KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 88

An Approach to Care Models for Disabled Children in Need of Protection in Selected Countries

Burak Küsmez(Yalova University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Social Work)0000-0001-8914-5801
Abdullah Selim Doğan(Yalova University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Labor Economics and Industrial Relations)0000-0003-3844-3280
Sayfa
38–57
Yayın Tarihi
2025-07-25
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this study, the child protection systems of countries representing various welfare models will be examined, and the practices for disabled children in need of protection in these systems will be comparatively evaluated and discussed.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Children in need of protection have been the subject of various services over the years as subjects for whom the states feel responsible.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Governments have primarily focused on providing remedial services to children in need of protection and have assumed less responsibility for protection and prevention.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this study, the child protection systems of countries representing various welfare models will be examined, and the practices for disabled children in need of protection in these systems will be comparatively evaluated and discussed.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Child in need of protection · Care models · Disability

Abstract

Children in need of protection have been the subject of various services over the years as subjects for whom the states feel responsible. Governments have primarily focused on providing remedial services to children in need of protection and have assumed less responsibility for protection and prevention. As a result of this situation, uniform care models have existed in various countries for years. Still, the fact that children are not uniform has revealed that care models should not be uniform either. As a result, multiple transformations have occurred. These transfor mations were aimed at increasing the wellbeing of children in need of protection and occurred in parallel with the welfare models of the states. Children in need of protection experience multiple socioeconomic disadvantages. Children who have lost their parents or who are not cared for by their parents may face many disadvantages that accompany this disadvantage. When these children also have a disability, the compounded effects of vulnerability and exclusion intensify, and life can become much more difficult for them. In this study, the child protection systems of countries representing various welfare models will be examined, and the practices for disabled children in need of protection in these systems will be comparatively evaluated and discussed.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Küsmez, B., Doğan, A. S. (2025). An Approach to Care Models for Disabled Children in Need of Protection in Selected Countries. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, Sayı: 88, 38–57. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2025.88.1618261

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (94)

  1. AFCARS. (2021). Data and statistics: AFCARS. Access address: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/ afcars google scholar
  2. Aile, Çalışma ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı. (2019). 2019 yılı faaliyet raporu. Access address: https://ailevecalisma.gov.tr/media/49934/ acshb_2019_yili_faaliyet_raporu.pdf google scholar
  3. Aile ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı. (2022). 2021 yılı faaliyet raporu. Access address: https://www.aile.gov.tr/media/100242/2021-yili-faaliyet-raporu.pdf google scholar
  4. Ângman, I., & Gustafsson, M. (2011). Combating child abuse and neglect in Sweden. Regionförbundet Örebro. google scholar
  5. Attepe Özden, S. (2020). Engellilik ile ilgili modeller. M. Tekindal ve S. Attepe Özden (Ed.). Engellilik alanında sosyal hizmet kuram ve uygulamaları içinde (s.33-41). Nobel Yayınları. google scholar
  6. Bae H. & Kindler, H. (2017). Child maltreatment re-notifications in Germany: Analysis of local case files. Children and Youth Services Review, 75, 42-49. google scholar
  7. Bakıma Muhtaç Engellilerin Tespiti ve Bakım Hizmeti Esaslarının Belirlenmesine İlişkin Yönetmelik. (2010). Resmi Gazete (No: 26679). Access address: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2007/10/20071023-10.htm google scholar
