KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1

Adil geçiş kavramı üzerine bibliyometrik bir analiz

A bibliometric analysis on the concept of just transition

Ali İhsan Çelen(Ordu Üniversitesi)0000-0002-8009-3432
Sayfa
1–20
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-19
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Sonuç olarak; adil geçiş kavramı multidisipliner bir özelliğe sahiptir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Adil geçiş kavramının literatürdeki yerini ve gelişimini incelemek, çalışmanın temel amacını oluşturmaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Herhangi bir kısıtlama olmadan Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanındaki tüm dizinler dikkate alınmıştır. 04.07.2025 tarihinde WoS Core Collection veri tabanında “Just Transition” kavramı taratılmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Sonuç olarak; adil geçiş kavramı multidisipliner bir özelliğe sahiptir.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2025 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Adil geçiş · İklim politikaları · Bibliyometrik analiz

Özet

Adil geçiş kavramının literatürdeki yerini ve gelişimini incelemek, çalışmanın temel amacını oluşturmaktadır. Herhangi bir kısıtlama olmadan Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanındaki tüm dizinler dikkate alınmıştır. 04.07.2025 tarihinde WoS Core Collection veri tabanında “Just Transition” kavramı taratılmıştır. Yapılan aramada 1.343 dokümana ulaşılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler VOSviewer 1.6.20 haritalama tekniği ile analiz edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak; adil geçiş kavramı multidisipliner bir özelliğe sahiptir. Enerji politikaları, demokrasi, eşitlik ve adalet kavramları ile şekillenmektedir. Yerelden küresele etkin paydaş katılımı, iş birliği ve koordinasyon gerektirmektedir. Gelişmiş ülkeler ve fosil yakıt temelli ülkelerde önem kazanmıştır. Gelişiminde COP-24 ve Covid-19 temel kırılma noktalarıdır. Yapılan çalışmalar çoğunlukla makale niteliğindedir. McCauley, Kortetmaki, Kaljonen, Tribaldes, Heffron, Huttunen, Sovacool, Newell, vd. en etkin araştırmacılardır. Adil geçiş, fosil yakıt temelli yapısı ve klasikleşmiş sosyal politika sorunları ile Türkiye’de multidisipliner bir çalışma alanı sunmaktadır. Yapılan çalışma, önemli bir yol haritası niteliğindedir.

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to examine the place and development of the concept of just transition in literature. All indexes in the Web of Science (WoS) database were considered without any restrictions. The concept of "Just Transition" was searched in the WoS Core Collection database on July 4, 2025. 1,343 documents were obtained in this search. The data obtained were analyzed with VOSviewer 1.6.20 mapping tecnique. In conclusion, the concept of just transition has a multidisciplinary character. It is shaped by the concepts of energy policies, democracy, equality, and justice. It requires effective stakeholder participation, cooperation, and coordination from local to global levels. It has gained importance in developed countries and fossil fuel-based countries. COP-24 and Covid-19 are key turning points in its development. The studies conducted are mostly articles. McCauley, Kortetmaki, Kaljonen, Tribaldes, Heffron, Huttunen, Sovacool, Newell, and others are among the most influential researchers. Just transition, offers a multidisciplinary field of study in Turkey with its fossil fuel-based structure and classic social policy issues. So, this study serves as an important roadmap.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Çelen, A. İ. (2026). Adil geçiş kavramı üzerine bibliyometrik bir analiz. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.33707/akuiibfd.1747814

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (65)

