KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi / 2024 / Sayı: 87

Blockchain Technology and Social Policy Transformation: A Critical Examination and Recommendations

Nurten Ebru Özdemir(Bitlis Eren University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Social Work)0000-0002-3113-2378
Gökçe Cerev(Kocaeli University, Faculty of Political Sciences, Department of Labor Economics and Industrial Relations)0000-0001-9908-343X
Doğa Başar Sarıipek(Kocaeli University, Faculty of Political Sciences, Department of Labor Economics and Industrial Relations)0000-0002-3525-5199
Salih Tosun(Balıkesir University, İvrindi Health Services Vocational School, Medical Services and Technical Department, Anesthesia Program)0000-0001-6152-2433
Sayfa
15–23
Yayın Tarihi
2024-12-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Ultimately, it enables the simultaneous implementation of a rights-based, needs-driven social policy model, thus paving the way for transformative changes in social welfare systems.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In recent years, Blockchain technology has emerged as a transformative innovation with significant implications on both a global and local scale.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In conclusion, the findings of this study affirm the unique benefits that Blockchain technology offers to the social policy system in Turkey, including increased efficiency, equity, and transparency within social assistance systems.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ultimately, it enables the simultaneous implementation of a rights-based, needs-driven social policy model, thus paving the way for transformative changes in social welfare systems.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Blockchain · Digital transformation · Social Assistance

Abstract

In recent years, Blockchain technology has emerged as a transformative innovation with significant implications on both a global and local scale. Its potential to revolutionise social policy in Turkey is profound and offers avenues for the development of transparent, reliable and participatory systems. As the concept of work evolves, traditional social protection and security systems rooted in conventional employment models must adapt to this changing landscape. In an era prioritising citizenship ties, the importance of financial stability and efficiency has never been greater, necessitating the formulation of precise needs-based social protection policies. Through its ability to enhance the accuracy of identifying individuals in need, the blockchain holds the promise of optimising resource allocation and facilitating the effective implementation of needs-based social policies. This study seeks to delve into the transformative potential of Blockchain technology within social policy systems in Turkey, with a specific focus on social assistance practices, and to provide recommendations for its integration. The significance of this study lies in its exploration of Blockchain’s decentralised digital structure of the blockchain, which ensures data integrity and is pivotal in establishing fair and transparent social assistance mechanisms. By pioneering research in this area, this study aims to bridge existing gaps in the literature and contribute to a deeper understanding of Blockchain’s impact on social assistance in Turkey. Methodologically, the study will start with an exhaustive review of the relevant literature to establish a robust conceptual and theoretical framework. Subsequently, the collected data will undergo descriptive analysis to provide comprehensive interpretation and reporting. In conclusion, the findings of this study affirm the unique benefits that Blockchain technology offers to the social policy system in Turkey, including increased efficiency, equity, and transparency within social assistance systems. By addressing implementation challenges, Blockchain can be tailored to suit the needs of social assistance programs, providing invaluable support to policymakers and decision-makers in shaping future policies. The integration of Blockchain technologies not only facilitates efficient resource allocation but also enables timely and accurate responses to social protection needs. Ultimately, it enables the simultaneous implementation of a rights-based, needs-driven social policy model, thus paving the way for transformative changes in social welfare systems.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Özdemir, N. E., Cerev, G., Sarıipek, D. B., Tosun, S. (2024). Blockchain Technology and Social Policy Transformation: A Critical Examination and Recommendations. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, Sayı: 87, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2024.87.1468729

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (37)

