Dergiler / International Journal of Thermodynamics / 2023 / Cilt: 26 Sayı: 4

Comparative Evaluation for Selected Gas Turbine Cycles

Sayfa
57–67
Yayın Tarihi
2023-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The POGT cycle has a better energy and exergy performance at a lower pressure ratio than the SGT and GT-ABC.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The energy and exergy evaluation of simple gas turbine (SGT), gas turbine with air bottoming cycle (GT-ABC), and partial oxidation gas turbine (POGT) are studied.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The characteristics performance for selected cycles are discussed and verified with that obtained for available practical cycles (SGT, GT-ABC, POGT).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The POGT cycle has a better energy and exergy performance at a lower pressure ratio than the SGT and GT-ABC.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Gas turbine · Thermal analysis · Energy efficiency

Abstract

The energy and exergy evaluation of simple gas turbine (SGT), gas turbine with air bottoming cycle (GT-ABC), and partial oxidation gas turbine (POGT) are studied. The governing equations for each cycle are solved using energy equation Solver (EES) software. The characteristics performance for selected cycles are discussed and verified with that obtained for available practical cycles (SGT, GT-ABC, POGT). The present results show a good agreement with the practical one. The effects of significant operational parameters, turbine inlet temperature (TIT), compression ratio (CR), and compressor inlet temperature (CIT), on the specific fuel consumption, energy and exergy efficiencies are discussed. According to the findings, a reduction in CIT and a rise in TIT and CR led to enhance energy and exergy efficiency for each configuration with different ranges. Results revealed that the GT-ABC and POGT cycles are more efficient than those of SGT at the same operational parameters. The energy and exergy efficiencies are 38.4%, 36.2% for SGT, 40%, 37.8 % for GT-ABC, and 41.6%, 39.3% for POGT. The POGT cycle has a better energy and exergy performance at a lower pressure ratio than the SGT and GT-ABC.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ELWARDANY, M., NASSİB, A. E. M., MOHAMED, H. A. (2023). Comparative Evaluation for Selected Gas Turbine Cycles. International Journal of Thermodynamics, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 4, 57–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/1020309

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. J. A. M. da Silva, S. Ávila Filho, and M. Carvalho, “Assessment of energy and exergy efficiencies in steam generators,” Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 3217–3226, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s40430-016-0704-6.
  2. M. N. Ibrahim, T. K., Mohammed, M. K., Awad, O. I., Abdalla, A. N., Basrawi, F., Mohammed, “A comprehensive review on the exergy analysis of combined cycle power plants,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 90, no. April, pp. 835–850, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.072. A. G. Memon, R. A. Memon, K. Harijan, and M. A. Uqaili, “Thermo-environmental analysis of an open cycle gas turbine power plant with regression modeling and optimization,” Journal of the Energy Institute, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 81–88, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.joei.2014.03.023. Ş. Balku, “Analysis of combined cycle efficiency by simulation and optimization,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 148, pp. 174–183, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.05.032. O. J. Khaleel, F. Basim Ismail, T. Khalil Ibrahim, and S. H. bin Abu Hassan, “Energy and exergy analysis of the steam power plants: A comprehensive review on the Classification, Development, Improvements, and configurations,” Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 101640, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2021.11.009. D. M. Mitrović, B. V. Stojanović, J. N. Janevski, M. G. Ignjatović, and G. D. Vučković, “Exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a steam boiler,” Thermal Science, vol. 22, pp. S1601–S1612, 2018, doi: 10.2298/TSCI18S5601M. G. R. Ahmadi and D. Toghraie, “Energy and exergy analysis of Montazeri Steam Power Plant in Iran,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 56, pp. 454–463, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.074. O. K. Singh, “Assessment of thermodynamic irreversibility in different zones of a heavy fuel oil fired high pressure boiler,” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 829–840, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10973-015-4959-4.
  3. M. Hajizadeh aghdam, M. H. Khoshgoftar manesh, N. Khani, and M. Yazdi, “Energy, Exergy-Based and Emergy-Based Analysis of Integrated Solar PTC with a Combined Cycle Power Plant,” International Journal of Thermodynamics, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 17–30, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.5541/ijot.902374. S. Zandi, K. G. Mofrad, A. Moradifaraj, and G. R. Salehi, “Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analyses and multi-objective optimization of a CPC driven solar combined cooling and power cycle with diffe