KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2

GELIŞMIŞ VE GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKELERDE KAMU-ÖZEL ORTAKLIKLARI: BİRLEŞİK KRALLIK VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEKLERİ

PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IN DEVELOPING AND DEVELOPED COUNTRIES: THE UK AND TURKISH CASES

Burcu Kahyaoğulları
Sayfa
243–276
Yayın Tarihi
2013-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings indicate that the PPP policy of developing and developed countries differs within five aspects: (i) how the policy penetrates into the political agenda, (ii) the government’s aim in adopting PPP policy, (iii) the sectoral distribution, (iv) the form of PPP’s and (v) the regulatory framework.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study sets out to determine whether the process of adoption and implementation of PPP policy differs between developing and developed countries.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Hence, by conducting an in-depth conceptual interrogation, first of all a template is formed to determine certain dissimilarities between developing and developed countries.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings indicate that the PPP policy of developing and developed countries differs within five aspects: (i) how the policy penetrates into the political agenda, (ii) the government’s aim in adopting PPP policy, (iii) the sectoral distribution, (iv) the form of PPP’s and (v) the regulatory framework.
🔬Tür:Makale
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Kamu-özel ortaklığı politikası · gelişmekte olan ülkeler · gelişmiş ülkeler

Abstract

This study sets out to determine whether the process of adoption and implementation of PPP policy differs between developing and developed countries. Hence, by conducting an in-depth conceptual interrogation, first of all a template is formed to determine certain dissimilarities between developing and developed countries. Then using this template, Turkey, as a developing country, and the UK, as a developed country, is examined in order to set forth the relationship between the development level of a country and its PPP policy. The findings indicate that the PPP policy of developing and developed countries differs within five aspects: (i) how the policy penetrates into the political agenda, (ii) the government’s aim in adopting PPP policy, (iii) the sectoral distribution, (iv) the form of PPP’s and (v) the regulatory framework.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kahyaoğulları, B. (2013). GELIŞMIŞ VE GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKELERDE KAMU-ÖZEL ORTAKLIKLARI: BİRLEŞİK KRALLIK VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEKLERİ. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 243–276. https://ajindex.com/articles/1060610

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (39)

