Journals / İlköğretim Online / 2015 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3

-

Öğrenme Yörüngeleri ve Matematik Eğitimindeki Yeri

Pages
961–973
Publication Date
2015-08-07
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is suggested to conduct different studies at all levels about learning orbits

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There are several studies related to learning on the field of education, but in the recent times, they have focused on examining how students think and how their thinking becomes more complicated in time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The conception of learning trajectories consisting of mathematical purpose, progressive improvements specific to the domain of child, appropriate activities for the different levels of these improvements has emerged in this review process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is suggested to conduct different studies at all levels about learning orbits
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:öğrenme yörüngesi · matematik eğitimi · öğrenme

Abstract

There are several studies related to learning on the field of education, but in the recent times, they have focused on examining how students think and how their thinking becomes more complicated in time. The conception of learning trajectories consisting of mathematical purpose, progressive improvements specific to the domain of child, appropriate activities for the different levels of these improvements has emerged in this review process. Various definitions of learning trajectories have been put forward by different researchers, and it has been observed that the trajectories are utilized in the processes of learning and teaching mathematics, and evaluating the subject learned. Therefore, the aim of this compilation study is primarily to introduce the conception of learning trajectories to national literature, to discuss this subject by using definitions of learning trajectories by various researchers, and to address the fields utilizing mathematics education briefly. It is suggested to conduct different studies at all levels about learning orbits

Özet

Eğitim alanında öğrenme üzerine pek çok çalışma yapılmış olmakla birlikte son zamanlarda öğrenmeyle ilgili yapılan çalışmalar, öğrencilerin nasıl düşündüğünü ve düşüncelerinin zaman içerisinde nasıl karmaşık hale geldiğini inceleme üzerine odaklanmışlardır. Bu inceleme sürecinde, bireyin belirli bir alana özgü gelişimsel ilerlemeleri ve bu ilerlemelerin farklı seviyelerde uygun aktivitelerin toplamından oluşan öğrenme yörüngesi kavramı ortaya çıkmıştır. Öğrenme yörüngesi ile ilgili araştırmacılar tarafından çeşitli tanımlar yapılmıştır. Bu tanımlardan hareketle öğrenme yörüngesinin matematikte öğrenme, öğretme ve öğrenileni değerlendirme süreçlerinde kullanıldığı görülmüştür. Bu derleme çalışmasının amacı, öncelikle öğrenme yörüngesi kavramını ulusal literatüre kazandırmak, beraberinde öğrenme yörüngelerinin ne olduğuna ilişkin çeşitli araştırmacıların tanımlarından faydalanarak bu konu üzerinde tartışmak ve matematik eğitiminde kullanım alanlarına kısaca değinmektir. Öğrenme yörüngeleriyle ilgili olarak, her düzeyde matematik konuları kapsamında çeşitli çalışmaların yapılması önerilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DÜNDAR, S., GÜNDÜZ, N. (2015). -. İlköğretim Online, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3, 961–973. https://ajindex.com/articles/998807

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–406.
  2. Barrett, J. E., & Clements, D. H. (2003). Quantifying path length: Fourth-grade children's developing abstractions for linear measurement. Cognition and Instruction, 21(4), 475-520.
  3. Barrett, J. E., Clements, D. H., Klanderman, D., Pennisi, S., & Polaki, M. V. (2006). Students' coordination of geometric reasoning and measuring strategies on a fixed perimeter task: Developing mathematical understanding of linear measurement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(3), 187-221.
  4. Battista, M. T. (2003). Levels of sophistication in elementary students' reasoning about length. Paper presented at the 27th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Honolulu, HI. Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 843- 908). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc. Brown, A.L. & Campione, J.C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289-325).
  5. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Brown, C. S., Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2007). Thinking about learning trajectories in preschool. Teaching Children Mathematics, 14, 178-181.
  6. Bumen, N. T. (2007). Effects of the original versus revised Bloom’s Taxnomy on lesson planning skills: A Turkish study among pre-service teachers. Review of Education, 53(4), 439–455.
  7. Case, R., & Griffin, S. (1990). Child cognitive development: The role of central conceptual structures in the development of scientific and social thought. In E. A. Hauert (Ed.), Developmental psychology: Cognitive, perceptuo-motor, and neurological perspectives (pp. 193-230). North-Holland: Elsevier Catley, K., Lehrer, R., & Reiser, B. (2004). Tracing a prospective learning progression for developing understanding of evolution. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  8. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2004). Learning trajectories in mathematics education. Mathematical thinking and learning, 6(2), 81-89. Clements D.H., & Sarama J. (2009) Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. New York, NY: Routledge. Clements, D. H., Wilson, D. C., & Sarama, J. (2004). Young