Comparison of treatment results between surgical and conservative treatment of distal radius fractures in adults: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Özet

Objective: This meta-analysis study aims to determine the efficacy and safety of surgical and conservative treatments for distal radiusfractures (DRFs) in adults.Methods: Reports of randomized controlled trials were retrieved from the Web of Science, Pubmed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, CochraneLibrary, Medline, Ovid, and BIOSIS for studies that met the eligibility criteria. The search was limited to human subjects and had nolanguage limits. The search strategy was check by two independent reviewers. If there was any dispute, a third reviewer was consulted.Primary outcomes were: (1) the active wrist range of motion including flexion, extension, pronation, supination, radial, and ulnar deviation; (2) the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score; and (3) radiological outcomes including radial inclination andulnar variance. Secondary outcomes were the number of complications including non-infectious and infectious. Quality assessment wasperformed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool provided by the Cochrane Review Manager 5.3.Results: A total of 10 randomized controlled trials were included. The meta-analysis detected no statistically significant difference inpooled data for complications not included infection (MD 0.64, CI: 0.33 to 1.23, Z=1.34, p=0.18). Surgical treatment achieved a better rangeof motion (MD 3.76, CI: 1.58 to 5.95, Z=3.37, p=0.0007), DASH score (MD -6.57, CI: -9.08 to -4.06, Z=5.12, p<0.00001), and radiographicoutcomes (MD 3.75, CI: 2.75 to 4.74, Z=7.37, p<0.00001) compared with conservative treatment. In contrast, the conservative treatmentachieved less infection rate compared with surgical treatment (MD 4.09, CI: 1.18 to 14.21, Z=2.21, p=0.03).Conclusion: Findings of this study reveal that when compared with conservative treatment, surgical treatment can ensure better clinical andradiological results for the treatment of DRFs in adults. Although similar complication rates can be encountered with both treatment modalities, it should be taken into account that the rate of infection may be higher in surgical treatment.Level of Evidence: Level I, Therapeutic Study