  8. Brooks, B. (2016). Black single mothers and the child welfare system. Routledge. google scholar
  9. Berrick, J. D., & Chambers, J. (2020). Preventing and responding to errors in US child protection. K. Biesel vd. (Ed.). Errors and mistakes in child protection içinde (p.235-254). Policy Press Scholarship. google scholar
  10. Berrick, J. D. (2011). Trends and issues in the US child welfare system. N. Gilbert, N. Parton ve M. Skivenes (Ed.). Child protection systems international trends and orientations içinde (p. 17-36). University of Maryland. google scholar
  11. Berggren, J. U., Arnesson, K., & Bergman, A. S. (2021). The take-off for private consultants in child protection ınvestigations—how did Sweden get here?. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(4), 1463-1481. google scholar
  12. Bressem, K., Ziegenhain, U., Doelitzsch, C., Hofer, A., Besier, T., Fegert, J. M., & Kuenster, A. K. (2016). A German e-learning-training in the context of early preventive intervention and child protection: Preliminary findings of a pre-post evaluation. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 10, 1-9. google scholar
  13. Bruhn, C. M. (2004). Children with disabilities: Abuse, neglect, and the child welfare system. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 8(1-2), 173-203. google scholar
  14. Camargo, K. D. O. (2011). Systems of çare: transition from the bio-psycho-social perspective of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Child: care, health and development, 37(6), 792-799. google scholar
  15. Cocozza, M., Gustafsson, P. A., & Sydsjö, G. (2006). Child protection in Sweden: Are routine assessments reliable? Acta paediatrica, 95(11), 1474-1480. google scholar
  16. Collier, J. (2022). Comparison of Disability Welfare Between Japan and Sweden. Access address: https://www.pp.u-tokyo.ac.jp/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Final_Paper_Disability_Welfare_-_Jacqueline_Collier.pdf google scholar
  17. Conrad, A., Gamboni, C., Johnson, V., Wojciak, A. S., & Ronnenberg, M. (2020). Has the US child welfare system become an informal income maintenance programme? A literature review. Child Abuse Review, 29(2), 529-543. google scholar
  18. Crosse, S. vd. (1992). A report on the maltreatment of children with disabilities. Westat, Inc. google scholar
  19. Çelik, R. (2020). Hamidiye etfal hastahanesi, darülhayr ve darüleytam. R. Çelik (Ed.). Sosyal hizmet tarihi (pp. 297-328). Grafiker Yayınları. google scholar
  20. Çocuk Koruma Hizmetleri Planlama ve Çocuk Bakım Kuruluşlarının Çalışma Usul ve Esasları Hakkında Yönetmelik. (2022, 6 September). Resmi Gazete (No: 31945). Access address: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=39704&MevzuatTur=7& MevzuatTertip=5 google scholar
  21. Çocuk Koruma Kanunu. (2005, 3 Temmuz). Resmi Gazete (No: 5395). Erişim adresi: http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2005/07/ 20050715-1.html google scholar
  22. Çocuk Koruma Kanununa Göre Verilen Koruyucu ve Destekleyici Tedbir Kararlarının Uygulanması Hakkında Yönetmelik. (2006, 24 December). Resmi Gazete (No: 26386). Access address: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=10884&MevzuatTur=7& MevzuatTertip=5 google scholar
  23. Disability Statistics & Demographics Center. (2021). Annual report on people with disabilities in America. Access address: https://dis abilitycompendium.org/sites/default/files/user-uploads/Events/2022ReleaseYear/Annual%20Report%20---%202021%20---%20 WEB.pdf google scholar
  24. Ehrich, J., Grote, U., Gerber-Grote, A., & Strassburg, M. (2016). The child health care system of Germany. The Journal of Pediatrics, 177, 71-86. google scholar
  25. Engwall, K., Östberg, F., Andersson, G., Bons, T., & Bringlöv, Â. (2019). Children with disabilities in Swedish child welfare-a differentiating and disabling practice. European Journal of Social Work, 22(6), 1025-1037. google scholar
  26. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three world of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press. google scholar
  27. Fendrich, S. ve Tabel, A. (2012). Consolidation or breathing pause? Recent trends regarding child welfare services. Komdat, 15(3), 11-13. google scholar
  28. Forkby, T., Höjer, S., & Liljegren, A. (2015). Questions of control in child protection decision making: Laypersons’ monitoring and governance in child protection committees in Sweden. Journal of Social Work, 15(5), 537-557. google scholar
  29. Föltz, F. (2017). Creating normalcy: Microstudies on the situation of foster mother and fathers in dealing with the special needs of children and youth with disabilities (Doktora Tezi). Otto-von-Guericke-Universitat Magdeburg. google scholar
  30. Föltz, F. (2020). Creating normalcy: Foster care for children and youth with disabilities and medical fragility in Germany. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 11(4.1), 132-151. google scholar
  31. German Federal Statistical Office. (2022). Social statistics. Access address: https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Society-Environment/ Social-Statistics/_node.html google scholar
  32. Gilbert, N., Parton, N., & Skivenes, M. (Eds.). (2011). Child protection systems: International trends and emerging orientations. Oxford University Press. google scholar
  33. Gökçearslan-Çifçi, E. (2009). Türkiye'de ve dünyada korunmaya ihtiyacı olan çocuklara yönelik hizmetlerin tarihsel gelişimi. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 19(19), 53-66. google scholar
  34. Gries, S. (2002). Kindesmisshandlung in der DDR. Kinder unter dem Einflufi traditionell-autoritarer und totalitarer Erziehungsleitbilder. Lit Verlag. google scholar
  35. Gümüscü, A., Nygren, L., & Khoo, E. (2015). Bringing the family back in: On role assignment and clientification in the Swedish social services. Social Sciences, 4(1), 117-133. google scholar
  36. Harder, A. T., Zeller, M., Lopez, M., Köngeter, S., & Knorth, E. J. (2013). Different sizes, similar challenges: Out-of-home çare for youth in Germany and the Netherlands. Psychosocial Intervention, 22(3), 203-213. google scholar
  37. Heimer, M., & Palme, J. (2016). Rethinking child policy post-UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: Vulnerable children's welfare in Sweden. Journal of Social Policy, 45(3), 435-452. google scholar
  38. Höjer, S., & Forkby, T. (2011). Care for sale: The influence of new public management in child protection in Sweden. British Journal of Social Work, 41(1), 93-110. google scholar
  39. Höjer, S., Hultman, E., & Larsson, M. (2022). What do actors in child protection processes in Sweden know about children’s rights to participation and about talking to children?. Nordic Social Work Research, 1-14. google scholar
  40. İzci, L. Uğurlu, H., Çöllü, İ., & Demir, G. (2018). Korunmaya muhtaç çocukların mekan değişikliği: Koğuşlardan evlere. Journal of Institute of Economic Development and Social Researches, 4(9), 228-237. google scholar
  41. Jonson-Reid, M., Drake, B., Kim, J., Porterfield, S., & Han, L. (2004). A prospective analysis of the relationship between reported child maltreatment and special education eligibility among poor children. Child maltreatment, 9(4), 382-394. google scholar
  42. Jernbro, C. ve Janson, S. (2017). Violence against children in Sweden 2016. The Children’s Welfare Foundation, Sweden Stockholm. google scholar
  43. Kindler, H. ve Borrmann, S. (2013). Prominent facets of child protection in Germany. J. Hamalainen, B. Littlechild, O. Chytil, M. Sramata, E. Jovelin (Ed.). Evolotion of child protection and child welfare policies in selected European countries içinde (p. 161-181). ERIS with Albert Publications. google scholar
  44. Kindler, H., Lillig, S., Blüml, H., Meysen, T., & Werner, A. (2006). Handbuch Kindeswohlgefahrdung nach § 1666 BGB und Allgemeiner Sozialer Dienst (ASD). DJI. google scholar
  45. Kindler, H. (2008). Developing evidence-based child protection practice: A view from Germany. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(4), 319-324. google scholar
  46. Koivula, T., Ellonen, N., Janson, S., Jernbro, C., Huhtala, H., & Paavilainen, E. (2018). Psychological and physical violence towards children with disabilities in Finland and Sweden. Journal of Child Health Care, 22(3), 317-331. google scholar
  47. Koruyucu Aile Yönetmeliği. (2012, 14 Aralık). Resmi Gazete (Sayı: 28947). Access address: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat? MevzuatNo=16840&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5 google scholar
  48. Küsmez, B. (2020). Korunma ihtiyacı olan çocuklar için kurumsal ve alternatif hizmet modelleri: Bir değerlendirme. International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences, 4(3), 201-225. google scholar
  49. Leviner, P. (2014). Child protection under Swedish law—legal duality and uncertainty. European Journal of Social Work, 17(2), 206-220. google scholar
