Dergiler / İnsan ve Toplum / 2023 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 4

How the Demos [Public] Regulate the Kratos [Administration] Through Repeated Elections: Lessons Learned from the Elections in Türkiye for the Government and Opposition

Ahmet Keser(HASAN KALYONCU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1064-7807
Burak Kılıç(HASAN KALYONCU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9147-0144
Cuma Ali Özbek(HASAN KALYONCU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0587-3751
Sayfa
66–93
Yayın Tarihi
2023-12-18
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Lessons exist for the government and opposition parties to learn from these annulled and repeated elections, with repeated elections generally resulting in an unfavorable outcome for the contesting party.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objections to the results of conducted elections and repeated elections are a significant issue.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:According to the results of the content analysis, the study found within the frame of the investigated period the SEC to have annulled a total of five elections, four of which had been local and one that had been a parliamentary election, and the most frequent reason for repeating the elections to have been due to restricted or ineligible voters voting, which occurred for four separate elections.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Lessons exist for the government and opposition parties to learn from these annulled and repeated elections, with repeated elections generally resulting in an unfavorable outcome for the contesting party.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Elections · Supreme Election Council · annulled elections

Özet

Objections to the results of conducted elections and repeated elections are a significant issue. The aim of this study is to investigate repeated elections and the reasons for canceling them through the decisions of Türkiye’s Supreme Election Council (SEC) since its establishment and to examine the results of repeated elections to reveal which side benefits from this. According to the results of the content analysis, the study found within the frame of the investigated period the SEC to have annulled a total of five elections, four of which had been local and one that had been a parliamentary election, and the most frequent reason for repeating the elections to have been due to restricted or ineligible voters voting, which occurred for four separate elections. Lessons exist for the government and opposition parties to learn from these annulled and repeated elections, with repeated elections generally resulting in an unfavorable outcome for the contesting party.

Abstract

Objections to the results of conducted elections and repeated elections are a significant issue. The aim of this study is to investigate repeated elections and the reasons for canceling them through the decisions of Türkiye’s Supreme Election Council (SEC) since its establishment and to examine the results of repeated elections to reveal which side benefits from this. According to the results of the content analysis, the study found within the frame of the investigated period the SEC to have annulled a total of five elections, four of which had been local and one that had been a parliamentary election, and the most frequent reason for repeating the elections to have been due to restricted or ineligible voters voting, which occurred for four separate elections. Lessons exist for the government and opposition parties to learn from these annulled and repeated elections, with repeated elections generally resulting in an unfavorable outcome for the contesting party.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Keser, A., Özbek, C. A. (2023). How the Demos [Public] Regulate the Kratos [Administration] Through Repeated Elections: Lessons Learned from the Elections in Türkiye for the Government and Opposition. İnsan ve Toplum, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 4, 66–93. https://doi.org/10.12658/M0704

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. Özbudun, E. (1995). Seçim sistemleri ve Türkiye [Election systems and Turkey]. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 44(1-4), 521–539.
  2. Özkan, M. (2020). “Demokrasi ve temsil: Paradoksu Rousseau üzerinden okumak. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, 29(2), 403-430. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2020.29.2.0030
  3. Republic of Türkiye 1961 Constitution. (1961). Chapter Cumhuriyetin temel kuruluşu [The Fundamentals of the Republic]. Retrieved from: https://www.anayasa.gen.tr/1961ay.htm