KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations / 2016 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

Laparoscopic Uterine Nerve Ethanol Neurolysis (LUNEN) in Patients with Chronic Pelvic Pain

Seyhan SÖNMEZ
Ümit NAYKI
Paşa ULUĞ
Cenk NAYKI
Ferhan SÖNMEZ
Şivekar TINAR
Yusuf YILDIRIM
Sayfa
7–13
Yayın Tarihi
2016-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

J Clin Exp Invest 2016; 7 (1): 7-13

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: To investigate the efficacy of laparoscopic uterine nerve ethanol neurolysis (LUNEN) for pain management in patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: LUNEN, as a chemical neurolysis procedure, was performed on 22 subjects, and these were compared with 20 controls that had a diagnostic laparoscopy alone.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:J Clin Exp Invest 2016; 7 (1): 7-13
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Chronic pelvic pain · uterine nerve neurolysis · laparoscopy

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of laparoscopic uterine nerve ethanol neurolysis (LUNEN) for pain management in patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP). Methods: LUNEN, as a chemical neurolysis procedure, was performed on 22 subjects, and these were compared with 20 controls that had a diagnostic laparoscopy alone. Pre-treatment and postoperative 6th month Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were estimated and a subjective pain evaluation questioning patients’ satisfaction about pain relief in the 6th month after surgery was also performed. Results: A total of 31 (73.8%) out of 42 CPP patients had a laparoscopic pelvic pathology. Preoperative VAS scores were similar in the groups; however, the mean postoperative VAS score was significantly lower in the LUNEN group than in the control group (3.18 ± 2.88 vs. 5.35 ± 3.09; p=0.02). In the LUNEN group, the number of patients who stated that their pain was relieved partially or completely was also significantly higher than in the control group (82% vs. 40%, p=0.019). Conclusion: LUNEN is a feasible, safe and effective surgical alternative to traditional surgical methods in patients suffering from CPP. J Clin Exp Invest 2016; 7 (1): 7-13

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SÖNMEZ, S., NAYKI, Ü., ULUĞ, P., NAYKI, C., SÖNMEZ, F., TINAR, Ş., YILDIRIM, Y. (2016). Laparoscopic Uterine Nerve Ethanol Neurolysis (LUNEN) in Patients with Chronic Pelvic Pain. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 7–13. https://ajindex.com/articles/1001199

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Duffy S. Chronic pelvic pain: defining the scope of the problem (2001) Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001;74:3-7
  2. Palomba S, Russo T, Falbo A, et al. Laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation versus vaginal uterosacral ligament resection in postmenopausal women with intractable midline chronic pelvic pain: A randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006;129:84–91
  3. Zondervan KT, Yudkin PL, Vessey MP, et al. Chronic pelvic pain in the community symptoms, investigation, and diagnoses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1149–1155
  4. Stein SL. Chronic pelvic pain. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2013;42:785-800
  5. Weijenborg PT, Greeven A, Dekker FW, et al. Clinical course of chronic pelvic pain in women. Pain 2007;132:117–123
  6. Porpora MG, Gomel V. The role of laparoscopy in the management of pelvic pain in women of reproductive age. Fertil Steril 1997;68:765–779
  7. Carter JE. Surgical treatment for chronic pelvic pain. JSLS 1998;2:129–139
  8. Sharma D, Dahiya K, Duhan N, Bansal R. Diagnostic laparoscopy in chronic pelvic pain. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011;283:295-297 9. Demir F, Ozcimen EE, Oral HB. The role of gynecological, urological, and psychiatric factors in chronic pelvic pain. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;286:1215-1220
  9. Frankenhauser G. Die Bewegungenerven der Gebarmutter. Z Med Nat Wiss 1864;1:35
  10. Johnson NP, Farquar CM, Crossley S, et al. A doubleblind randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation for women with chronic pelvic pain. BJOG 2004;111:950–959
  11. Daniels J, Gray R, Khan KS, Gupta J. Laparoscopic uterine nevre ablation: a survey of gynaecological practice in UK. Gynecol Endosc 2000;9:157–159
  12. Davis GD. Uterine prolapse after laparoscopic uterosacral transection in nulliparous airborne trainees: a report of three cases. J Reprod Med 1986;41:279-282
  13. Patt RB. Cancer pain. In Patt RB(ed):Cancer Pain. Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1993, pp377-425
  14. Rowe DS. Neurolytic techniques for pain management. Pain Clin 1995; 8:107-115
  15. Mathias SD, Kuppermann M, Liberman RF, et al. Chronic pelvic pain: prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic correlates. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:321–327
  16. Kresch AJ, Seifer DB, Sachs LB, Barrese I Laparoscopy in the evalution of 100 women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 1984;64:672
  17. Vercellini P, Fedele L, Molteni P, et al. Laparoscopy in the diagnosis of gynecologic chronic pelvic pain. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1990;32:261-265
  18. Levitan Z, Eibschitz I, de Vr