Comparison between periarticular injection and intraarticular infusion for pain control following total knee arthroplasty

Abstract

Objectives: To compare periarticular infiltration and intraarticular continuous infusion methods in painmanagement following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).Methods: Patients who underwent TKA from May 2015 through September 2015 according to theirpostoperative pain protocol were compared. The patients who received bupivacaine by periarticular infiltration(PAI group) and intraarticular infusion (IAI group) were included in the study. Patients also received a treatmentthrough intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. The frequency of patients’ bolus need and thetramadol dose used via PCA device, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores and clinical evaluation as active kneeflexion at the postoperative 3th day were obtained from the patient follow - up forms and records. Side effectsrelated to narcotic analgesic medications were also obtained.Results: The study included 90 patients, of whom 46 were in the PAI group (median age, 65.5 years; females,82.6%) and 44 were in the IAI group (median age: 65.5 years; females, 81.8%). The VAS pain scores assessedat various postoperative time points and tramadol consumption were usually lower in the IAI group than inthe PAI group. No difference was determined between the groups regarding the 3th-day VAS scores in flexionand in terms of analgesia-associated side effects.Conclusions: Bupivacaine administration by IAI for postoperative pain management following TKA isassociated with lower pain and lower tramadol consumption as compared with bupivacaine administration byPAI. The groups were comparable in terms of side effects. Accordingly, IAI seems to be an effective and safeanalgesic technique for patients undergoing TKA.