KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Adam Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2

Hâfıza, Dezenformasyonun/Yanlış Bilginin Yayılmasının Sebeplerinden Biri Olabilir Mi? Filistin Haberlerinin Seri Yeniden Üretimi Üzerine Bir Uygulama

Could Memory Be One of the Reasons for the Spread of Disinformation/Misinformation?

Ozan Kocabaş(İnönü Üniversitesi)0000-0003-4966-7730
Sayfa
543–588
Yayın Tarihi
2025-12-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Analiz sonucunda seri yeniden üretim sürecinde haberlerdeki ifadelerin genelleştirildiği, çıkarmalar yoluyla yoğunlaştırıldığı veya anlamsızlaştırıldığı ve zaman zaman ifadelerin tümüyle değiştirilerek haberin anlamının kırıldığı tespit edilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bartlett’in rasyonelleştirme, seviyeleme ve keskinleştirme kavramlarıyla tanımladığı hâfıza yanılgılarının haber aktarımında nasıl ortaya çıktığını gözlemlemek ve bunların hakikat sonrası tartışmalarının esasını oluşturan dezenformasyon ve yanlış bilgi ile olan ilişkisini anlamak bu çalışmanın amacıdır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Gönüllü 48 kişi arasından anket ile seçilen 40 katılımcı rastgele 5’li 8 insan zincirine ayrılmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Analiz sonucunda seri yeniden üretim sürecinde haberlerdeki ifadelerin genelleştirildiği, çıkarmalar yoluyla yoğunlaştırıldığı veya anlamsızlaştırıldığı ve zaman zaman ifadelerin tümüyle değiştirilerek haberin anlamının kırıldığı tespit edilmiştir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:40 katılımcı
⚙️Değişkenler:Hafıza · Dezenformasyon · Seri Yeniden Üretim

Özet

Bartlett’in rasyonelleştirme, seviyeleme ve keskinleştirme kavramlarıyla tanımladığı hâfıza yanılgılarının haber aktarımında nasıl ortaya çıktığını gözlemlemek ve bunların hakikat sonrası tartışmalarının esasını oluşturan dezenformasyon ve yanlış bilgi ile olan ilişkisini anlamak bu çalışmanın amacıdır. Çalışma nitel bir desende tasarlanmış ve çalışmada Bartlett’in geliştirdiği seri yeniden üretim metodu kullanılmıştır. Gönüllü 48 kişi arasından anket ile seçilen 40 katılımcı rastgele 5’li 8 insan zincirine ayrılmıştır. Filistin ve İsrail yanlısı olmak üzere iki farklı haberin her bir zincirdeki seri yeniden üretimi nitel içerik analiziyle tahlil edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda seri yeniden üretim sürecinde haberlerdeki ifadelerin genelleştirildiği, çıkarmalar yoluyla yoğunlaştırıldığı veya anlamsızlaştırıldığı ve zaman zaman ifadelerin tümüyle değiştirilerek haberin anlamının kırıldığı tespit edilmiştir.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine how memory errors, defined by Bartlett through the concepts of rationalization, leveling, and sharpening, emerge in news transmission, and to explore their relationship to disinformation and misinformation, which constitute the basis of post-truth debates. The study adopted a qualitative design, employing Bartlett’s serial reproduction method. Forty participants, selected via questionnaire from among 48 volunteers, were randomly assigned to 8 chains of 5 individuals. The serial reproduction of two different news items, one pro-Palestinian and one pro-Israeli, within each chain was analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The findings indicate that during the process of serial reproduction, news expressions were often generalized, condensed, or rendered meaningless through omissions, while in some cases their meaning was fractured by completely altering the expressions

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kocabaş, O. (2025). Hâfıza, Dezenformasyonun/Yanlış Bilginin Yayılmasının Sebeplerinden Biri Olabilir Mi? Filistin Haberlerinin Seri Yeniden Üretimi Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Adam Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 543–588. https://doi.org/10.31679/adamakademi.1524733

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (141)

  1. Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  2. Allport, G. W., & Postman, L. (1947). The psychology of rumor. Henry Holt.
  3. Allport, G. W., & Postman, L. J. (1945). Section of Psychology: The Basic Psychology of Rumor. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 8(2 Series II), 61-81.
  4. Alper, T. G., & Korchin, S. J. (1952). Memory for Socially Relevant Material. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47(1), 25.
