| Combination of ground gravimetry and GOCE data for local geoid determination: A simulation study | A. MAGGI,F. MIGLIACCIO,M. REGUZZONI,N. TSELFES | 1–6 |
| Determination of the quasigeoid by solving the Neumann boundary value problem | Marcel MOJZES,Juraj JANAK,Juraj PAPCO,Michal SPRLAK,Milos VAL'KO | 7–12 |
| OCTAS with a focus on the importance of a high accuracy geoid | O.C.D. OMANG,D. SOLHEIM,A HUNEGNAW,D.I. LYSAKER,K. GHAZAVI,H. NAHAVANDCHI | 13–18 |
| Error evaluation for regional geoid computation using varying integration cap sizes in a synthetic environment | K. I. WOLF,B. KİELER | 19–24 |
| Optimized solution and a numerical treatment of two-boundary problems in combining terrestrial and satellite data | P. HOLOTA,O. NESVADBA | 25–30 |
| Ground-vehicle INS/GPS vector gravimetry assessment using repeated traverses in Montana | X LI,C. JEKELI | 31–36 |
| Centimetre quasigeoid modelling in Poland using heterogeneous data | Jan KRYNSKI,Adam LYSZKOWICZ | 37–42 |
| Wavelet evaluation of the terrain correction integral | M. EL-HABIBY,M. G. SIDERIS | 43–48 |
| Local geoid surface approximation by fuzzy inference systems: Case studies in Turkey | Mustafa ACAR,M. Tevfik ÖZLÜDEMİR,Rahmi Nurhan ÇELİK,Tevfik AYAN | 49–54 |
| Different gravimetric geoid models over Iran with and without terrestrial gravity data | H. NAHAVANDCHI,A. SOLTANPOUR | 55–60 |
| A data set to test geoid computation methods | H. DUQUENNE | 61–65 |
| Application of fuzzy logic theory to geoid height determination | M. YILMAZ,E. ARSLAN | 66–71 |
| A new Taiwanese geoid model based upon airborne, satellite and terrestrial gravimetric data | A. ELMANN,C. HWANG,Y-S. HSIAO | 72–77 |
| Artificial neural network versus surface polynomials for determinetion of local geoid | H. S. KUTOĞLU | 78–83 |
| Astrogeodetic validation of gravimetric quasigeoid models in the German Alps- first results | Christian HIRT,Heiner DENKER,Jakob FLURY,Andreas LINDAU,Günter SEEBER | 84–89 |
| Validation of marine geoid models in the North Aegean Sea using satellite altimetry, marine GPS data and astrogeodetic measurements | A. MULLER,B. BURKI,P. LIMPACH,H. G. KAHLE,V. N. GRIGORIADIS,G. S. VERGOS,I.N. TZIAVOS | 90–95 |
| Fitting gravimetric guasigeoid model to GPS/levelling data in Poland | Jan KRNYSKI,Adam LYSZKOWICZ | 96–101 |
| Modified Stokes' kernel versus window technique: Comparison of optimum combination of gravity field wavelengths in geoid computation | Hussein A. ABD-ELMOTAAL,Norbert KUEHTREIBER | 102–107 |
| Combination of deflections of the vertical and gravity anomalies in difficult geological regions, a case study | B. WIESENHOFER,N. KUHTREIBER | 108–112 |
| Realization of a global vertical reference system | Johannes IHDE | 113–120 |
| Twelve years of developments: Geoidal geopotential $W_0$ for the establishment of a World Height System-present state and future | M. BURSA,Z. SIMA,S. KENYON,J. KOUBA,V. VATRT,Marie VOJTISKOVA | 121–123 |
| EUVN_DA: Establishment of a European continental GPS/leveling network | A. KENYERES,M. SACHER,J. IHDE,H. DENKER,U. MARTI | 124–129 |
| Interrelation between the geoid and orthometric heights | A. ELLMANN,P. VANICEK,M SANTOS,R. KINGDON | 130–135 |
| On the problem of geoid height transformation between different geodetic reference frames | Christopher KOTSAKIS | 136–141 |
| Realization of the vertical datum and height system of Lithuania | B. KRIKSTAPONIS,E. PARSELIUNAS,P. PETROSKEVICIUS,R. PUTRIMAS,A. ZAKAREVICIUS,S. URBANAS | 142–147 |
| Determination of the mean sea level at Algiers Harbour from the tidal data analysis | M. HADDAD,H. ABDELLAOUI,N. AMRANE | 148–150 |
| Some aspects of harmonic analysis of data gridded on the ellipsoid | Simon A. HOLMES,Nikolaos K. PAVLIS | 151–156 |
| LSQR based geopotential recovery | O. BAUR,J. KUSCHE | 157–162 |
| A new approach for determining the potential field | Wen Bin SHEN | 163–168 |
