KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Medical Science and Discovery / 2015 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3

Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal methods of hysterectomy from patient’s perspective

COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND ABDOMINAL METHODS OF HYSTERECTOMY FROM PATIENT’S PERSPECTIVE

Hasan Terzi
Pinar Hasdemir
Sertan Aksu
Ahmet Kale
Semra Koltan
Sayfa
208–210
Yayın Tarihi
2015-03-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Hospital stay, need for analgesic use, visual analoque scala pain scores in 12, 24 and 36 hours and patient satisfaction scores in 24,48 hours and 1st weeks, blood loss were statistically less in laparoscopic hysterectomy group than abdominal hysterectomy group (p<0,001).Conclusion: Laparoscopic hysterectomy was a superior method than abdominal hysterectomy on short term follow-up, patients postoperative pain and satisfaction of the operation scar.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aims: To compare the postoperative pain and satisfaction of the patients who operated with total laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy methods for benign gynecologic conditions.Methods: This study was a prospective randomized trial.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Visual Analoque Scala and Patient Satisfaction Score Scalas were used to evaluate patients postoperative satisfaction rate.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Hospital stay, need for analgesic use, visual analoque scala pain scores in 12, 24 and 36 hours and patient satisfaction scores in 24,48 hours and 1st weeks, blood loss were statistically less in laparoscopic hysterectomy group than abdominal hysterectomy group (p<0,001).Conclusion: Laparoscopic hysterectomy was a superior method than abdominal hysterectomy on short term follow-up, patients postoperative pain and satisfaction of the operation scar.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Abdominal Hysterectomy · Laparoscopic hysterectomy · Pain

Abstract

Aims: To compare the postoperative pain and satisfaction of the patients who operated with total laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy methods for benign gynecologic conditions.Methods: This study was a prospective randomized trial. Visual Analoque Scala and Patient Satisfaction Score Scalas were used to evaluate patients postoperative satisfaction rate. Seventyone patients who operated by total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with 68 patients who operated by total abdominal hysterectomy for benign gynecologic indications.Results: The groups were similar in respect to age, race, gravidy and parity status and uterine weight. Hospital stay, need for analgesic use, visual analoque scala pain scores in 12, 24 and 36 hours and patient satisfaction scores in 24,48 hours and 1st weeks, blood loss were statistically less in laparoscopic hysterectomy group than abdominal hysterectomy group (p<0,001).Conclusion: Laparoscopic hysterectomy was a superior method than abdominal hysterectomy on short term follow-up, patients postoperative pain and satisfaction of the operation scar.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Terzi, H., Hasdemir, P., Aksu, S., Kale, A., Koltan, S. (2015). Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal methods of hysterectomy from patient’s perspective. Medical Science and Discovery, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3, 208–210. https://ajindex.com/articles/1003146

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Brummer THI, Jalkanen J, Fraser J. National Prospective 1-Year Survey of 5279 Hysterectomies. Hum Reprod. 2009
  2. Reich H, De Caprio J, Mc Glynn F. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surgery. 1989
  3. Falcone T, Paraiso MF, Mascha E. Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999
  4. 180(4):955-62. - Candiani M, Izzo S. Laparoscopic versus vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010
  5. 22(4):304-8. - Reips and F. Funke. "Interval level measurement with visual analogue scales in Internet-based research: VAS Generator." 2008. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.699 - Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006
  6. 19(2):CD003677. - Garry R, Fountain J, Brown J, Manca A, Mason S, Sculpher M, et al. EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy. Health Technol Assess. 2004
  7. 8(26):1-154. - Jahan, S., Das, T.R., Mahmud, N., Mondol, S.K., Habib, S.H., Saha, S., et al. A Comparative study among laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy: Experience in a tertiary care hospital in Bangladesh. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2011
  8. 31(3):254-257. - Oscarsson U, Poromaa IS, Nüssler E, Löfgren M. No difference in length of hospital stay between laparoscopic and abdominal supravaginal hysterectomy--a preliminary study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006
  9. 85(6):682-7. - Sutasanasuang, S. Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: A retrospective comparative study. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 2011
  10. 94(1):8-16 - Wiser, A., Holcroft, C.A., Tulandi, T., Abenhaim, H.A. Abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign diseases: Evaluation of morbidity and mortality among 465,798 cases. Gynecological Surgery 2013
  11. 10(2):117-122 - Kumar A, Pearl M. Mini-laparotomy versus laparoscopy for gynecologic conditions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014
  12. 21(1):109-14. - Sirisabya N, Manchana T. Mini-laparotomy vs laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynaecological diseases. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014
  13. 34(1):65-9. - Kluivers KB, Hendriks JC, Mol BW, Bongers MY, Bremer GL, de Vet HC, et al. Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus