Dergiler / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2023 / Cilt: 29 Sayı: 4

Effect of Adding Lactic Acid Bacteria to Maize Silage on Nutritive Guality, Fermentation Properties and in Vitro Digestibility

Sayfa
1050–1058
Yayın Tarihi
2023-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

When all parameters were examined, it was concluded that the addition of PFJ, which is prepared by adding 5% fructose to the meadow grass plant, to the maize silage has positive effects on IVOMD, ME, CH4, LA and yeast-mold and can be used instead of commercial inoculants.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aimed to determine the effects of adding lactic acid bacteria to maize silage on the nutritional quality, fermentation properties, and its in vitro organic matter digestion (IVOMD).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Pre-fermented juices (PFJ) prepared from different water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) sources at the rate of 5% and commercial homofermentative and heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were added to silages.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:When all parameters were examined, it was concluded that the addition of PFJ, which is prepared by adding 5% fructose to the meadow grass plant, to the maize silage has positive effects on IVOMD, ME, CH4, LA and yeast-mold and can be used instead of commercial inoculants.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Epiphytic microorganisms · inoculant · In vitro digestibility

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effects of adding lactic acid bacteria to maize silage on the nutritional quality, fermentation properties, and its in vitro organic matter digestion (IVOMD). Pre-fermented juices (PFJ) prepared from different water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) sources at the rate of 5% and commercial homofermentative and heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were added to silages. Groups were designed as (I) control, (II) Glucose-PFJ, (III) Fructose-PFJ, (IV) Sucrose-PFJ, (V) Molasses-PFJ, (VI) Homofermentative LAB (HoLAB) and (VII) Heterofermentative LAB (HetLAB). Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) count, lactic acid (LA), acetic acid (AA), LA/AA ratio, pH and yeast values of the natural fermented lactic acid bacteria liquids prepared by adding 5% of different easily soluble carbohydrate sources to meadow grass showed significant variations. The differences among the groups in the crude ash (CA), acid detergent fiber (ADF), IVOMD and methane (CH4) values of the silage groups prepared by adding PFJ were also found to be statistically significant. The differences in the fermentation characteristics of the silages (pH, ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N), LA, AA, LA/AA, CO2, and total yeast mold after aerobic stability) were statistically significant too. When all parameters were examined, it was concluded that the addition of PFJ, which is prepared by adding 5% fructose to the meadow grass plant, to the maize silage has positive effects on IVOMD, ME, CH4, LA and yeast-mold and can be used instead of commercial inoculants.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AYDIN, S. S., DENEK, N. (2023). Effect of Adding Lactic Acid Bacteria to Maize Silage on Nutritive Guality, Fermentation Properties and in Vitro Digestibility. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 4, 1050–1058. https://ajindex.com/articles/1015869

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Adesogan A T & Arriola K G (2020). Bacterial inoculants for improving silage quality and animal performance. In: Proceedings of the 82nd Cornell Nutrition Congress, 19-22
  2. October, New York, pp. 42-57.
  3. Ali N, Wang S, Zhao J, Dong Z, Li J, Naza M & Shao T (2020). Microbial diversity and fermentation profile of red clover silage inoculated with reconstituted indigenous and exogenous epiphytic microbiota. Bioresource Technology 314: 123606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123606
  4. Altınçekiç E (2006). The effect of combination of organic acid-bacterial inoculant on the fermentation, aerobic stability and feed value of maize silage. Master's Thesis, Uludağ University, Bursa, Türkiye. AOAC (2005). Official methods of the association of official analytical chemists, 16th Edn. Arlington, TX: Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Aragón Y A (2012). The use of probiotic strains as silage inoculants. In: E C Rigobelo (Eds.), Probiotics in Animals, Croatia, pp. 1-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/50431
  5. Ashbell G, Weinberg Z G, Azrieli A, Hen Y & Horev B (1991). A simple system to study the aerobic determination of silages. Canadian Agricultural Engineering 34: 171-175.
  6. Axelsson L (1998). Lactic acid bacteria: classification and physiology. In: S. Salminen & A. von Wright, Lactic Acid Bacteria: Microbiology and Functional Aspects, 2nd (Edn), Revised and Expanded, Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 1–72. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780824752033.ch1 Aydin S S & Denek N (2022). Amount of lactic acid bacteria in fermented natural lactic acid bacteria liquids prepared with varying sucrose inclusion at different incubation periods. Medycyna Weterynaryjna 78(9): 456-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.21521/mw.6686
  7. Blajman J E, Vinderola G, Paez R B & Signorini ML (2020). The role of homofermentative and heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria for alfalfa silage: a meta-analysis. Journal of Agricultural Science 158(1-2): 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859620000386
  8. Bureenok S, Namihira T, Tamaki M, Mizumachi S, Kawamoto Y & Nakada T (2005a). Fermentative quality of guineagrass silage by using fermented juice of the epiphytic lactic acid bacteria (FJLB) as a silage additive. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 18(6): 807-811. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.807
  9. Bureenok S, Namihira T, Kawamoto Y & Nakada T (2005b). Additive effects of fermented juice of epiphytic lactic acid bacteria on the fermentative quality of guineagrass (Panicum maximum Jacq.) silage. Grassland S