On the other hand, the findings indicated that age and gender have no significant effect onorganizational commitment level of employees.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Several researchers have examined organizational commitment concept because it has varying positiveconsequences for the organization and employees.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Therefore, the goal of this study is to examine if demographiccharacteristics of employees have a significant role in determining organizational commitment.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:On the other hand, the findings indicated that age and gender have no significant effect onorganizational commitment level of employees.
Several researchers have examined organizational commitment concept because it has varying positiveconsequences for the organization and employees. Therefore, the goal of this study is to examine if demographiccharacteristics of employees have a significant role in determining organizational commitment. Data gatheredfrom 50 employees of the various ports in Kocaeli is analyzed by using t-test, Anova and Tukey test. The resultsrevealed that marital status, educational level and job tenure have a significant effect on organizational commitmentlevel of employees. On the other hand, the findings indicated that age and gender have no significant effect onorganizational commitment level of employees.
ÖZBAĞ, G. K., ARSLAN, O. (2019). THE EFFECTS OF DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS ON ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT: AN INVESTIGATION ON TURKISH PORT STAFF. Uluslararası Turizm Ekonomi ve İşletme Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 549–560. https://ajindex.com/articles/1014369
Adekola, B. (2012). The Impact of Organizational Commitment on Job Satisfaction: A study of Employee at Nigerian Universities. International Journal of Human Resources Studies: 2, 20-29.
Affum-Osei, E., Acquaah, E. & Acheampong, P. (2015). Relationship between Organisational Commitment and Demographic Variables: Evidence from a Commercial Bank in Ghana. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management: 5, 769-778.
Altınöz, M., Çöp S., & Sığındı, T. (2011). Algılanan Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Örgütsel Sinizm İlişkisi: Ankara’daki Dört ve Beş Yıldızlı Konaklama İşletmeleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 15 (21), 285-315.
Bass, B.M. & Avolio, B.J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. California: Sage. Benjamin, A. (2012). Human Resource Development Climate and Employee Commitment in Recapitalized Nigerian Banks, International Journal of Business and Management, 7(5), 91-99.
Bhatnagar, J. (2007). Predictors of organizational commitment in India: strategic HR roles, organizational learning capability and psychological empowerment, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1782-811.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York, NY: John Wiley. Bozeman, D. B. & Perrewe, P. L (2001), The Effect of Item Content Overlap on Organizational Commitment Questionnaire: Turnover Cognitions Relationships, Journal of Applied Psychology: 86, 16-25.
Çekmecelioglu, G. H., (2006). Effects of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on creativity. Iktisat Isletme ve Finans: 21(243), 120-131.
Çekmecelioglu, G.H. & Eren, E. (2007).
Psikolojik Güçlendirme, Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Yaratıcı Davranış Arasındaki İlişkilerin Değerlendirilmesi, Yönetim: 18 (57), 13-25.
Chang, H., Chi, N. & Miao, M. (2007). Testing the Relationship between Three-component Organizational/Occupational Commitment and Organizational Occupational Turnover Intention Using a Non-recursive Model, Journal of Vocational Behavior: 70, 352-368.
Chang, S., Jia, L., Takeuchi, R., & Cai, Y. (2014). Do high-commitment work systems affect creativity? A multilevel combinational approach to employee creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology: 99, 665–680.
Chen, ZX & Francesco, AM (2003). The Relationship Between the Three Components of Commitment and Employee Performance in China. Journal of Vocational Behavior: 62, 490-510.
Chen, L.Y. (2002). An examination of the relationship between leadership behavior