KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations / 2017 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

Prevalence of Impacted Wisdom Teeth in Middle Black Sea Population

Ferhat AYRANCİ
Sayfa
58–61
Yayın Tarihi
2017-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The pattern of third molar impaction in the Middle Black Sea region was characterized by a high prevalence of level C impaction with a vertical position that was greater in the mandibles and had no sex predilection.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this cross-sectional randomized study was to investigate the prevalence and angulation of third molar impaction in patients between 19‒26 years old who were living in the Middle Black Sea region of Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Total 1006 patients between 19 and 26 years of age who were referred to the Ordu University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery between 2010 and 2015 were included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The pattern of third molar impaction in the Middle Black Sea region was characterized by a high prevalence of level C impaction with a vertical position that was greater in the mandibles and had no sex predilection.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Pell and Gregory · prevalence · Turkish population

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this cross-sectional randomized study was to investigate the prevalence and angulation of third molar impaction in patients between 19‒26 years old who were living in the Middle Black Sea region of Turkey. Methods: Total 1006 patients between 19 and 26 years of age who were referred to the Ordu University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery between 2010 and 2015 were included in the study. Of these 1,006 patients, 410 were male and 596 were female. The prevalence and positions of the impacted third molar teeth from the 4th quadrant on the panoramic radiographs were documented according to the classifications of Pell and Gregory as well as that of Winter. In the Pell and Gregory classification, the teeth in class C were evaluated as impacted teeth. Results: There was a total of 1,518 impacted molars. Of the included patients, 48.3% had impacted third molars. The most common angulation of impacted third molars was the vertical position in both mandible (28.4%) and maxilla (28.8%). The prevalence of impacted mandibular third molars (57.3%) was significantly higher than that of the impacted maxillary third molars (42.7%) (P<0.05). The prevalence and angulation of impacted third molars between genders was not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion: The pattern of third molar impaction in the Middle Black Sea region was characterized by a high prevalence of level C impaction with a vertical position that was greater in the mandibles and had no sex predilection.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AYRANCİ, F. (2017). Prevalence of Impacted Wisdom Teeth in Middle Black Sea Population. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 58–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/1001161

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Hassan AH. Pattern of third molar impaction in a Saudi population Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2010;2:109-113
  2. Dachi SF, Howell FV. A survey of 3,874 routine full-mouth radiographs. I. A study of retained roots and teeth Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1961;14:916-924
  3. Eshghpour M, Rezaei NM, Nejat A. Effect of menstrual cycle on frequency of alveolar osteitis in women undergoing surgical removal of mandibular third molar: a single-blind randomized clinical trial J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71:1484-1489
  4. Bishara SE. Impacted maxillary canines: a review Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:159-171
  5. Akarslan ZZ, Kocabay C. Assessment of the associated symptoms, pathologies, positions and angulations of bilateral occurring mandibular third molars: is there any similarity? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:e26-32
  6. Hattab FN, Rawashdeh MA, Fahmy MS. Impaction status of third molars in Jordanian students Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;79:24-29
  7. Al-Anqudi SM, Al-Sudairy S, Al-Hosni A, Al-Maniri A. Prevalence and Pattern of Third Molar Impaction: A retrospective study of radiographs in Oman Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2014;14:e388-392
  8. Molander B, Ahlqwist M, Grondahl HG, Hollender L. Agreement between panoramic and intra-oral radiography in the assessment of marginal bone height Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1991;20:155-160
  9. Emine Sen Tunç AEK. Prevalence Of Congenitally Missing Permanent Teeth In Blacksea Region Children Atatürk Univ. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 2006 2:37-40 10. Pell GJ GG. Impacted mandibular third molars: Classification and Impacted mandibular third molars: Classification and modified technique for removal Dent Dig. 1933;39:330-338
  10. Gupta S, Bhowate RR, Nigam N, Saxena S. Evaluation of impacted mandibular third molars by panoramic radiography ISRN Dent 2011;2011:406714
  11. Santosh P. Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: Review of Literature and a Proposal of a Combined Clinical and Radiological Classification Ann Med Health Sci Res 2015;5:229-234
  12. Yilmaz S, Adisen MZ, Misirlioglu M, Yorubulut S. Assessment of Third Molar Impaction Pattern and Associated Clinical Symptoms in a Central Anatolian Turkish Population Med Princ Pract 2016;25:169-175
  13. Hashemipour MA, Tahmasbi-Arashlow M, Fahimi-Hanzaei F. Incidence of impacted mandibular and maxillary third molars: a radiographic study in a Southeast Iran population Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013;18:e140-145
  14. Almendros-Marques N