Applicability of ASA classification system in elective endovascular aneurysm repair

Özet

Objectives: This study aims to examine the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of Physical Status as a preoperativerisk prediction method for early mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of aninfrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).Patients and methods: A total of 134 consecutive patients (124 males, 10 females; mean age 69.6±6.9 years; range, 52 to 85 years) with aninfrarenal AAA who underwent EVAR between January 2012 and January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were dividedinto two groups as Group 1 (low risk; ASA I-II; n=63) and Group 2 (high risk; ASA III-IV; n=71). Early and postoperative one-yearmortality and morbidity were evaluated.Results: The overall early mortality rate was 1.4%. None of the patients were converted to open surgery and overall technical success was100%. Unibody grafts were performed in 33% patients in Group 1 and 59.2% patients in Group 2 (p=0.003). The length of intensive careunit and hospital stay was longer in Group 2, although it did not reach statistical significance. A total of 64% of local/locoregional anesthesiawas performed in Group 2 high-risk patients.Conclusion: Regardless of the ASA risk group, EVAR can be performed successfully. The ASA classification may be useful for decision oftreatment modality. Patients unfit for open surgery can be managed safely by EVAR.