  50. Leviner, P. (2018). Child participation in the Swedish child protection system: Child-friendly focus but limited child influence on outcomes. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 26(1), 136-158. google scholar
  51. Lightfoot, E. (2014). Children and youth with disabilities in the child welfare system. Child Welfare, 93(2), 23-46. google scholar
  52. Lightfoot, E., Hill, K., & LaLiberte, T. (2011). Prevalence of children with disabilities in the child welfare system and out of home placement: An examination of administrative records. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(11), 2069-2075. google scholar
  53. Liljegren, A., Höjer, S., & Forkby, T. (2014). Laypersons, professions, and governance in the welfare state: The Swedish child protection system. Journal of Professions and Organization, 1(2), 161-175. google scholar
  54. Liljegren, A., Höjer, S., & Forkby, T. (2018). 'I do not want to teli you how to do your job, but.'-laypersons challenging the authority of professionals in Swedish child protection. Nordic Social Work Research, 8(1), 50-63. google scholar
  55. Linden-Boström, M. ve Persson, G. (2014). Protective factorfor mentol health between adolescent with without disabilities. Trio Trych AB. google scholar
  56. Lindqvist, R., & Lamichhane, K. (2019). Disability policies in Japan and Sweden: A comparative perspective. Alter, 13(1), 1-14. google scholar
  57. Lundström, T. (2001). Child protection, voluntary organizations, and the public sector in Sweden. Voluntos: Internotionol Journol of Voluntory ond Nonprofit Orgonizotions, 12, 355-371. google scholar
  58. Meagher, G., Lundström, T., Sallnas, M., & Wiklund, S. (2016). Big Business in a thin market: Understanding the privatization of residential car for children and youth in Sweden. Sociol Policy&Administrotion, 50(7), 805-823. google scholar
  59. Mitchell, L. B., Barth, R. P., Green, R., Wall, A., Biemer, P., Berrick, J. D., & Webb, M. B. (2005). Child welfare reform in the United States: Findings from a local agency survey. Child Welfore, 84(1), 5-24. google scholar
  60. Murray, K. O. ve Gesiriech, S. (2004). A brief legislative history of the child welfare system. Reseorch Poper, the Pew Commission on Children in Foster Core. google scholar
  61. Myers, J. E. B. (2008). A short history of child protection in America. Fomily Low Quorterly, 42(3), 449-463. google scholar
  62. Negiz, Z. (2020). Islahhaneler, sanayi mektepleri ve Darüşşafaka. R. Çelik (Ed.). Sosyol hizmet torihi (pp. 267-284). Grafiker Yayınları. google scholar
  63. Olsson, M. B. ve Hwang, P. C. (2003). Influence of macrostructure of Society on the life situation of families with a child with intellectual disability: Sweden as an example. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47(4-5), 328-341. google scholar
  64. Olsson, L. M., Bengtsson, S., Granlund, M., Huus, K., Andersson, E. E., & Kâreholt, I. (2020). Social service utilization in relation to class setting-a longitudinal study among children with mild intellectual disability in Sweden. European journal of special needs education, 35(4), 544-558. google scholar
  65. Özel Kreş ve Gündüz Bakımevleri ile Özel Çocuk Kulüplerinin Kuruluş ve İşleyiş Esasları Hakkında Yönetmelik. (2015, 30 April). Resmi Gazete. Access address: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=20718&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5 google scholar
  66. Özkaya, N. ve Kaya, M. (2020). Darülaceze. R. Çelik (Ed.). Sosyal hizmet tarihi (pp. 285-296). Grafiker Yayınları. google scholar
  67. Pecora, P. J., Whittaker, J. K., Barth, R. P., Borja, S., & Vesneski, W. (2010). The child welfare challenge. Aldine Transaction. google scholar
  68. Pfahl, L. ve Powell, J. W. (2011). Legitimating school segregation. The special education profession and the discourse of learning disability in Germany. Disability & Society, 26(4), 449-462. google scholar
  69. Porko, P., vd. (2018). Inquiry on private child welfare units. Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. google scholar
  70. Reich, J. A. (2005). Fixing families parents, power and the child welfare system. Routledge. google scholar
  71. Roos, G. (1996). Disabled foster children. U. Gintzel (Ed.). Upbringing in foster families: Looking for a future içinde (pp. 197-200). Votum. google scholar
  72. Sallnas, M., & Wiklund, S. (2011). Private service providers in welfare services. Socionomen, 8(i), 22-7. google scholar
  73. Sann, A. ve Schafer, R. (2011). Frühe Hilfen in Deuschland: Angebote und Perspektiven. Jugendhilfe, 49(2), 79-94. google scholar
