Where are We in Cosmetics and Esthetics Practices in Educational Clinics in Turkey?

Özet

Objective: Cosmetic dermatology has recently gained importance with the recent increase in demand. The aim of this study is to identifycosmetic dermatology training in Turkey and to assess instructors’ attitudes toward cosmetic dermatology training during residency and currentcosmetic dermatology practices. Methods: This is a cross‑sectional questionnaire study conducted with instructors to investigate the practice ofcosmetics dermatology, the technical equipments, number of patients, and their ideas in the clinics that provide dermatology specialty educationin Turkey. Results: At least one cosmetic procedure was found to be performed in 69% of the clinics that participated in the study (n = 55),and no cosmetic procedure was performed in 31% of the clinics. The mean number of application was 13.2 ± 12.3 weekly in the clinics thatperformed cosmetics procedure. The most common procedures were botulinum toxin injection with 63.6% (n = 35), chemical peeling with60% (n = 33), and platelet‑rich plasma with 60% (n = 33), respectively. The most common laser application was neodymium‑doped yttriumaluminum garnet (28/55). The mean time spent for cosmetic procedures was 1–5 h weekly in the clinics which performed cosmetic procedures.Seventy‑six percent (n = 42) of the participants felt inadequate for performing cosmetics procedures, and 95% (n = 52) reported that cosmeticdermatology education was required. Conclusions: Both theoretical and practical education must be given in educational clinics, and theinfrastructure must be created, and the educational schedule must be standardized.