  1. Aklin, M., & Urpelainen, J. (2013). Political Competition, Path Dependence, and the Strategy of Sustainable Energy Transitions. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 643-658. doi:10.1111/ajps.12002
  2. Aydın, N. (2024). Bibliyometrik Analiz Nasıl Yapılır: Genel Bakış. Balkan ve Yakın Doğu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10, 153-160.
  3. Burandt, T., Xiong, B., Löffler, K., & Oei, P. (2019). Decarbonizing China's energy system - Modeling the transformation of the electricity, transportation, heat, and industrial sectors. Applied Energy, 255, 113820. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113820
  4. Carley, S., & Konisky, D. M. (2020). The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition. Nat Energy, 569-577. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0641-6
  5. Castree, N., Adams, W., Barry, J.,.., & Newell, P. (2014). Changing the intellectual climate. Nature Climate Change, 4(9), 763-768. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE2339
  6. Cha, J., Stevis, D., Vachon, T., Price, V., & Brescia-Weiler, M. (2022). A Green New Deal for all: The centrality of a worker and community-led just transition in the US. Political Geography, 95, 102594. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102594
  7. CISIS&CIF. (2025, 6 Haziran). Just transition concepts and relevance for climate action: A preliminary framework. https://www.cif.org/sites/cif_enc/files/knowledge-documents/justtransition_final.pdf.
  8. Creutzig, F., Roy, J., & Weber, W. L. (2018). Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. Nature Climate Change, 8(4), 268-271. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0121-1.
  9. Demir, A.& Acar, S. (2025). Just transition lessons from coal-dependent regions: A comparative analysis of Newcastle, Australia and Zonguldak, Türkiye. METU Studies in Development, 52 (1), 2025, p. 91-118.
  10. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Muhherje, D., Pandey, N., & Weng, M. L. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
  11. Ebi, K., Hallegatte, S., Kram, T., Winkler, H.,., & Zwickel, T. (2014). A new scenario framework for climate change research: background, process, and future directions. Climatic Change, 122(3), 363-372. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0912-3
  12. EBRD (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development). (2025, 12 Haziran). What is a just transition. https://www.ebrd.com/what-we-do/just-transition.
  13. Ericsson, K., Huttunen, S., Nilsson, L. J., & Svenningsson, P. (2004). Bioenergy policy and market development in Finland and Sweden. Energy Policy, 32(15), 1707-1721. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00161-7
  14. Eurofound. (2025, 24 Haziran). Promoting social cohesion and convergence. s. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/topic/promoting-social-cohesion-and-convergence (Erişim Tarihi: 20.06. 2025).
  15. Fazey, I., Schapke, N., Caniglia, G., Hodgson, A., Kendrick, I., Lyon, C.,. Saha, P. (2020). Transforming knowledge systems for life on Earth: Visions of future systems and how to get there. Energy Research & Social Science, 70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101724.
  16. Genç, M. C.; Ekinci, A. & Sakarya, B. (2021). The impact of output volatility on CO2 emissions in Turkey: testing EKC hypothesis with Fourier stationarity test. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 3008–3021 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15448-3.
  17. Gould, C., & Urpelainen, J. (2018). LPG as a clean cooking fuel: Adoption, use, and impact in rural India. Energy Policy, 122, 395-408. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.042.
  18. Güler, C.&Demirkaya, S. (2024). Sendikalar ve Adil Geçiş: Mevcut Durum, Potansiyel ve Kısıtlar. Türkiye Devrimci İşçi Sendikaları Konfederasyonu (DİSK)& Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe. https://caneurope.org/content/uploads/2024/04/Sendikalar-ve-Adil-Gecis_Yonetici-Ozeti_web.pdf-exe-sum-in-Turkish.pdf.
  19. Heally, N., & barry, J. (2017). Politicizing energy justice and energy system transitions: Fossil fuel divestment and a “just transition”. Energy Policy, 108, 451-459. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.014
  20. Heffron, R. J., & MacCauley, D. (2017). The concept of energy justice across the disciplines. Energy Policy, 105, 658-667. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.018
  21. Heffron, R. J., & McCauley, D. (2018). What is the ‘just transition’? Geoforum, 88. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.016