  74. Schröder, C. ve Zöller, U. (2020). Organizing transregional child protection within the greater region of France, Germany, Belgium and Luxembourg. Social Work & Society 18(3), 1-17. google scholar
  75. Shanks, E., Backe-Hansen, E., Eriksson, P., Lausten, M., Lundström, T., Ranta, H., & Sallnas, M. (2021). Privatization of residential çare for children and youth in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Nordic Welfare Research, 6(3), 128-141. google scholar
  76. Shannon, P. ve Agorastou, M. (2006). Identifying children with developmental disabilities receiving child protection services: A national survey of child welfare administrators. Families in Society, 87(3), 351-357. google scholar
  77. Slayter, E. (2016). Youth with disabilities in the United States child welfare system. Children and Youth Services Review, 64, 155-165. google scholar
  78. Slayter E. ve Springer, C. (2011). Child welfare-involved youth with intellectual disabilities: Pathways into and placements in foster care. İntellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 49(1), 1-13. google scholar
  79. Sosyal ve Ekonomik Destek Hizmetleri Hakkında Yönetmelik. (2015, 3 March). Resmi Gazete (No: 29284). Access address: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=20570&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5 google scholar
  80. Statista. (2023). Number of people receiving LSS disability service in Sweden, 2022. Access address: https://www.statista.com/statistics/ 530601/sweden-disability-by-type/ google scholar
  81. Sullivan, P. ve Knutson, J. (2000). Maltreatment and disabilities: A population-based epidemiological study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(100), 1257-1273. google scholar
  82. Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare (2019). Statistik om socialtjanstinsatser till barn och unga 2018. Socialstyrelsen. google scholar
  83. Şeker, K. (2020). Himaye-i etfal cemiyeti, çocuk esirgeme kurumu (1917-1981). R. Çelik (Ed.). Sosyal hizmet tarihi içinde (pp. 329-368). Grafiker Yayınları. google scholar
  84. Şirin, M. C. (2017). Fransa ve Türkiye’de Korunması Gereken Çocuk ve Çocuk Koruma İdaresinin Tarihsel Gelişimi. Çocuk ve Medeniyet, 2(3), 43-69. google scholar
  85. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2020). İstatistiklerle Çocuk, 2020. Access address: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Istatistiklerle-Cocuk-2020-37228 google scholar
  86. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2013). Nüfus ve Konut Araştırması, 2011. Erişim adresi: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Nufus-ve-Konut-Arastirmasi-2011-15843 google scholar
  87. Vig, S. ve Kaminer, R. (2002). Maltreatment and developmental disabilities in children. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 14, 371-386. google scholar
  88. Vonneilich, N., Lüdecke, D., & Kofahl, C. (2016). The impact of care on family and health-related quality of life of parents with chronically ill and disabled children. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38(8), 761-767. google scholar
  89. Witte, S., Miehlbradt, L., van Santen, E., & Kindler, H. (2016). Briefing on the German Child protection system. Access address: http:// www. projecthestia. com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/POLICY-BRIEFINGGERMANY. pdf. google scholar
  90. Witte, S., Miehlbradt, L. S., van Santen, E., & Kindler, H. (2019). Preventing child endangerment: Child protection in Germany. L. Merkel-Holguin vd. (Ed.). National system of child protection. Understanding the international variability and context for developing policy and practice (pp. 93-114). Springer. google scholar
  91. Wolf, K. (2012). Promoting the positive development of foster children: Establishing research in Germany. Adoption & Fostering, 36(1), 40-51. google scholar
  92. Wolff, R., Biesel, K., & Heinitz, S. (2011). Child protection in an age of uncertainty: Germany’s response. N. Gilbert, N. Parton ve M. Skivenes (Ed.). Child protection systems international trends and orientations içinde (p. 183-204). University of Maryland. google scholar
  93. World Health Organization. (2022). Disability. Access address: https://www.who.int/health-topics/disability#tab=tab_1 google scholar
  94. Liljegren, A., Höjer, S., & Forkby, T. (2018). 'I do not want to teli you how to do your job, but.'-laypersons challenging the authority of professionals in Swedish child protection. Nordic Social Work Research, 8(1), 50-63. google scholar