Personnel radiation dose assessment using a novel dosimeter in the department of radiology and dentistry in a medical facility in Delta State, South-South Nigeria: our experience in the last 4 years

Abstract

Objectives. Large percentages of X-ray facilities in Nigeria do not use radiation monitoring device; a fewpercentage that use them do not evaluate or carryout out assessment programs to ascertain the detriment tooccupationally exposed workers. This study was aimed at evaluating dose reports from 2013 to 2016 forpersonnel who operate radiation facilities and those that work within radiation field during certain X-rayprocedures/examinations in the department of radiology and dentistry respectively; to ascertain if there iscorrelation between personnel dose and workload in both department and to determine if dose records arewithin acceptable limit recommended by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safety series.Methods. Direct Ion Storage (DIS) dosimeter was used for a total of 35 occupationally exposed personnel whowork in the department of radiology and dentistry. The DIS dosimeter was read every two months and resultswere authomatically saved on the instadoseTMplatform. Results. The mean (total) dose in radiology departmentfor the first, second, third and fourth year was 0.17 ± 0.08 (3.52) mSv, 0.08 ± 0.03 (0.77) mSv, 0.07 ± 0.04(0.72) mSv and 0.07 ± 0.05 (0.55) mSv and in Dentistry was 0.08 ± 0.02 (0.73) mSv, 0.05 ± 0.02 (0.42) mSv,0.05 ± 0.02 (0.24) mSv and 0.07 ± 0.04 (0.34) mSv; respectively. There was significant difference in meanpersonnel dose from 2013-2016 in Radiology (p=0.028) and in Dentistry Department (p=0.004). Correlationof workload and personnel dose in Radiology (p=0.240) and Dentistry Department (p=0.765) wasn’t significant.There was no correlation in mean dose between both department (p=0.256). Conclusion. Overall mean dosein both department for occupationally exposed personnel were below IAEA annual dose limit of 20 mSvaveraged over a period of 5 consecutive years. Dose reports of personnel in both department reduced as theyear progressed due to radiation safety awareness