| Experimental shock models | Alper B. İSKİT | 71–75 |
| Comparison of EMLA and lidocaine with or without sodium bicarbonate in prevention of spinal neddle insertion pain | Ebru KELSAKA,Fuat GÜLDOĞUŞ,Binnur SARIHASAN,Şebnem TEPE | 76–79 |
| A comparison of bupivacaine, bupivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-ketamine in patient-controlled epidural analgesia | Geraslan Selcen TEKİN,İsmet TOPÇU,Arzu KEFİ,Tuna ERİNÇLER | 80–84 |
| The efficacy of epidural or intravenous tramadol combined with ropivacaine 0.75% in lumbar epidural anesthesia | Seval İZDEŞ,Elvin KESİMCİ,Saliha CAN,Orhan KANBAK | 85–89 |
| A comparison of the BIS values of propofol and dexmedetomidine in monitored anesthesia care | Canan BALCI,H. Selim KARABEKİR,İLHAMİ KURU,Gökhan MARALCAN,Banu TAYLAN | 90–94 |
| A comparison of the effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine on the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation, peroperative anesthetic requirement and recovery | Ayşegül KORDAN,DUDU BERRİN GÜNAYDIN | 95–102 |
| The effects of lactated ringer and HES solutions in differing combinations to prevent hypotension due to spinal anesthesia | Şaziye ŞAHİN,Filiz SARI,Alpaslan APAN,Hülya BAŞAR | 103–108 |
| The efficacy of rocuronium-remifentanil combination in rapid sequence anesthesia induction | Zekeriyya ALANOĞLU,Ali Abbas YILMAZ,Nilgün ŞAHİN,Yeşim ATEŞ,FİLİZ TÜZÜNER | 109–115 |
| Simultaneous use of continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration and activated protein C for treatment of septic shock and acute renal failure (case report) | Müslüm ÇİÇEK,ENDER GEDİK,Zafer DOĞAN,Nurçin GÜLHAŞ,M. Özcan ERSOY | 116–119 |
| A complication of endotracheal intubation: Laryngeal granuloma (Report on 3 cases) | MESUT ŞENER,İsmail YILMAZ,Cüneyt YILMAZER,Aslı DÖNMEZ,Levent ÖZLÜOĞLU,Gülnaz ARSLAN | 120–124 |
| Asymptomatic vertebral abnormalities and the safety of neuroaxial blocks (Case report) | Mehmet CESUR,Hacı Ahmet ALICI | 125–126 |