Examining the 360° Case Conceptualization Process: A Comparison of Two Groups

Abstract

An examination of the differences between two supervision models/processes used for case conceptualizations in group supervision was conducted. The first group utilized a relatively new construct, titled the 360° Case Conceptualization Process, which incorporates a strengths-based method encouraging reflective practice and risk taking. The second group in the study utilized a supervision format that assigns a familiar fictional character of interest to each group (Peer Roles). The authors utilized a case study design to provide an in-depth look at the 360° Process in practice while also making some comparisons to a group supervision class utilizing a different model. Results demonstrated the 360° Process group focused more on developmental considerations of both the counselor and the client and utilized less instructor directives than the Peer Roles group.