KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi / 2024 / Sayı: 87

A Qualitative Study of the Perceptions and Experiences of Volunteers in the Field of Disability: The Case of Bandırma

Fatih Altun(Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Social Work)0000-0001-5464-0909
Mine Ortatepe(Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Social Work)
Sayfa
69–88
Yayın Tarihi
2024-12-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this context, this research contributes to efforts to build a more inclusive and equitable society

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study was to explore the motivations, experiences, and perceptions of individuals involved in volunteering for people with disabilities.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Using a qualitative research method, in-depth interviews were conducted with 12 volunteers involved in activities for people with disabilities in the Bandırma district of Balıkesir province.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this context, this research contributes to efforts to build a more inclusive and equitable society
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Disability · Volunteering · Volunteer Motivation

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the motivations, experiences, and perceptions of individuals involved in volunteering for people with disabilities. This research seeks to contribute to the literature by addressing the intersection of volunteering and disability. The significance of the study lies in revealing the impact of volunteering on both volunteers and people with disabilities and in shedding light on social integration processes. Using a qualitative research method, in-depth interviews were conducted with 12 volunteers involved in activities for people with disabilities in the Bandırma district of Balıkesir province. The findings reveal the diversity of motivations for volunteering, the transformative effect of the volunteering experience, the complex nature of perceptions of disability, and the ongoing change in societal attitudes. In addition, the emotional responses of people with disabilities and suggestions for improving social integration are presented. The results point to the potential of volunteering activities to transform the societal perceptions of people with disabilities and emphasise the need for a multidimensional approach in this field. This study offers practical insights for the design and implementation of volunteering programmes. In this context, this research contributes to efforts to build a more inclusive and equitable society

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Altun, F., Ortatepe, M. (2024). A Qualitative Study of the Perceptions and Experiences of Volunteers in the Field of Disability: The Case of Bandırma. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, Sayı: 87, 69–88. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2024.87.1532116

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (53)

