KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Islamicjerusalem Studies / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Osmanlı İmparatorluğu'nun Çöküşü Sonrasında Orta Doğu'nun Durumu: İstikrarsızlığa Teorik Bir Çözüm

THE SITUATION IN THE “MIDDLE EAST” AFTER THE DECLINE OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: PROVIDING A THEORETICAL SOLUTION FOR THE INSTABILITY

Birkan ERTOY
Sayfa
19–32
Yayın Tarihi
2020-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Moreover, Turkey’s role in the Middle East will be discussed in line with the theoretical perspective of this study

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Instability in the Middle East is a well-known phenomenon and this condition is mostly seen as arising from the rivalry of great powers in the region.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:However, during the time of the Ottoman Empire, there was stability in the region until its decline.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Moreover, Turkey’s role in the Middle East will be discussed in line with the theoretical perspective of this study
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Barakah Circles Theory · Ottoman Empire · Arab World

Abstract

Instability in the Middle East is a well-known phenomenon and this condition is mostly seen as arising from the rivalry of great powers in the region. However, during the time of the Ottoman Empire, there was stability in the region until its decline. After the establishment of nation-states in the region, stability lasted for a while until international powers left. In this sense, what is needed for stability is a power that is able to unite the region states in an inclusivist manner as the Ottoman Empire had previously managed. Even though there is plenty of research about the region, there has been little analysis of the region using a theoretical framework. Additionally, there is no research that uses an Eastern approach since the dominant knowledge is produced by the West. Therefore, this article is an attempt to analyse instability in the region using a new geopolitical theory called Barakah Circles. Moreover, Turkey’s role in the Middle East will be discussed in line with the theoretical perspective of this study

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERTOY, B. (2020). Osmanlı İmparatorluğu'nun Çöküşü Sonrasında Orta Doğu'nun Durumu: İstikrarsızlığa Teorik Bir Çözüm. Journal of Islamicjerusalem Studies, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 19–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/107419

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Abi-Aad, N. & Grenon, M. (1997), Instability and Conflict in the Middle East: People, Petroleum and Security Threats, London: Macmillan Press.
  2. Abu Shakra, E. (2020), “The Future of Syria: We Talk While Others Think”, Asharq al-Awsat, February 17, available at: https://aawsat.com/english/home/article/2135431/eyad-abu-shakra/future-syria-we-talk-while-others-think.
  3. Ayoob, M. (1983), “Security in the Third World: The Worm About to Turn”, International Affairs, 60:1, pp. 41-51.
  4. Ayoob, M. (2008), The Many Faces of Political Islam: Religion and Politics in the Muslim World, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  5. Baram, A. (1990), “Territorial Nationalism in the Middle East”, Middle Eastern Studies, 26:4, pp. 425-448.
  6. Bridge, R. (2020), “Now Iran & Iraq Both Want the US to leave the Middle East, but it Never will”, RT, January 9, available at: https://www.rt.com/op-ed/477842-us-leave-middle-east-iran-iraq/.
  7. Dalacoura, K. (2008), “Democratic Transitions in the Levant: Prospects for Restoring a Regional Order”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 15:60, pp. 31-44.
  8. Eagleton, T. (1990), “Nationalism: Irony and Commitment”, In Nationalism, Colonialism and Literature, edited by: Terry Eagleton, Fredric Jameson & Edward W. Said, 23-39, Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
  9. El-Awaisi, Abd al-Fattah. (2016), Beytülmakdis Bereket Daireleri Teorisi: Yeni Bir Jeopolitik Teori, translated by: Emine Nur Kafalı, Kübra Arslan & Kübra Türk, İstanbul:
  10. Pelikan Basım. El-Awaisi, Abd al-Fattah. (2019), Beytülmakdis ve Geleceğimizin İnşası: Uluslararası İlişkilerde Yeni Bir Tasavvura Doğru, translated by: Emine Nur Kafalı, Kübra Arslan & Kübra Türk, İstanbul: Beytülmakdis Çalışmaları Vakfı-İHH. El-Awaisi, Khalid. (2007), Mapping Islamicjerusalem: A Rediscovery of Geographical Boundaries, Dundee: Al-Maktoum Institute Academic Press.
  11. Ehteshami, A. (2007), Globalization and Geopolitics in the Middle East: Old Games, New Rule, Oxon: Routledge. Ergul Jorgensen, A. A. (2019), “The Middle East: Between Myth and Reality”, Global Affairs, 5:1, pp. 81-88.
  12. Gopin, M. (2002),
  13. Holy War, Holy Peace: How Religion Bring Peace to the Middle East, New York: Oxford University Press.
  14. Green, D. & Luehrmann, L. (2011), Comparative Politics of the Third World: Linking Concepts and Cases [Third Edition], London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  15. Hathaway, J. The Arab Lands Under Ottoman Rule, 1516-1800. Oxon: Pearson, 2008.
  16. Hinnebusch, R. (2017), “Revisiting the 1967 Arab-Israeli War and its Consequences for the Regional Sy