  5. Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational Schemas and the Processing of Social Information. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 461-484.
  6. Banaji, M. R., & Crowder, R. G. (1989). The Bankruptcy of Everyday Memory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1185-1193.
  7. Bangerter, A. (2000). Transformation Between Scientific and Social Representations of Conception: The Method of Serial Reproduction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 521-535.
  8. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Barton, C. C. (2019). Critical Literacy in the Post-Truth Media Landscape. Policy Futures in Education, 17(8), 1024-1036.
  10. Barzilai, S., & Chinn, C. A. (2020). A Review of Educational Responses to the “Post-Truth” Condition: Four Lenses on “Post-Truth” Problems. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 107-119.
  11. Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Free Press.
  12. Bodaghi, A., & Oliveira, J. (2020). The Characteristics of Rumor Spreaders on Twitter: A Quantitative Analysis on Real Data. Computer Communications, 160, 674-687.
  13. Brewer, W. F. (2000). Bartlett’s Concept of the Schema and Its Impact on Theories of Knowledge Representation in Contemporary Cognitive Psychology. Bartlett, culture and cognition (69-89). Psychology Press.
  14. Broersma, M. (2010). The Unbearable Limitations of Journalism: On Press Critique and Journalism’s Claim to Truth. International Communication Gazette, 72(1), 21-33.
  15. Brown, R., & McNeill, D. (1966). The “Tip of the Tongue” Phenomenon. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 5(4), 325-337.
  16. Bülbül, A. R. (2001). Haberin anatomisi ve temel yaklaşımlar. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  17. Cangöz, B. (2005). Geçmişten Günümüze Belleği Açıklamaya Yönelik Yaklaşımlara Kısa Bir Bakış. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1), 51-62.
  18. Cartwright, D. (1953). Analysis of Qualitative Material. Research Methods in theBehavioral Sciences (421-470). Niles.
  19. Cassidy, A. (2023). UK says it believes Al-Ahli Baptist Hospital blast was “likely caused” by missile fired from inside Gaza. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/europe/live-news/israel-hamas-war-gaza-news-10-23-23/index.html [17.02.2024).
  20. Chance, M. (2023). The “IDF does not target hospitals,” Netanyahu spokesperson says. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/middleeast/live-news/israel-news-hamas-war-10-17-23/h_c62922a1d06cabf80620f132c5a33b48 [17.02.2024].
  21. Cherry, K. (2023). What role do schemas play in the learning process? Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-a-schema-2795873 [20.12.2023].
  22. CNN. (2023). October 17, 2023—Israel-Hamas war. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/middleeast/live-news/israel-news-hamas-war-10-17-23/index.html [18.02.2024].
  23. Connelly, L. M. (2016). Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research. Medsurg Nursing: Official Journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses, 25(6), 435-436.
  24. Connerton, P. (1999). Toplumlar nasıl anımsar? Ayrıntı Yayınları. İstanbul.
  25. Coronel, J. C., Ott, J. M., Hubner, A., Sweitzer, M. D., & Lerner, S. (2023). How are Competitive Framing Environments Transformed by Person-to-Person Communication? An Integrated Social Transmission, Content Analysis, and Eye Movement Monitoring Approach. Communication Research, 50(1), 3-29.
  26. Daley, D. J., & Kendall, D. G. (1964). Epidemics and Rumours. Nature, 204(4963), 1118-1118.
  27. DiFonzo, N., & Bordia, P. (2007). Rumor psychology: Social and organizational approaches. American Psychological Association.
  28. Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology. Annals of Neurosciences, 20(4).
  29. Edwards, K., & Smith, E. E. (1996). A Disconfirmation Bias in the Evaluation of Arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 5-24.
  30. Erdelyi, M. H. (1998). The recovery of unconscious memories: hypermnesia and reminiscence. University of Chicago Press. Chicago
  31. Eysenck, M. W., Ellis, A. W., Hunt, E. B., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. E. (1994). The Blackwell dictionary of cognitive psychology. Basil Blackwell.
  32. Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2020). Cognitive psychology: A student’s handbook (Eighth edition). Routledge.
  33. Fallis, D. (2015). What is Disinformation?. Library Trends, 63(3), 401-426.
  34. Ferreira, L., Collins, E. C., Fasoli, F., Silva, C., & Lopes, D. (2015). Using Serial Reproduction Methodology to Examine Communication in Organizations. Actas do VIII Simpósio Sobre Comportamento Organizacional, 8-23.
