Dergiler / Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Water Quality Monitoring Networks Using Principal Component Analysis: A case of Gediz River Basin

Sayfa
65–75
Yayın Tarihi
2018-03-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results reveal the tributaries of the river with different quality characteristics, and the importance of an objective based monitoring for effective water quality management.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The water quality needs to be monitored at regular intervals, throughout representatively located gauging stations, for sustainable development of water resources.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The 11 quality parameters monitored in 13 monitoring stations on the Gediz River Basin were used in the analyses.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results reveal the tributaries of the river with different quality characteristics, and the importance of an objective based monitoring for effective water quality management.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:principal component analysis · monitoring networks · water quality

Abstract

The water quality needs to be monitored at regular intervals, throughout representatively located gauging stations, for sustainable development of water resources. However, it is not possible to monitor all quality parameters all the time and points for a river basin studied, and water quality monitoring that does not address specific, clear and realistic objectives will cause time, labor and money losses. At this point, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) would provide a regional insight into principal pollutants, contaminants dominates others and effective monitoring locations. It will help to evaluate surface water quality in regional scale as well as monitoring network. This study aims to analyze regional water quality and monitoring network in the Gediz River Basin, by focusing on the variance structure of the observations on principal pollutants that observed throughout the river basin. The 11 quality parameters monitored in 13 monitoring stations on the Gediz River Basin were used in the analyses. PCA is applied i) to determine principal pollutants and contaminants dominate over others (parameter-based analysis), ii) to find out effective monitoring locations for principal pollutants (station based analysis). The results reveal the tributaries of the river with different quality characteristics, and the importance of an objective based monitoring for effective water quality management.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILMAZ, B., Özçelik, C. (2018). Evaluation of Water Quality Monitoring Networks Using Principal Component Analysis: A case of Gediz River Basin. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 65–75. https://ajindex.com/articles/101440

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Kurunc, A.; Yurekli, K.; Okman, C. Effects of Kilickaya dam on concentration and load values of water quality constituents in Kelkit stream in Turkey. Journal of Hydrology 2006, 317, 17-30
  2. Vega, M.; Pardo, R.; Barrado, E.; Deban, L. Assessment of seasonal and polluting effects on the quality of river water by exploratory data analysis. Water Research 1998, 32, 3581–3592
  3. Reisenhofer, E.; Adami, G.; Barbieri, P. Using chemical and physical parameters to define the quality of karstic freshwaters (Timavo River, North-eastern Italy): a chemometric approach. Water Research 1998, 32, 1193–1203
  4. Ahmad, S.; Khan, I.H.; Parida, B.P. Performance of stochastic approaches for forecasting river water quality. Water Research 2001, 35, 4261-4266
  5. Huang, W.; Foo, S. Neural network modeling of salinity variation in Apalachicola River. Water Research 2002, 36, 356–362
  6. Duran, M.; Demirer, G.N. Su Arıtımında Temel İşlemler (Unit Operations of Water Treatment); TMMOB Chamber of Environmental Engineers: Ankara, Turkey, 1997
  7. Tuncay, H. Su Kalitesi (Quality of water); Ege University Faculty of Agriculture Publications, 512: Izmir,Turkey, 1994
  8. Ministry of Forestry and Water Works (MoFW). Yerüstü Su Kalitesi Yönetimi Yönetmeliği (Surface Water Quality Management Regulations); Republic of Turkey Ministry of Forestry and Water Works: Ankara, Turkey, 2012
  9. Chapman, D. (Editor) Water Quality Assessment; Chapman & Hall, London, 1992
  10. Sârbu, C.; Pop, H.F. Principal component analysis versus fuzzy principal component analysis A case study: the quality of danube water (1985–1996). Talanta 2005, 65, 1215-1220
  11. Johnson, R.A., Wichern, D.W. (Editors) Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis (Third Edition), Prentice Hall International, New Jersey, 1992
  12. Petersen, W.; Bertino, L.; Callies, U.; Zorita, E. Process identification by principal component analysis of river water-quality data. Ecological Modelling 2001, 138, 193-213
  13. Antonopoulos, V.Z.; Papamichail, D.M.; Mitsiou, K.A. Statistical and trend analysis of water quality and quantity data for the Strymon River in Greece. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 2001, 5, 679-691
  14. Mellinger, M. Multivariate data analysis: Its methods. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1987, 2, 29-36
  15. Farnham, I.M.; Singh, A.K.; Stetzenbach, K.J.; Johnnesson, K.H. 2002. Treatment of nondetects in multivariate analysis of groundwater geochemistry data. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Sy