  1. Altun, F., & Demirişler, P. (2023). Kadın Derneklerinde Gönüllü Faaliyetlerde Bulunan Kadınların Gönüllülük Motivasyonları ve Deneyimleri Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Sosyal Çalışma Dergisi, 7(2), 142-166. google scholar
  2. Ardahan, F. (2016). Ciddi boş zaman faaliyeti olarak gönüllülük: AKUT örneği. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1), 47-61. google scholar
  3. Aslan, H., & Tuncay, T. (2024). Çocuk Refahı Alanında Gönüllü Faaliyetlere Katılım Sağlayan Bireylerin Gönüllülüğe Bakışlarının İncelenmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 44(1), 283-311. google scholar
  4. Balaban, A. Y., & İnce, İ. Ç. (2015). Gençlerin sivil toplum kuruluşlarındaki gönüllülük faaliyetleri ve gönüllülük algısı: Türkiye Eğitim Gönüllüleri Vakfı (TEGV) Örneği. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(2), 149-169. google scholar
  5. Bampi, L. N., Guilhem, D., & Alves, E. D. (2010). Social model: a new approach of the disability theme. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem(18), 816-823. google scholar
  6. Bektaş, S. (2021). Spor Etkinliklerinde Gönüllülük. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. google scholar
  7. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality. New York: Penguin Books. google scholar
  8. Bocs, V., Fenyes, H., & Markos, V. (2017). Motives of volunteering and values of work among higher education students. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 16(2), 117-131. google scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. J. Richardson içinde, Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (s. 241-258). Westport, CT: Greenwood. google scholar
  10. Burns, D. J., Reid, J. S., Toncar, M., Fawcett, J., & Anderson, C. (2006). Motivations to volunteer: The role of altruism. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 3, 79-91. google scholar
  11. Bussell, H., & Forbes, D. (2002). Understanding the volunteer market: The what, where, who and why of volunteering. International journal of nonprofit and voluntary sector marketing, 7(3), 244-257. google scholar
  12. Clary, E. G., & Snyder, M. (1999). The motivations to volunteer: Theoretical and practical considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science(8), 156-159. google scholar
  13. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human Nature and The Social Order. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. google scholar
  14. Çakı, F. (2014). Türk sosyolojinde yeni bir alan: Gönüllülük araştırmaları. Sosyoloji Dergisi, 3(29), 185-202. google scholar
  15. Çevik, A., & Gürsel, F. (2015). Gönüllü motivasyon envanteri: Türk popülâsyonuna uyarlanması. SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(2), 83-92. google scholar
  16. Diğer, H. (2018). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Engellilik Algı Düzeyinin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma: Fırat Üniversitesi Örneği. Elazığ: Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. google scholar
  17. Diğer, H., & Yıldız, A. (2021). Engelli Bireylere Yönelik Toplumsal Algı: Fırat Üniversitesi Örneği. Fırat Üniversitesi Harput Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(15), 67-84. google scholar
  18. Durkheim, E. (1984). The division of labour in society. (W. D. Halls, Çev.) USA: The Macmillan Press. google scholar
  19. Giddens, A. (1986). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press. google scholar
  20. Giorgi, A. (1997). The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28(2), 235-260. google scholar
  21. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. google scholar
  22. Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597-607. google scholar
  23. uest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903 google scholar
  24. Gülmez, M. (2019). Üniversite öğrencilerinin gönüllülük davranışları ve motivasyonları üzerine bir araştırma: Çağ Üniversitesi örneği. Gençlik Araştırmaları Dergisi(7. (Özel Sayı)), 125-154. google scholar
  25. Güngör, F., & Çölgeçen, Y. (2013). STK’larda gönüllü yönetimi ve motivasyonun performansa etkisi. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 8(3), 163-187. google scholar
  26. Haski-Leventhal, D. (2009). Altruism and volunteerism: The perceptions of altruism in four disciplines and their impact on the study of volunteerism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 39(3), 271-299. google scholar
  27. Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: The Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press. google scholar
  28. Kesgin, B. (2016). Türkiye’de gönüllülük çalışmaları üzerine bir değerlendirme. MSGSÜ Sosyal Bilimler, 13, 119-131. google scholar
  29. Kleiman, S. (2004). Phenomenology: To wonder and search for meanings. Nurse researcher, 11(4), 7-19. google scholar
  30. Kulik, L. (2018). Through Adversity Comes Strength: Volunteering and Self-Esteem Among People with Physical Disabilities. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29, 174-189. google scholar
  31. Kümbetoğlu, B. (2020). Niteliksel Araştırmalarda Analiz. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayıncılık. google scholar
  32. Markova, A. (2018). The “inclusive volunteering” phenomenon: Research into the volunteering of people with disabilities. Kontakt, 20(1), e48-e56. google scholar
  33. Martinkova, I., & Parry, J. (2012). An Introduction to the Phenomenological Study of Sport. UK: Routledge. google scholar
  34. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review (50), 370-396. google scholar
  35. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press. google scholar
  36. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. google scholar
  37. Muştu, A. (2019). Sivil toplum kuruluşlarında gönüllü motivasyonu: Genç Kızılay örneği. İstanbul: Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi. google scholar
  38. Palabiyik, H. (2011). Gönüllülük ve Yerel Hizmetlere Gönüllü Katilim Üzerine Açiklamalar. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 85-114. google scholar
  39. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed. b.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. google scholar
  40. Putnam, R. D. (1994). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditionsin Modern Italy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. google scholar
  41. Sadıkoğlu, Z. Z. (2024). Türkiye’de Sivil Toplumda Gönüllülük ve Psikolojik Sözleşme. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 86, 72-85. google scholar
  42. Stryker, S. (2008). From Mead to a Structural Symbolic Interactionism and Beyond. The Annual Review of Sociology(34), 15-31. google scholar
  43. Swingewood, A. (1998). Sosyolojik düşüncenin kısa tarihi (1. b.). (O. Akınhay, Çev.) Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları. google scholar
  44. Thomas, C. (2004). How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches. Disability & Society, 19(6), 569-583. google scholar
  45. United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 04 17, 2024 tarihinde https://www.un.org/development/desa/ disabilities/convention- on- the- rights- of- persons- with- Disabilities.html adresinden alındı google scholar
  46. Üngör, İ. (2019). Türkiye’de Engellilik Algısına Sosyolojik Bir Bakış. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi Orta Doğu ve İslam Ülkleri Araştırmaları Enstitüsü. google scholar
  47. WHO. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: WHO. google scholar
  48. Wicki, M. T., & Meier, S. (2016). Supporting Volunteering Activities by Adults With Intellectual Disabilities: An Explorative Qualitative Study. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 13(4), 320-326. google scholar
  49. Williams, M., & Moser, T. (2019). The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International Management Review, 15(1), 45-55. google scholar
  50. Yanay-Ventura, G. (2019). Nothing About Us Without Us” in Volunteerism Too:Volunteering Among People with Disabilities. International Society for Third-Sector Research, 30, 147-163. google scholar
  51. Bussell, H., & Forbes, D. (2002). Understanding the volunteer market: The what, where, who and why of volunteering. International journal of nonprofit and voluntary sector marketing, 7(3), 244-257. google scholar
  52. Güngör, F., & Çölgeçen, Y. (2013). STK’larda gönüllü yönetimi ve motivasyonun performansa etkisi. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 8(3), 163-187. google scholar
  53. WHO. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: WHO. google scholar