  35. Fiedler, K., Asbeck, J., & Nickel, S. (1991). Mood and Constructive Memory Effects on Social Judgement. Cognition & Emotion, 5(5-6), 363-378.
  36. Fiske, S. T., & Kinder, D. R. (1981). Involvement, Expertise, and Schema Use: Evidence from Political Cognition. Personality, Cognitions, and Social Interaction (171-190). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  37. Flower, K., Pokharel, S., Gold, H., Kolirin, L., & Given, M. (2023). IDF says Palestinian Islamic Jihad group is behind “failed rocket launch” that struck Gaza hospital. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/middleeast/live-news/israel-news-hamas-war-10-17-23/h_c62922a1d06cabf80620f132c5a33b48 [19.02.2024].
  38. Fortin, N. (2008). Navigation and Episodic-Like Memory in Mammals. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference (385-412). Elsevier.
  39. Frise, M. (2018). Forgetting. New Directions in the Philosophy of Memory (223-240). Routledge.
  40. Fuller, S. (2018). Post-truth: Knowledge as a power game. Anthem Press. London.
  41. Galeotti, A. E. (2019). Believing Fake News. Pos-Truth, Philosophy and Law. (58-76). New York: Routledge.
  42. Ghosh, V. E., & Gilboa, A. (2014). What is a Memory Schema? A Historical Perspective on Current Neuroscience Literature. Neuropsychologia, 53, 104-114.
  43. Gilovich, T. (1987). Secondhand information and Social Judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23(1), 59-74.
  44. Glăveanu, V. P. (2017). Psychology in the Post-Truth Era. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 13(3), 375-377.
  45. Gold, H. (2023). Israeli prime minister says “barbaric terrorists in Gaza” attacked hospital, not the IDF. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/middleeast/live-news/israel-news-hamas-war-10-17 23/h_c62922a1d06cabf80620f132c5a33b48 [20.02.2024].
  46. Graber, D. A. (1988). Processing the news: How people tame the information tide. New York: Longman.
  47. Halbwachs, M. (2007). Kollektif Bellek ve Zaman. Bellek: Öncesiz Sonrasız, Cogito, 50, 55-76.
  48. Hancock, J. T. (2007). Digital Deception: When, Where and How People Lie Online. Oxford Handbook Of Iternet Psychology (pp. 289–301). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  49. Harsin, J. (2018). Post-Truth and Critical Communication Studies. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication (35-52). Oxford University Press.
  50. Healy, A. F., & Bonk, W. J. (2008). Serial Learning. Learning and Memory A Comphrehensive Reference (53-63). Elsevier.
  51. Hernon, P. (1995). Disinformation and Misinformation Through the İnternet: Findings of an Exploratory Study. Government Information Quarterly, 12(2), 133–139.
  52. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
  53. Huang, J. (2022). Rumor and Conspiracy Formation in Post Truth Era Under Covıd-19. International Conference on Comprehensive Art and Cultural Communication (CACC 2022). Chongqing: China.
  54. Ireton, C, & Posetti, J. (2018). Journalism, fake news & disinformation: handbook for journalism education and training. Unesco Publishing.
  55. Jackendoff, R. (2019). Conceptual Semantics. Semantics—Theories (86-113). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
  56. Jones, E. E., & Kohler, R. (1958). The Effects of Plausibility on the Learning of Controversial Statements. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 57(3), 315.
  57. Juul, J. L., & Ugander, J. (2021). Comparing Information Diffusion Mechanisms by Matching on Cascade Size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(46).
  58. Kashima, Y. (2014). Meaning, Grounding, and the Construction of Social Reality: Grounding and Social Reality. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17(2), 81-95.
  59. Kashima, Y., & Yeung, V. W.-L. (2010). Serial Reproduction: An Experimental Simulation of Cultural Dynamics. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42(1), 56-71.
  60. Kawachi, K. (2008). Deterministic Models for Rumor Transmission. Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 9(5), 1989-2028.
  61. Kemiksiz, N. (2016). Filistin Sorunu. Akademik Ortadoğu, 11(1), 133-179.
  62. Khatib, I., Canetti, D., & Rubin, A. (2018). Conflict Perception: A New Scale with Evidence from Israel and Palestine. International Journal of Conflict Management, 29(3), 376-397.