| Joint SST and SGG gravity field solutions using the torus approach | Chen XU,Nico SNEEUW,Michael G. SIDERIS | 169–174 |
| Spectral assessment of recently released CHAMP and GRACE satellite-only earth gravity models | D. TSOULIS,K. PATLAKIS | 175–180 |
| Gravity field modeling on the basis of GRACE rangerate combinations: Current results and challenge | Pavel DITMAR,Xianglin LIU | 181–186 |
| High-degree geopotential model tailored to Egypt | Hussein A. ABD-ELMOTAAL | 187–192 |
| ITG-Grace02s: A Grace gravity field derived from range measurements of short arcs | T. MAYER-GURR,A. EICKER,K. H. ILK | 193–198 |
| Towards a characterization of temporal gravity field variations in GRACE observations and global hydrology models | S. PETROVIC,R. SCHMIDT,J. WUNSCH,F. BARTHELMES,A. GUNTNER,M. ROTHACHER | 199–204 |
| Satellite-to-satellite laser tracking mission for gravity field measurement | Stefano CESARE,Gianfranco SECHI,Luciana BONINO,Roberto SABADINI,Anna Maria MAROTTA,Federica MIGLIACCIO,Mirko REGUZZONI,Fernando SANSO,Andrea MILANI,Marco PISANI,Bruno LEONE,Pierluigi SILVESTRIN | 205–210 |
| Gravity recovery capability of four generic satellite formation | M. A. SHARIFI,N. SNEEUW,W. KELLER | 211–216 |
| How to properly scale GRACE estimates of the continental water storage variations? | R. KLEES,E. A. ZAPREEVA,H.C. WINSEMIUS,H. H. G. SAVENIJE | 217–222 |
| GOCE gradiometer validation in satellite track cross-overs | F. JARECKI,J. MULLER | 223–228 |
| Inverting the Stokes and Vening Meinesz integrals using the wavelet transform | M. EL-HABIBY,M. G. SIDERIS | 229–234 |
| Determination of the quasi-stationary sea surface topography from a common adjustment of a geodetic and an oceanographic model | G. S. VERGOS,I. N. TZİAVOI | 235–241 |
| Gravity anomalies and sea ice thickness in the Arctic Ocean from ICESat | H. SKOURUP,R. FORSBERG,A. BRAUN | 242–247 |
| Determination of evaluation of the altimetric mean level of the Western Mediterranean from the Jason-1 data: Comparison with analysis of tidal gauge measurements | M. HADDAD,H. ABDELLAOUI,N. AMRANE,M. F. BELBACHIR | 248–252 |
| Sea surface topography by airborne laser altimetry and offshore GPS buoys in the Eastern Mediterranean: Comparison with JASON-1 radar altimeter data and GRACE gravity field | P. LIMPACH,A. GEIGER,H. G. KAHLE | 253–258 |
| Downward continuation and geoid determination in Mongolia from airborne and surface gravimetry and SRTM topography | Rene FORSBERG,A. OLESEN | 259–264 |
| Airborne gravity gradiometry for exploration geophysics- the first 5 years | K. ZUIDWEG,G.R. MUMAW | 265–270 |
| System functions estimates for airborne gravimetry | G. BOEDECKER | 271–276 |
| Airborne scalar gravimetry for regional gravity field mapping and determination | A.V. OLESEN,R. FORSBERG | 277–282 |
| Gravity field modelling from airborne gravimetry using fundamental solutions of Laplace's equation in cartesian coordinates | B. A. ALBERTS,R. KLEES,P. DITMAR | 283–288 |
| Comparing methods to model the local gravity gradients from gravity anomalies | Lizhi ZHU,Christopher JEKELI | 289–294 |
| Gravity-lidar study for 2006: Refined gravity field for the North-Central Gulf of Mexico | D.R. Roman,Y. M. WANG,J. M. BROZENA,V. A. CHILDERS,D.L. RABINE,S. B. LUTCKE,J. B. BLAIR,S. A. MARTINKA,M.A. HOFTON | 295–299 |
| Outline of a new space-domain method of forward modeling | G. STRYKOWSKI | 300–305 |
| Residual terrain correction on the sphere by an FFT algorithm | D. SAMPIETRO,G. SONA,G. VENUTI | 306–311 |
| Comparison of the modelling of topographic and isostatic masses in the space and the frequency domain for use in satellite gravity gradiometry | F. WILD-PFEIFFER,B. HECK | 312–317 |
| Terrain-related gravimetric quantities computed for the next EGM | Nikolaos K. PAVLIS,John K. FACTOR,Simon A. HOLMES | 318–323 |
