KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Review of International Geographical Education Online / 2018 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

Analysis of Geography and Biology Teachers’ Self-Efficacy in Environmental Education

Tahsin YILDIRIM
Mustafa KIŞOĞLU
Muhammed SALMAN
Sayfa
240–254
Yayın Tarihi
2018-08-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Lastly, the study proposes different suggestions in the light of these findings.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Teachers have an important role in raising environmental awareness in individuals through environmental education and thus preventing environmental problems.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study was conducted through the survey model, and the study group consisted of 91 geography and biology teachers (41 female, 50 male) employed at high schools in Aksaray Province city center.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Lastly, the study proposes different suggestions in the light of these findings.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Environmental Education · Teacher Self-Efficacy · High School

Abstract

Teachers have an important role in raising environmental awareness in individuals through environmental education and thus preventing environmental problems. For this reason, the self-efficacy level of teachers in environmental education is crucial. This study aims at determining the self-efficacy levels of geography and biology teachers and analyzing these levels according to different variables (gender, subject field, years of service, and participation in scientific events related to environmental education). The study was conducted through the survey model, and the study group consisted of 91 geography and biology teachers (41 female, 50 male) employed at high schools in Aksaray Province city center. The “Environmental Education Self-Efficacy Scale” was used in the study as data collection tool. The scale consisted of 2 dimensions, namely subject knowledge and teaching strategy, and 24 items in total. Items in the survey were scaled between 0-100 points (with 10 points distance). Data collected was analyzed through Mann-Whitney-U and Kruskal Wallis tests, which are both nonparametric tests. Findings of the study suggest that the geography and biology teachers have a high level of self-efficacy in environmental education. Furthermore, no significant difference based on gender, subject, or years of service was found between the points the teachers obtained overall and from sub-dimensions. However, it was determined that the overall and sub-dimension points of the teachers who participated in scientific events related to environmental education were statistically higher than of those who did not participate in such events. Lastly, the study proposes different suggestions in the light of these findings.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILDIRIM, T., KIŞOĞLU, M., SALMAN, M. (2018). Analysis of Geography and Biology Teachers’ Self-Efficacy in Environmental Education. Review of International Geographical Education Online, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 240–254. https://ajindex.com/articles/1004599

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Akkuzu, N. & Akçay, H. (2012). Kimya öğretmen adaylarının öz yeterlik inançlarının farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi (Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi örneği). Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 12(3), 2195-2216.
  2. Aşkar, P., & Umay, A. (2001). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenliği öğretmen adaylarının bilgisayarla ilgili öz-yeterlik algısı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 1-8.
  3. Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1-45). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman Benzer, F. (2011). İlköğretim ve ortaöğretim kurumlarında görev yapan öğretmenlerin öz yeterlik algılarının analizi. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Selçuk Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Konya. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/ adresinden edinilmiştir. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı istatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum. (7. Baskı), Ankara:
  5. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Çapri, B., & Kan, A. (2007). Öğretmenlerin kişilerarası öz-yeterlik inançlarının hizmet süresi, okul türü, öğretim kademesi ve unvan değişkenleri açısından incelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 63-83.
  6. Çimen, O., Gökmen, A., Altunsoy, S., Ekici, G. & Yılmaz, M. (2011). Analysis of biology candidate teachers’ self –efficacy beliefs on environmental education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2549-2553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.143
  7. Dilekli, Y., & Tezci, E. (2016). The relationship among teachers’ classroom practices for teaching thinking skills, teachers’ self-efficacy towards teaching thinking skills and teachers’ teaching styles. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 144-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.06.001
  8. Dobson, A. & Bell, D. (Ed). (2006).
  9. Environmental citizenship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  10. Ekici, G. (2006). Meslek lisesi öğretmenlerinin öğretmen öz-yeterlik inançları üzerine bir araştırma. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 24, 87-96.
  11. Erkol, M., Erbasan, Ö., Aydoğdu, B. & Kıvrak, E. (2017, Kasım). Öğretmenlerin çevre eğitimi öz-yeterliklerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi: Kıdem ve çalışılan yer [Öz]. 1. Uluslar arası Sosyal Bilimler ve Eğitim Araştırmaları Sempozyumunda sunulan bildiri, Antalya. Retrieved from http://www.iscer.org/iscer-ozet.pdf
  12. Erten, S. (2004). Çevre eğitimi