  63. Kocabaş, O., & Çetin, S. (2015). Y Gençlik ve Dijtal Aktivizmi: Ankara Tuzluçayır Örneği. İstanbul Kadir Has Üniversite Yeni Medya Çalışmaları II. Ulusal Kongre Kitabı (67-79). Alternatif Bilişim Derneği. İstanbul.
  64. Kocabaş, O. (2020). Hâfıza Mekânı Olarak Roman: Yeşil Gece Romanında Tahakküm, Değişim ve Bellek. İNİF E - Dergi., 5(2), 60-72.
  65. Kocabaş, O. (2021). Haberde doğruluk ve hakîkat: Haber doğruluk-hakîkat ilişkisinin hermeneutik tezâhürleri üzerine bir deneme. Akademisyen Kitabevi. Ankara
  66. Kocabaş, O. (2022). ‪Hakikate “Tıklamak”: Hakikat-Sonrası Durum ve Okuryazarlık‬. Dijital Medya Okuryazarlığı (35-81). Nobel Akademik.‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬ Ankara‬‬‬‬
  67. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and Control Processes in The Strategic Regulation of Memory Accuracy. Psychological Review, 103(3), 490-517.
  68. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.
  69. Lakoff, G. (1986). Cognitive Semantics in Meaning and Mental Representations. Versus, (44-45), 119-154.
  70. Laybats, C., & Tredinnick, L. (2016). Post Truth, Information, and Emotion. Business Information Review, 33(4), 204-206.
  71. Lee, T. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Kashima, Y. (2014). The Serial Reproduction of Conflict: Third Parties Escalate Conflict Through Communication Biases. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, (54), 68-72.
  72. Levine, J. M., & Murphy, G. (1943). The Learning and Forgetting of Controversial Material. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38(4), 507-517.
  73. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
  74. Liu, Y., Zeng, C., & Luo, Y. (2018). Dynamics of a New Rumor Propagation Model with the Spread of Truth. Applied Mathematics, 09(05), 536-549.
  75. Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading Questions and the Eyewitness Report. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 560-572.
  76. Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Harvard Univ. Press.
  77. Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson Education Limited.
  78. Lynch, F. R., Rosnow, R. L., & Fine, G. A. (1978). Rumor and Gossip: The Social Psychology of Hearsay. Contemporary Sociology, 7(2), 212.
  79. Lyons, A., & Kashima, Y. (2001). The Reproduction of Culture: Communication Processes Tend to Maintain Cultural Stereotypes. Social Cognition, 19(3), 372-394.
  80. Lyons, A., & Kashima, Y. (2003). How are stereotypes maintained through communication? The influence of stereotype sharedness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 989-1005.
  81. Lyons, A., & Kashima, Y. (2006). Maintaining stereotypes in communication: Investigating memory biases and coherence‐seeking in storytelling. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9(1), 59-71.
  82. Manning, M. J., Manning, M., & Romerstein, H. (2004). Historical dictionary of American propaganda. West Port, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
  83. Marconi, D. (2019). Fake News, The Crisis of Deference, and Epistemic Democracy. Pos-Truth, Philosophy and Law. (86-92). New York: Routledge.
  84. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage publications.
  85. Matsumoto, D. R. (Ed.). (2009). The Cambridge dictionary of psychology. Cambridge University Press.
  86. McCluskey, M. (2023). Israeli President blames Islamic Jihad for Al-Ahli Baptist Hospital blast. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/middleeast/live-news/israel-news-hamas-war-10-17-23/index.html [25.02.2024). McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  87. McIntyre, A., Lyons, A., Clark, A., & Kashima, Y. (2004). The Microgenesis of Culture: Serial Reproduction as an Experimental Simulation of Cultural Dynamics. The Psychological Foundations of Culture (227-258). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  88. Menzel, R. (2008). Introduction and Overview. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference. (1-9). Elsevier. Miller, G. R., & Stiff, J. B. (1993). Deceptive communication. Sage Publications.
  89. Nadel, L. (2008). Multiple Memory Systems: A New View. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference (41-51). Elsevier.
  90. Nahari, G., Sheinfeld, V., Glicksohn, J., & Nachson, I. (2015). Serial Reproduction of Traumatic Events: Does the Chain Unravel? Cognitive Processing, 16(1), 111-120.
