SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İlköğretim Online / 2010 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

Examination of Human Figure Drawings by Gifted and Normally Developed Children at Preschool Period

Okul Öncesi Dönemde Üstün Yetenekli ve Normal Gelişim Gösteren Çocukların İnsan Figürü Çizimleri

H.elif DAĞLIOĞLU
Fatma ÇALIŞANDEMİR
Meral ALEMDAR
Saniye Bencik KANGAL
Pages
31–43
Publication Date
2010-06-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that gifted children, particularly girls, produced more developed and detailed drawings in both age groups, and that all 5 year olds produced both qualitatively and quantitatively more advanced drawings when compared to 4 year olds.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to examine the drawing stages and characteristics of 4-5 year old normally developing and gifted children.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study sample included a total of 60 4 and 5 year old children, with 20 of them previously identified as gifted and the remaining 40 displaying normal development.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that gifted children, particularly girls, produced more developed and detailed drawings in both age groups, and that all 5 year olds produced both qualitatively and quantitatively more advanced drawings when compared to 4 year olds.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Okul Öncesi dönem çocukları · üstün yetenekli çocuklar · insan figürü çizimleri

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the drawing stages and characteristics of 4-5 year old normally developing and gifted children. Childrens human figure drawings (HFD) were assessed accroding to Koppitz’s HFD criteria. The study sample included a total of 60 4 and 5 year old children, with 20 of them previously identified as gifted and the remaining 40 displaying normal development. The results showed that gifted children, particularly girls, produced more developed and detailed drawings in both age groups, and that all 5 year olds produced both qualitatively and quantitatively more advanced drawings when compared to 4 year olds. Additionally, 4 year old gifted children, especially girls, had drawing skills almost equal to those of 5 year olds.

Özet

Bu araştırma, 4-5 yaş grubu normal gelişim gösteren çocuklarla karşılaştırılmıştıraşamalarının ve resim özelliklerinin birlikte. Çocukların figürü çizimleri (FÇ) Koppitz'in FÇ kriterleri çerçevesinde yapılmıştır. Örneklemi, 4-5 yaş 20'si daha fazla tanılanmış üstün yetenekli çocuk ile 40'ı normal gelişim 60 yaşındaki çocuk. Araştırmada her iki yaşımda da üstün yetenekli yapabilir daha fazlası için tıklayınız. 4 ısıraya göre çizim becerilerinde hem güzelliksel hem de niceliksel birlikte olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. 4 tane baş grubunun üstün yetenekli kız tarafından çizilmesi becerilerinin kendini 5 yaş düzeyinde olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DAĞLIOĞLU, H., ÇALIŞANDEMİR, F., ALEMDAR, M., KANGAL, S. B. (2010). Examination of Human Figure Drawings by Gifted and Normally Developed Children at Preschool Period. İlköğretim Online, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 31–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/999212

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Bayhan, P. and Artan,. (2005). Child Development and Education [Çocuk Geli(imi ve E)itimi], Morpa YayQncQlQk, stanbul. Bensur, B.J., Eliot, J., & Hedge, L. (1997). Cognitive Correlates of Complexity of Children’s Drawings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85, 1079-1089. Case R., & Okamoto, Y. (1996). The Role of Central Conceptual Structures in The Development of Children’s Thought. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 246 (61), 1-2.
  2. Cherney, I.D., Seiwert, C.S., Dickey, T.M.,Flichtbeil, J.D. (2006). Children’s Drawings: A Mirror to Their Minds.Educational Psyschology.vol:26,No:1,February.pp127-142. Cox, M.V. (1985). One Object Behind Another: Young Children’s Use of Array-Specific or Viewspecific Representation. In N.H. Freeman & M.V. Cox (Eds.), Visual Order: The Nature and Development of Pictorial Representation ( pp. 188-200). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Cox, M.V. (1992). Children’s Drawings. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin. Cox, M.V. (1993). Children’s Drawings of the Human Figure. Hove, UK: Erlbaum. Da lQo lu H. E. (1995). Identify the Gifted Children trough the Grades 2-5 in the Elementary Schools”,[ lkokul 2.-5. SQnQflara Devam Eden Çocuklar ArasQndan Üstün Yetenekli OlanlarQn Belirlenmesi. YayQmlanmamQR Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sa lQk Bilimleri Enstitüsü Ankara.
  4. Freeman, N.H. (1980). Strategies of Representation in Young Children: Analysis of Spatial Skills and Drawing Processes. London: Academic Press. Golomb,C. (2004) The Child’s Creation of A Pictorial World. Mahwah,Nj:Lawrence Erlbaum Assosiates. Hammer, E.F. (1997). Advances in Projective Drawing 6nterpretation. Springfield, IL: Thomas. Harris, D. B. (1963). Children’s Drawings As Measures of 6ntellectual Maturity:Revision And Extension of The Goodenough Draw-a-Man Test. New York: Harcourt, Brace And World, Inc. Hotulinen,R. ve Schofield N.,(2003). “Identified Preschool Potential Giftedness and Relation to Academic Achivement and Self-Concept at The End of Finnish Comprehensive School”. High Ability Studies vol. 14, no:1 June KQrQRo lu, O.T. (2002). Education in Art [Sanatta E)itim]. Ankara, Pegem A YayQncQlQk, 2. BaskQ. Knoff, H. M., & Prout, H. T. (1985). Kinetic Drawing System for Family and School: A Handbook. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services. Kokot, S. (1999). “Help Our Child is Gifted” Revision Edition.
  5. Readford House Publication, Henkos Printers (Pty) Ltd. Republic of South Africa. Koppitz, E. M. ( 1968). Psychogical Evaluatio