SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İlköğretim Online / 2013 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

Students\' Views on Peer Assessment: A case study

Öğrenci Görüşleriyle Akran Değerlendirme: Bir Örnek Uygulama

Ramazan DEMİR
Esra BOZKURT
Pages
241–253
Publication Date
2013-06-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the result of peer assessment, it is possible to claim that successful groups have more positive thoughts than others.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, a special peer assessment technique was applied for 5th grade students in relation to the unit “Electricity in our life” in the Science and Technology course.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The pattern of research is a case study. 30 students at the 5th grade of primary school in the district Selcuklu form the sample group of the research.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the result of peer assessment, it is possible to claim that successful groups have more positive thoughts than others.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Akran değerlendirme · öğrenci görüşleri · yaşamımızdaki elektrik

Abstract

In this study, a special peer assessment technique was applied for 5th grade students in relation to the unit “Electricity in our life” in the Science and Technology course. According to this activity, it was aimed to determine the views of students associated with peer assessment. It was also aimed to study the reflection of students’ success which they acquired as a result of peer assessment. In addition, the views of a science teacher and a class teacher who participated as observers were received. The research design is based on the method of qualitative research. The pattern of research is a case study. 30 students at the 5th grade of primary school in the district Selcuklu form the sample group of the research. The self-structured interview method was used to get students’ view and the unstructured interview method was used to receive teachers’ opinions. It was established that students have positive thoughts about peer assessment. Based on the result of peer assessment, it is possible to claim that successful groups have more positive thoughts than others.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, ilköğretim 5. sınıf öğrencilerine Fen ve Teknoloji dersi “Yaşamımızdaki Elektrik” ünitesine yönelik örnek bir akran değerlendirme etkinliği yaptırılmıştır. Bu ders etkinliğinden yola çıkarak öğrencilerin akran değerlendirmesine yönelik görüşlerinin belirlenmesi ve öğrencilerin akran değerlendirme sonucu edindikleri başarı derecelerinin görüşlerine yansıma durumunun araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Ayrıca etkinliğin uygulanması esnasında gözlemci olarak katılan bir fen ve teknoloji ve bir sınıf öğretmeninin de akran değerlendirmeye yönelik görüşleri alınmıştır. Araştırmanın veri toplama, örneklem seçimi ve veri analizi basamaklarının tümü nitel araştırma yöntemiyle tasarlanmıştır. Araştırmanın deseni; durum (örnek olay) çalışmasıdır. Araştırmanın örneklemi; amaçlı örnekleme yöntemlerinden kolay ulaşılabilir örneklem tekniğiyle seçilmiştir. Konya ili Selçuklu ilçesinde ilköğretim 5. sınıfa devam eden 30 öğrenci araştırmanın örneklem grubunu oluşturmaktadır. Öğrencilerin görüşlerine yönelik verilerin toplanmasında yarı yapılandırılmış, öğretmenlerin görüşlerinin alınmasında ise yapılandırılmamış görüşme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunda yer alan ilköğretim 5. sınıf öğrencileri akran değerlendirmesine yönelik olumlu görüşlere sahiptir. Akran değerlendirmesi sonucu başarılı olan gruplar, diğerlerinden daha olumlu görüşlere sahip olmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, R., BOZKURT, E. (2013). Students\' Views on Peer Assessment: A case study. İlköğretim Online, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 241–253. https://ajindex.com/articles/998953

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ballantyne, R., Hugnes, K., & Mylonas, A. (2002). Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 427-441.
  2. Berg, B.L. (1998). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Black, P.J., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in education: principles. Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
  3. Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1997). Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 233–240.
  4. Chou, C., & Tsai, C.C. (2002). Developing web-based curricula: Issues and challenges. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(6), 623-636
  5. Creswell, J.W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. Davies, P. (2002). Using Student Reflective Self-Assessment for Awarding Degree Classifications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(4), 307-319
  6. Diveharan, S., & Atputhasamy, L. (2002). An attempt to enhance the quality of cooperative learning through peer assesment. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 3 (2), 72-85.
  7. Dochy, F., & McDowell, L. (1998). Introduction assesment as a tool for learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 23 (4), 279-298.
  8. Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer, and co-assessment in higher education: a review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–50.
  9. Ellington, H. (1997). Making effective use of peer and self assessment. The Robert Gordon University. Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 175–187.
  10. Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: a metaanalysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70, 287-322.
  11. Gay, L.R. (1996). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. (5th Ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Haaga, D.A. (1993). Peer review of term papers in graduate psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology, 20, 28-32.
  12. Hodges, W.J., Lamb, P., Brown, M.H., & Foy, D.S. (2005).
  13. Assessment For All. Science Scope, January, 43-44.
  14. Karabay Koçyiğit, B., & Gündüz Sefer, D. (2004). Süreç değerlendirme yaklaşımı ile yazma becerilerinin geliştirilmesine yönelik bir çalışma: Benim öykülerim. XIII.