| Kitap İncelemesi: Feyzan Erkip’in “Piyasa Yapmanın Yeni Yüzleri: AVM’ler, Sokaklar, Kentler” Başlıklı Çalışması | Burcu Halide ÖZÜDURU | 147–148 |
| Data Infrastructure for the Sense of Claiming the City: The Inventory of Cultural Assets and Sharing it in the Process of Glocalization | Aygün ERDOĞAN | 154–171 |
| Konut Piyasası Aktörleri Gözünden Türk Planlama Sistemi | Elif ALKAY | 172–186 |
| Evaluation of Variables Constituting Urban Consciousness in Ankara by Factor Analysis | Leyla Alkan GÖKLER,Sevinç Bahar YENİGÜL,Özge Yalçıner ERCOŞKUN,Ebru Vesile ÖCALİR AKÜNAL | 187–197 |
| The Issue of The Areas That are Removed Outside the Forest Boundaries From the Planning Perspective: İstanbul Case | Pelin Pınar GİRİTLİOĞLU | 198–220 |
| Adramytteion Ancient City Comprehensive Heritage Preservation Plan | Seher BAŞLIK,Mehmet Rıfat AKBULUT | 221–241 |
| Critical Outlook on Nature Protection Areas Which Announced According to 2873 National Park Law After 2002 | Gencay SERTER | 242–256 |
| Adaptive Planning: Examining Adaptation Based Urban Policies and Practices in Turkey | İrem İNCE KELLER,Nursen KAYA EROL | 257–272 |
| Planlamaya Rağmen Kentte Var Olabilmek: İzmir Konak’ta Bir Kadın Dostu Kent İncelemesi | Mercan EFE GÜNEY,Senem TEZCAN,Ceren AĞIN | 273–293 |
| Being Able to Exist in the City In Defiance of Planning: An Examination on a Woman-Friendly City in İzmir – Konak | Mercan EFE GÜNEY, Senem TEZCAN, Ceren AĞIN | 273–293 |
| Climate Sensitive Urban Design Principles: The Case of Erzurum City | Merve YAVAŞ,Sevgi YILMAZ | 294–312 |
| Kentsel Alanda CBS Kullanarak Bisiklet Altyapısı Rota Planlaması: İzmir Örneği | Sevim Pelin ÖZKAN,Fatma ŞENOL,Zeynep ÖZCAM | 313–327 |
| Bicycle Route Infrastructure Planning Using GIS in an Urban Area: The Case of İzmir | Fatma ŞENOL, Zeynep ÖZCAM, Sevim Pelin ÖZKAN |