  1. Antonopoulos, A. (2014). Bitcoin security model: trust by computation. www.Forbes.com, February, 20. google scholar
  2. Akıncı, K. Y., ve Kaya, D. G. (2024). Vergilendirme aktörlerinin blockchain teknolojisi tutumları üzerine bir araştırma: Isparta ili örneği. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 15(42), 647-673. google scholar Altunbaşak, T. A. (2018). Blok zincir (Blockchain) teknolojisi ile vergilendirme. Maliye Dergisi, 174, 360-371. google scholar
  3. Atzori, M. (2015) Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: Is the state still necessary? Work Pap google scholar
  4. Borowik, G., Wawrzyniak, Z., & Cichosz, P. (2019). Blockchain technology—innovation and security. Przeglyd Policyjny, 136, 60-78. google scholar
  5. Buterin, V. (2014). A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. Ethereum. google scholar
  6. Catalini, C., & Gans, J. S. (2016). Some simple economics of the blockchain. national bureau of economic research. retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w22952 google scholar
  7. Çatlı, M., ve Keskin, S. (2021). İnsan haklarının değişime açık konusu: dijital vatandaşlık kavramı üzerine bir inceleme. Ombudsman Akademik, 7(14), 199-229. google scholar
  8. Çaybaşı, G., ve Peker, İ. (2024). Blokzincir ve sosyal yardım kavramları üzerine bibliyometrik analiz. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(1), 100-117. google scholar
  9. Deloitte. (2017). Blockchain Technology and its Potential İn Taxes. Deloitte, 1-20. google scholar
  10. Di Pierro, M. (2017). What is the blockchain?. Computing in Science & Engineering, 19(5), 92-95. google scholar
  11. Fan, X. (2021). Charity supervision management system based on blockchain. ın 2021 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Management Technology (ICCSMT) (pp. 554-557). IEEE. google scholar
  12. Gadekallu, T. R., Huynh-The, T., Wang, W., Yenduri, G., Ranaweera, P., Pham, Q. V.,. & Liyanage, M. (2022). Blockchain for the metaverse: A review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.09738. google scholar
  13. Glaser F (2017) Pervasive decentralisation of digital infrastructures: a framework for blockchain enabled system and use case analysis. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2017), Waikoloa Village, Hawaii google scholar
  14. Golosova, J., & Romanovs, A. (2018, November). The advantages and disadvantages of the blockchain technology. In 2018 IEEE 6th workshop on advances in information, electronic and electrical engineering (AIEEE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. google scholar
  15. Gündal, R. P. O. (2024), Blok zincir teknolojisinde kişisel verilerin korunması. Kişisel Verileri Koruma Dergisi, 6(1), 14-27. google scholar
  16. Mendi, A. F. (2021). Blokzincir mimarisi ve getirdiği fırsatlar. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (29), 181-186. google scholar
  17. Miller, M., & Valasek, C. (2016). The Role of Blockchain Technology in Digital Identity Verification. Journal of Cybersecurity. google scholar
  18. Mougayar, W. (2016). The business blockchain: promise, practice, and application of the next Internet technology. John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
  19. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf google scholar
  20. Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Narayanan, V. (2016). Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies: A Comprehensive Introduction. Princeton University Press. google scholar
  21. Nofer, M., Gomber, P., Hinz, O., & Schiereck, D. (2017). Blockchain. Business & information systems engineering, 59, 183-187. google scholar
  22. Owens, J. & Jong, J. (2017). Taxation on the blockchain: opportunities and challenges. Tax Notes, 87 (2017), 117. google scholar
  23. Özpençe, Ö ve Noyan, E. (2022). Ekonomik faaliyetlerin dijitalleşmesi ve metaverse. Bölüm Yazarları, 1. google scholar
  24. Öztürk, M. (2021). Dijital vatandaşlık araştırmalarının incelenmesi: Kavramsal ve yöntemsel eğilimler. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 11(2), 385-393. google scholar
  25. Pineda, M., Jabba, D., & Nieto-Bernal, W. (2024). Blockchain architectures for the digital economy: trends and opportunities. Sustainability, 16(1), 442. google scholar
  26. Sarmah, S. S. (2018). Understanding blockchain technology. Computer Science and Engineering, 8(2), 23-29. google scholar
  27. Rossi, L., & Bianchi, G. (2024). Digital transformations in welfare provision: ımplications for social policy. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 1-6. google scholar
  28. Schou, J., & Hjelholt, M. (2019). Digitaliseringen af den danske offentlige sektor: hvor er vi pâ vej hen?. 0konomi & Politik, 92(2). google scholar
  29. Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain basics: a non-technical ıntroduction in 25 steps. apress. google scholar
  30. Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution: how the technology behind bitcoin ıs changing money, business, and the world. Penguin. google scholar
  31. Tether, B. (2018). The ımpact of blockchain on development and humanitarian efforts. Development Policy Review. google scholar
  32. Türkmen, S. Y., ve Durbilmez, S. E. (2019). Blockchain teknolojisi ve Türkiye finans sektöründeki durumu. Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(1), 30-45. google scholar
  33. Ünal, G., ve Uluyol, Ç. (2020). Blok zinciri teknolojisi. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 13(2), 167-175. google scholar
  34. Zohar, A. (2015). Bitcoin: Under the Hood. Communications of the ACM, 58(9), 104-113. google scholar
  35. Yıldız, Y. (2019). Blok zincir teknolojisi ve vergi denetimi üzerine olası etkileri. Vergi Sorunları Dergisi, 42(366), 55-63. google scholar
  36. Yapıcı, S., Oral, N., Yumuşak, R., ve Eren, T. (2021). Blokzincir teknolojisi ile merkezi ve dağıtık veri tabanının karşılaştırılması. Endüstri Mühendisliği, 32(3), 457-472. google scholar
  37. Gadekallu, T. R., Huynh-The, T., Wang, W., Yenduri, G., Ranaweera, P., Pham, Q. V.,. & Liyanage, M. (2022). Blockchain for the metaverse: A review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.09738. google scholar