  22. Heffron, R. J., & McCauley, D. (2022). The ‘just transition’ threat to our Energy and Climate 2030 targets. Energy Policy, 165, 1-5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112949
  23. ILO. (2023a). 111th session: Outcome of the general discussion committee on a just transition. https://www.ilo.org/ (Erişim Tarihi: 01.06.2025).
  24. ILO. (2023b). Report VI: Achieving a just transition towards environmentally sustainable economies and societes for all. https://www.ilo.org/ (Erişim Tarihi: 01.06.2025).
  25. Kivimaa, P., Laakso, S., Lonkila, A., & Kaljonen, M. (2021). Moving beyond disruptive innovation: A review of disruption in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 38, 110-126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.12.001
  26. Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F.,..., & Sovacool, B. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Social Transitions, 1-32. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
  27. Kumar, R. (2025). Bibliometric Analysis: Comprehensive Insights into Tools, Techniques, Applications, and Solutions for Research Excellence. Spectrum of Engineering and Management Sciences, 3(1).
  28. Lehtomaki, A., Huttunen, S., & Rintala, J. A. (2007). Laboratory investigations on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cow manure for methane production:: Effect of crop to manure ratio. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 51(3), 591-609. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.11.004
  29. Lo, K. (2014). A critical review of China's rapidly developing renewable energy and energy efficiency policies. Renewable&Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 508-516. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.09.006
  30. Lo, K. (2015). How authoritarian is the environmental governance of China? Environmental Science&Policy, 54, 152-159. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.001
  31. Lonkila, A., & Kaljonen, M. (2021). Promises of meat and milk alternatives: an integrative literature review on emergent research themes. Agriculture and Human Values, 38, 625-639. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10184-9
  32. LSE (London School of Economies and Political Science). (2025, 10 Temmuz). What is the just transition and what does it mean climate change. https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/explainers/what-is-the-just-transition-and-what-does-it-mean-for-climate-action/.
  33. Mah, A. (2023). The Labour Movement Origins of "Just Transition". https://ourtimes.ca/article/the-labour-movement-origins-of-just-transition (Erişim Tarihi: 01.06.2025).
  34. Mabon, L., & Shih, W. (2018). What might 'just green enough' urban development mean in the context of climate change adaptation? The case of urban greenspace planning in Taipei Metropolis, Taiwan. World Development, 107, 224-238. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.035
  35. Mabon, L., Shackley, S., & Bower-Bir, N. (2014). Perceptions of sub-seabed carbon dioxide storage in Scotland and implications for policy: A qualitative study. Marine Policy, 45, s. 9-15. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2013.11.011
  36. Markanen, S., & Anger-Karaavi, A. (2019). Social impacts of climate change mitigation policies and their implications for inequality. Climate Policy, 19(7), 827-844. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1596873
  37. McCauley, D., Jenkins, K., Heffron, R., Stephan, H., & Rehner, R. (2016). Energy justice: A conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science, 11, 174-182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004
  38. Ming, Q., & Su, M. (2020). Integrating blockchain technology into the energy sector- from theory of blockchain to research and application of energy blockchain. Computer Science Review, 37, 100275.
  39. Newell, P., & Mulvaney, D. (2013). The political economy of the "just transition'. Geographical Journal, 179, s. 132-140. doi:10.1111/geoj.12008
  40. Oei, P., Brauers, H., & Herpich, P. (2019). Lessons from Germany's hard coal mining phase-out: policies and transition from 1950 to 2018. Climate Policy, 20(8), 963-979. doi:10.1080/14693062.2019.1688636
  41. Oei, P., Hermann, H., Herpich, P., Holtemöller, O., Lünenbürger, B., & Schult, C. (2020). Coal phase-out in Germany - Implications and policies for affected regions. Energy, 196, 117004. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.117004
  42. Parag, Y., & Sovacool, B. (2016). Electricity market design for the prosumer era. Nature Energy, 1, s. 1-6. doi:10.1038/NENERGY.2016.32
  43. Passas, I. (2004). Bibliometric Analysis: The Main Steps. Encyclopaedia. 4(2), 1014-1025.