| Evaluation of the SRTM data over Argentina and its implications to gravity field and geoid modelling | C. TOCHO,G. S. VERGOS,M. G. SIDERIS | 324–329 |
| An approach for determining the precise global geoid | WenBin SHEN | 330–335 |
| Geophysical inversion of on board satellite gradiometer data: A feasibility study in the ALPACA region, Central Europe | Judit BENEDEK,Gabor PAPP | 336–341 |
| A study of high frequency terrain effects in gravity field modelling | Christian VOIGT,Heiner DENKER | 342–347 |
| The utilization of global digital crustal databases in regional applications of forward gravity field modelling | D. TSOULIS,V. N. GRIGORIADIS,I.N. TZIAVOS | 348–353 |
| Recent developments in synthetic earth gravity models in view of the availability of digital terrain and crustal databases of global coverage and increased resolution | D. TSOULIS,M. KUHN | 354–359 |
| Simultaneous determination of terrain correction and local average topographic density | Gabor PAPP | 360–365 |
| Absolute gravity measurements at Ulusal Metroloji Enstitüsü | B. KARABÖCE,E. SADIKOĞLU,E. BİLGİÇ,C. KIRBAŞ,A. İ. TURAN,A. ÇOLAK | 366–370 |
| Relative campaign during the International Comparison of Absolute Gravimeters ICAG-2005 and the strategy data treatment combined with the absolute results | Zhiheng JIANG,Leonid VITUSHKIN,Matthias BECKER,Olivier FRANCIS,Philippe JOUSSET,Matthieu FERRY,François DUPONT,Sebastien DEROUSSI,Laurent METIVIER,Gwendaline PAJOT,Chiungwu LEE,Chin-Lung TSAI,Reinhard FALK,Herbert WILMES,Alexander KOPAEV,Diethard RUESS,Christian ULLRICH,Bruno MEURERS,Jan MRLINA,Vojt | 371–376 |
| Modelling the vertical gravity gradient for gravity measurements reduction | H. DUQUENNE | 377–381 |
| The Seventh International Comparison of Absolute Gravimeters ICAG-2005 at the BIPM. Organization and preliminary results | Leonid VITUSHKIN,Zhieng JIAGNG,Matthias BECKER,Olivier FRANCIS,Alessandro GERMAK,Martine AMALVICT,Roger BAYAR,Bilker Mirjam KOIVULA,Giancarlo D'AGOSTINO,Sergio DESOGUS,James FALLER,Reinhard FALK,Jacques HINDERER,Carey GAGNON,Tomas JAKOB,Evgeny KALISH,Jakub KOSTELECKY,Chiungwu LEE,Jaques LIARD,Yuriy | 382–387 |
| Quality of Lithuanian National Gravimetric Network | E. PARSELIUNAS,P. PETROSKEVICIUS | 388–392 |
| Methods of periodical errors analysis for relative gravimeters | P. LUKAVEC,M. LEDERER,O. NESVADBA | 393–397 |
| Fringe signal effect on the absolute gravimeter FG5 No. 215 | V. PALINKAS,J. KOSTELECKY | 398–400 |
| Precision gravimetry in the new Zugspitze gravity meter calibration system | J. FLURY,T. PETERS,M. SCHMEER,L. TIMMEN,H. WILMES,R. FALK | 401–406 |
| Absolute gravity measurements in Terre Adelie (Antarctica) and at Canberra (Australia) | M. AMALVICT,Y. ROGISTER,J. HINDERER,B. LUCK,H. MCQUEN,G. LUTON | 407–413 |
| Gravity and positioning control for the revision of the French gravity map and network | G. MARTELET,M. SARRAILH,N. DEBEGLIA | 414–419 |
| First order gravity network of Republic of Moldova | V. CHIRIAC,V. PANTIKIN,K. W. KRAUTERBLUTH,I. ILIES,I. CRETU | 420–423 |
| Determination of mass variation in Northern Europe from GRACE data | J. MULLER,M. NEUMANN-REDLIN,H. DENKER | 424–429 |
| GPS and gravity measurements along the western part of the North Anatolian Fault and their relation to crustal deformations | U. DOĞAN,H. DEMİREL,C. AYDIN,S. ERGİNTAV,R. ÇAKMAK,A. BELGEN,C. GERSTENECKER | 430–436 |
| Combination of GRACE, gravity and GPS data determination of long-term geoid changes in North America | E. RANGELOVA,M. G. SIDERIS | 437–442 |
| Low - degre load harmonic coefficients from combining GRACE, GPS time series and a-priori dynamics | M.J.F. JANSEN,J. KUSCHE,E. J. O. SCHRAMA | 443–448 |
| A comparison of different methods for determining the topographic - condensation mass effects at airborne altitude | A. A. MAKHLOOF,F. MULLER,K. H. ILK | 449–454 |