaches to the
  143. communication of knowledge, ACM SIGCHI
  144. Bulletin, 71-73, (1988).
  145. Brusilovsky, P., Eklund, J., Schwarz, E., “Webbased
  146. Education for All: A Tool for
  147. Development Adaptive Courseware”, Computer
  148. Networks and ISDN Systems, Proceedings of
  149. Seventh International World Wide Web
  150. Conference, 291-300, (1998).
  151. De Bra, P., Aerts, A., Berden, B., de Lange, B.,
  152. Rousseau, B., Santic, T., Smits, D., Stash, N.,
  153. “AHA! The Adaptive Hypermedia Architecture”,
  154. HT’03, Nottingham, United Kingdom, ACM 1-
  155. 0008, 1-4, (2003).
  156. Brusilovsky, P., Anderson, J., "An adaptive
  157. system for learning cognitive psychology on the
  158. Web", Proceedings of WebNet'98, World
  159. Conference of the WWW, Internet, and
  160. Intranet, 92-97, (1998).
  161. Millan, E., De-La-Cruz, J. L. P., “A Bayesian
  162. Diagnostic Algorithm for Modeling and its
  163. Evaluation”, User Modeling and User Adapted
  164. Interaction, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 281-, (2002).
  165. Castillo, G., Gama, J., & Medas, P., "Adaptation
  166. to drifting concepts", Progress in Artificial
  167. Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Artificial
  168. Intelligence, SpringerVerlag, (2003).
  169. Wludyka. P. S., Jacobs. S. L., “Runs Rules and PCharts
  170. for Multistream Binomial Processes”,
  171. Communications in Statistics -Simulation and
  172. Computation, 97–142, (2002).
  173. Lucas. J. M., Davis. D. J., Saniga. E. M.,
  174. “Detecting improvement using Shewhart
  175. attribute control charts when the lower control
  176. limit is zero”, IEEE Transactions, 38:8, 699–
  177. Wang. Z., Ma. W., “Design of an Optimum
  178. Adaptive Control Chart for Attributes”,
  179. Proceedings of the 2003 Systems and
  180. Information Engineering Design Symposium,
  181. 219, (2003).
  182. Tsiriga, V., Virvou, M., “A Framework for the
  183. Initialization of Student Models in Web-based
  184. Intelligent Tutoring Systems”, User Modeling and
  185. User-Adapted Interaction, Pages: 289-316, (2004).
  186. Mitchell. T. M., “Machine Learning”, McGraw-
  187. Hill Science/Engineering/Math, 154-184, (1997).
  188. Conati. C., Gertner. A., Vanlehn. K., “Using
  189. Bayesian Networks Uncertainty in Student
  190. Modeling”, www.cs.ubc.ca/~conati/mypapers/
  191. umuai2002.pdf, 1-42, (2002).
  192. Horvitz, E., Breese, J., Heckerman, D., Hovel, D.,
  193. Rommelse, K., “The Lumiere Project: Bayesian
  194. User Modeling for Inferring the Goals and Needs
  195. of Software Users”, Adaptive Systems &
  196. Interaction Microsoft Research, 1-10, (1998).
  197. Conati, C., Gertner, A. S., Van Lehn, K.,
  198. Druzdzel, M. J., “On-Line Student Modeling for
  199. Coached Problem Solving Using Bayesian
  200. Networks”, Proceedings of the Sixth
  201. International Conference on User Modeling
  202. (UM-97), 1-12, (1997).
  203. Hibou, M., Labat, J. M., “Embedded Bayesian
  204. network student models”, Information Technology
  205. Based Higher Education and Training, ITHET
  206. Proceedings of the Fifth International
  207. Conference, IEEE, 468-472, (2004).
  208. Stern, M. K., "Using Adaptive Hypermedia and
  209. Machine Learning to Create Intelligent Web Based Courses", Ph. D. Thesis, University of
  210. Massachusetts Amherst, 11-122, (2001).
  211. Weber, G., Brusilovsky, P., "An Adaptive
  212. Versatile System for Web-based Instruction",
  213. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence
  214. in Education, 351-384, (2001).
  215. Chen, Q., Norcio, A. F., “Modeling Users with
  216. Neural Architectures”, Neural Networks, 1992.
  217. IJCNN, International Joint Conference, Vol. 1,
  218. IEEE, 547-552, (1992).
  219. Herder, E., Dijk, B., “Site Structure and User Navigation:
  220. Models, Measures, and Methods”, Adaptable and
  221. Adaptive Hypermedia Systems, Chapter 2, Hersley PA
  222. USA: IRM Press, 19-36, (2005).