  91. Natasha, B. (2023, Ekim 17). Pentagon says “steady flow of weapons” to Israel will continue. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/middleeast/live-news/israel-news-hamas-war-10-17-23/h_c62922a1d06cabf80620f132c5a33b48 [27.02.2024].
  92. Nisan, F. (2022). Haberdeki çerçeve uygulama örnekleriyle çerçeveleme kuramı ve yöntemi. Çizgi Kitabevi. NTV. (2023). 7 soruda İsrail’in Gazze’deki hastane katliamı. https://www.ntv.com.tr/galeri/dunya/7-soruda-israilin-gazzedeki-hastane-katliami,p6ukCmlNbUuDxtuMD1BjbA [3.03.2024].
  93. Ost, J., Udell, J., Dear, S., Zinken, J., Blank, H., & Costall, A. (2022). The serial reproduction of an urban myth: Revisiting Bartlett’s schema theory. Memory, 30(6), 775-783.
  94. Özakpınar, Y. (1997). Hafıza. Kubbealtı Neşriyatı.İstanbul.
  95. Özakpınar, Y. (2010). Hafıza yanılmaları ve iki ayrı hafıza kodu teorisi. Ötüken Neşriyat. İstanbul.
  96. Patton, M. Q. (2018). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri. Pegem Akademik Yayınları.Ankara.
  97. Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The Psychology of Fake News. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388-402.
  98. Prado, C. G. (Ed.). (2018). America’s post-truth phenomenon: When feelings and opinions trump facts and evidence. Praeger.
  99. Pröllochs, N., Bär, D., & Feuerriegel, S. (2021). Emotions Explain Differences in the Diffusion of True vs. False Social Media Rumors. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 22721.
  100. Qazvinian, V., Rosengren, E., Radev, D. R., & Mei, Q. (2011). Rumor Has It: Identifying Misinformation in Microblogs. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (1589-1599). Association for Computational Linguistics.
  101. Riegler, A. (2005). Constructive Memory. Kybernetes, 34(1/2), 89-104.
  102. Roediger, H. L. (1980). Memory Metaphors in Cognitive Psychology. Memory & Cognition, 8(3), 231-246.
  103. Roediger, H. L. (2003). Bartlett, Frederic Charles. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. (1). 319-322.
  104. Roediger, H. L., Zaromb, F. M., & Goode, M. K. (2008). A Typology of Memory Terms. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference. (11-24). Elsevier.
  105. Rosnow, R. L., & Fine, G. A. (1976). Rumor and gossip: The social psychology of hearsay. Elsevier.
  106. Sara, S. J. (2008). Reconsolidation: Historical Perspective and Theoretical Aspects. Learning And Memory: A Comprehensive Reference (461-473). Elsevier.
  107. Schachter, S., & Burdick, H. (1955). A Field Experiment on Rumor Transmission and Distortion. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 50(3), 363-371.
  108. Schutz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1974). The structures of the life-world. Northwestern University Press.
  109. Severin, W., & Tankard, J. W. (2014). Communication theories: Origins, methods and uses in mass media. Pearson Education.
  110. Shibutani, T. (1966). Improvised news: A sociological study of rumor. Bobbs-Merrill.
  111. Shin, J., Jian, L., Driscoll, K., & Bar, F. (2017). Political Rumoring on Twitter During the 2012 US Presidential Election: Rumor Diffusion and Correction. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1214-1235.
  112. Sismondo, S. (2018). Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Manipula Tion of Crowds. America’s Post-Truth Phenomenon (72-86). Praeger.
  113. Smith, C. P. (2000). Content Analysis and Narrative Analysis. Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology (313-335). Cambridge University Press.
  114. Soll, J. (2016). The long and brutal history of fake news. www.politico. com/magazine/story/2016/12/fake-news-history-long-violent- 214535/. (Erişim tarihi: 24.02.2025).
  115. Spiegelhalter, D., J. (2019). Trust in Numbers. Risk and Uncertainty in a Post-Truth Society (4-25). Routledge. Stafford, L., Waldron, V. R., & Infield, L. L. (1989). Actor-Observer Differences in Conversational Memory. Human Communication Research, 15(4), 590-611.
  116. Statt, D. A. (1998). The concise dictionary of psychology. Routledge.
  117. Sunstein, C. R. (2014). On rumors: How falsehoods spread, why we believe them, and what can be done. Princeton University Press.