  1. ABDEL, A., (2007). Successful Delivery of Public-Private Partnerships for Infrastructure Development. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 133(12): 918-931.
  2. ANKARA METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY, (2011). „Kamu Özel Sektör İşbirliğinde İngiltere Deneyimleri Paylaşıldı‟ (Sharing UK Experiences Regarding
  3. http://www.melihgokcek.com/kamu_ozel_sektor_isbirliginde_ingilte PPPs). re_deneyimleri_paylasildi-89.html Accessed: 16th of July 2012.
  4. APPUHAMI, R., Perera, S. & PERERA H., (2011). Coercive Policy Diffusion in a Developing Country: The Case of Public-Private Partnerships in Sri-Lanka. Journal of Contemporary Asia. 41(3): 431-451.
  5. BARNEKOV, T. & RICH, D., (1989). Privatism and the Limits of Local Economic Development Policy. Urban Affairs Quarterly. 25(2): 212
  6. BETTIGNIES J., E., & THOMAS, W., R., (2004). The Economics of Public-Private Partnerships. Canadian Public Policy. 30(2): 135-154.
  7. BHATIA, B. & GUPTA, N., (2006). Lifting Constraints to Public- Private Partnerships in South Asia. PPPIAF Gridlines. Note No. 6, May 2006.
  8. BOASE, J., P., (2000). Beyond Government? The Appeal of Public- Private Partnerships. Canadian Public Administration. 43(1): 75-92.
  9. BOVAIRD, T. & TIZARD, J., (2009). Partnership Working in the Public Domain. In Public Management and Governance, ed. T. Bovaird & E. Löffler. London and New York: Routledge-Taylor and Francis Group.
  10. BROADBENT, J., Gray, A. & JACKSON, P., (2003). Public-Private Partnerships. Public Money and Management. 23(3): 135-136.
  11. BROADBENT, J. & LAUGHLIN, R., (2005). Government Concerns and Tensions in Accounting Standard-Setting: The Case of Accounting for Private Finance Initiative in the UK. Accounting and Business Research. 35(3): 207-228.
  12. CAMPBELL, J., L., (1998).Institutional Analysis and the Role of Ideas in Political Economy. Theory and Society. 27(3): 377-409.
  13. CAMPBELL, J., L., (2004). Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  14. CARROLL, P. & STEANE P., (2000). Public-Private Partnerships: Sectoral Perspectives. In Public-Private Partnerships: Theory and Practice in International Perspective, ed. S. P. Osborne. London and New York: Routledge-Taylor and Francis Group.
  15. CHAN, C., FORWOOD, D., ROPER, H., & SAYERS, C., (2009). Public Infrastructure Financing: An International Perspective. Productivity Commission, Australia: Working Paper.
  16. CUMMING, S., Koebel, T. &WHITE, A., (1988). Public-Private Partnerships and Public Enterprise. Urban Resources. 5(1): 35-36, 47-48.
  17. CYPHER, J., M. & DIETZ, J., L., (2009). The Process of Economic Development. London and New York: Routledge-Taylor and Francis Group. Third Edition.
  18. DEMIRBAŞ, M. & TÜRKOĞLU, M., (2002). Kamu İktisadi Teşebbüslerinin Özelleştirilmesi (Privatizing State Owned Enterprises). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi. 7(1): 241-264.
  19. Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR), (1999). Local Government Act 1999: Part I Best Value. Circular 10/99. London: DETR.
  20. EEL, (2012). PPP in Turkey: Financing Future Infrastructure.
  21. http://www.eelevents.co.uk/ppp_in_turkey_2012/programme- highlights.html Accessed: 28th of June 2012.
  22. EKER, A., Y., (2007). Kamu Özel Sektör Ortaklıkları (Public Private Sector Partnerships). Bütçe Dünyası. 2(25): 59-67.
  23. EMEK, U., (2002). Yap-İşlet-Devret, Yap-İşlet ve Kamu Hizmeti İmtiyazı Mevzuatı (Regulations on BOT‟s, BO‟s and Concessions). State Planning Organization.
  24. ENGLISH, L. & GUTHRIE J., (2003). Driving Privately Financed Projects in Australia: What Makes Them Tick? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. 16(3): 493-511.
  25. EROĞLU, N. & EROĞLU, I., (2009). IMF-Türkiye İlişkileri ve 20. Stand-By Relationships and an Evaluation of the 20. Stand-By Negotiations). KMÜİİBF Dergisi. 11(17): 124-146.
  26. ENTWISTLE, T. & MARTIN, S., (2005). From Competition to Collaboration in Public Service Delivery: A New Agenda for Research. Public Administration. 83(1): 233-242.
  27. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, (2003). Guidelines for Successful Public-Private Partnerships. European Commission Directorate General Regional Policy, March 2003.
  28. European Investment Bank (EIB), (2007). Public Private Partnerships in Europe. Economic and Financial Report 2007/3.
  29. FALCONER, P., K. & MCLAUGHLIN, K., (2000). Public-Private Partnerships and the „New Labour‟ Government in Britain. In Public-Private Partnerships: Theory and Practice in International Perspective, ed. S. P. Osborne. London and New York: Routledge-Taylor and Francis Group.
  30. FEIGENBAUM, H., Henig, J. & HAMNETT, C., (1998). Shrinking the State: The Political Underpinnings of Privatization. Cambridge University Press.
  31. FISCHBACHER, M. & BEAUMONT, P., (2003). PFI, Public- Private Partnerships and the Neglected Importance of Process: Stakeholders and the Employment Dimension. Public Money and Management. 23(3): 171-177.
  32. FLINDERS, M., (2005). The Politics of Public-Private Partnerships. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 7(2): 215-239.
  33. GRIMSEY, D. & LEWIS, M., K., (2004). Public Private Partnerships: The Worldwide Revolution in Infrastructure Provision and Project Finance. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
  34. GRIMSHAW, D., Vincent S. & WILLMOTT, H., (2002). Going Privately: Partnerships and Outsourcing in UK Public Services. Public Administration. 80(3): 475-502.
  35. HAY, C., (2002). Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction. New York, NY: Palgrave.
  36. HARRIS, S., (2007). Public Private Partnerships: Delivering Better Infrastructure Services. Inter-American Development Bank. Sustainable Development Department.
  37. HEALD, D., (1997). Privately Financed Capital in Public Services. The Manchester School. 65(5): 568-598.
  38. HEALD, D. & GEORGIOU, G., (2011). The Substance of Accounting for Public-Private Partnerships. Financial Accountability & Management. 27(2): 217-247.
  39. HM TREASURY, (2012). UK Private Finance Initiative Projects: March