  44. Portakal, C.; Tamcı, I.&Acar, S. (2024). Adil Geçişi Planlamak: Yeşil Dönüşümü Adil Kılmak İçin Bir Çerçeve Önerisi. Ekonomi-tek, 13 (2), 160-182.
  45. Robins, N., & Rydge, J. (2019). Why a just transition is crucial for effective climate action. https://www.unpri.org/download?ac=7092.
  46. Sareen, S., & Haarstad, H. (2018). Bridging socio-technical and justice aspects of sustainable energy transitions. Applied Energy, 228, 624-632. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.104
  47. Sareen, S., & Haarstad, H. (2021). Digitalization as a driver of transformative environmental innovation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 41, 93-95.
  48. Schneider, F., Giger, M., Harari, N., Moser, S.,.., & Tribaldos, T. (2019). Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge and sustainability transformations: Three generic mechanisms of impact generation. Environmental Science & Policy, 102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.017
  49. Sovacool, B. K. (2014). What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Research&Social Science, 1, 1-29. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.003
  50. Sovacool, B. K., Heffron, R. J., McCauley, D., & Goldthau, A. (2016). Energy decisions reframed as justice and ethical concerns. Nature Energy, 1(5), s. 1-6. doi:10.1038/NENERGY.2016.24
  51. Sovacool, B., & Dworkin, M. (2015). Energy justice: Conceptual insights and practical applications. Applied Energy, 142, 435-444. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.002
  52. Sovacool, B., Axen, J., & Sorrell, S. (2018). Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: Towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design. Energy research&Social Science, 45, 12-42. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.007
  53. Stevis, D., & Felli, R. (2015). Global labour unions and just transition to a green economy. International Environmental Agreements-Politics Law and Economics, 15(1), 29-43. doi:10.1007/s10784-014-9266-1
  54. Stevis, D., & Felli, R. (2021). Planetary just transition? How inclusive and how just? Earth System Governance, 6, 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2020.100065
  55. The Just Transition Portal in Belgium. (2024). Just transition. https://www.justtransition.be/en (Erişim Tarihi: 01.06.2025).
  56. Tribaldos, T., & Kontemaki, T. (2022). Just transition principles and criteria for food systems and beyond. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 43, s. 244-256. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.04.005.
  57. Türkoğlu, H. & Keskin, Y.B. (2025). Uluslararası İlişkiler Disiplininde Yenilenebilir Enerji Çalışmaları Üzerine Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25 (2), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1435386
  58. UNFCCC. (2016). Just transition of the work force and the creaton of decent work and quality jobs. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Just%20transition.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 01.06.2025).
  59. Üstün, A.&Cizreli, B. (2022). Yeni bir dönemin eşiğinde adil dönüşüm yaklaşımı. İdealkent, 37 (13), 1913-2133. doi: 10.31198/idealkent.1129903
  60. Wang, X., & Lo, K. (2021). Just transition: A conceptual review. Energy Research&Social Sciences, 82, s. 1-7. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102291.
  61. Castree, N., Adams, W., Barry, J.,., & Newell, P. (2014). Changing the intellectual climate. Nature Climate Change, 4(9), 763-768. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE2339
  62. Ebi, K., Hallegatte, S., Kram, T., Winkler, H.,., & Zwickel, T. (2014). A new scenario framework for climate change research: background, process, and future directions. Climatic Change, 122(3), 363-372. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0912-3
  63. Fazey, I., Schapke, N., Caniglia, G., Hodgson, A., Kendrick, I., Lyon, C.,. Saha, P. (2020). Transforming knowledge systems for life on Earth: Visions of future systems and how to get there. Energy Research & Social Science, 70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101724.
  64. Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F.,.., & Sovacool, B. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Social Transitions, 1-32. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
  65. Schneider, F., Giger, M., Harari, N., Moser, S.,., & Tribaldos, T. (2019). Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge and sustainability transformations: Three generic mechanisms of impact generation. Environmental Science & Policy, 102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.017