  118. Şentuna, B., Han, B., & Kılınç Olgaç, B. (2023). Post Truth ve İsrail-Filistin Savaşı. Sosyal Aktörler ve Deneyimler Dergisi (1), 3-9.
  119. Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769.
  120. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making Sense of Cronbach’s Alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55.
  121. Tenny, S., Brannan, J. M., & Brannan, G. D. (2017). Qualitative study. StatPearls Publishing.
  122. Thompson, M. S., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (2000). The Consequences of Communicating Social Stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(6), 567-599.
  123. Treadway, M., & McCloskey, M. (1987). Cite Unseen: Distortions of the Allport and Postman Rumor Study in the Eyewitness Testimony Literature. Law and Human Behavior, 11(1), 19-25.
  124. TRT Haber. (2024a). ABD’li asker İsrail’in Washington Büyükelçiliği önünde Gazze için kendini yaktı. https://www.trthaber.com/haber/dunya/abdli-asker-israilin-washington-buyukelciligi-onunde-gazze-icin-kendini-yakti-840089.html [05.03.2024].
  125. TRT Haber. (2024b). Hamas: Gazze için kendini yakan ABD’li askerin ölümünden Washington sorumlu. https://www.trthaber.com/haber/dunya/hamas-gazze-icin-kendini-yakan-abdli-askerin-olumunden-washington-sorumlu-840342.html [05.03.2024].
  126. TRT Haber. (2024c). ABD, Gazze’ye destek için kendini yakan ABD’li askerin tepkisinin “derinliğinin” anlaşıldığını belirtti. https://www.trthaber.com/haber/dunya/abd-gazzeye-destek-icin-kendini-yakan-abdli-askerin-tepkisinin-derinliginin-anlasildigini-belirtti-840627.html [05.03.2024].
  127. TRT Haber. (2024d). Gazze için kendini yakan ABD’li askerin “ordunun Filistin’deki soykırıma dahline” dair belgeler gördüğü iddiası. https://www.trthaber.com/haber/dunya/gazze-icin-kendini-yakan-abdli-askerin-ordunun-filistindeki-soykirima-dahline-dair-belgeler-gordugu-iddiasi-840718.html [06.03.2024].
  128. Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and Semantic Memory. Organization of Memory (381-403). Academic Press.
  129. Tulving, E. (2007). Are There 256 Different Kinds of Memory?. The Foundations of Remembering (39-52). Psychology Press.
  130. Urban, W. M. (2014). Language and reality: The philosophy of language and the principles of symbolism. Routledge.
  131. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The Spread of True and False News Online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151.
  132. Wagoner, B. (2010). Remembering Methodology Experimenting with Bartlett. Methodological Thinking in Psychology: 60 Years Gone Astray? (145-187). Information Age Publ.
  133. Wagoner, B. (2017). What Makes Memory Constructive? A Study in the Serial Reproduction of Bartlett’s Experiments. Culture & Psychology, 23(2), 186-207.
  134. Waisbord, S. (2018). Truth is What Happens to News: On Journalism, Fake News, and Post-Truth. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1866-1878.
  135. Wierzchoslawski, R. P. (2021). The Post-Truth Condition and Social Distribution of Knowledge: On Some Dilemmas with Post-Truth Uses. History in a Post- Truth World (66-84). Routledge.
  136. Xu, J., & Griffiths, T. L. (2010). A Rational Analysis of the Effects of Memory Biases on Serial Reproduction. Cognitive Psychology, 60(2), 107-126.
  137. Yiğit, A. A. (2019). Filistin Meselesinin Kronikleşmesi (1918-1948). Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları, 123(243), 391-414.
  138. Yıldırım, Y. (2021). İsrail-Filistin Sorununda İki Devletli Çözüm Arayışları. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(41), 3840-3884.
  139. Zacks, J. M., Bezdek, M. A., & Cunningham, G. E. (2022). Knowledge and the Reliability of Constructive Memory. Memory, 30(1), 22-25.
  140. Zhao, L., Wang, Q., Cheng, J., Chen, Y., Wang, J., & Huang, W. (2011). Rumor Spreading Model with Consideration of Forgetting Mechanism: A Case of Online Blogging Livejournal. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 390(13), 2619-2625.
  141. Kocabaş, O. (2020). Hâfıza Mekânı Olarak Roman: Yeşil Gece Romanında Tahakküm, Değişim ve Bellek. İNİF E - Dergi., 5(2), 60-72.