Journals / ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources / 2009 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3

The Effect of Competition and Computer Aided Manufacturing on the Use of Multiple Performance Measures:An Emprical Study

Pages
65–86
Publication Date
2009-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that there is a linear relationship between the use of a multidimensional performance measurement system directed at performance evaluation and businesses facing high competition and making greater use of a computer aided manufacturing system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Many studies have investigated the effects of increasing competition, improving production technologies, and developing management systems on the use of multiple performance measures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper is an empirical study on the use of multiple performance measures in Turkey, which is classified as a developing country.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that there is a linear relationship between the use of a multidimensional performance measurement system directed at performance evaluation and businesses facing high competition and making greater use of a computer aided manufacturing system.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Çoklu Performans Ölçüleri · Bilgisayar Destekli Üretim · Rekabet

Abstract

Many studies have investigated the effects of increasing competition, improving production technologies, and developing management systems on the use of multiple performance measures. However, the majority of these studies examine businesses in developed countries. This paper is an empirical study on the use of multiple performance measures in Turkey, which is classified as a developing country. With this purpose in mind, data from 122 manufacturing businesses, which were among the top 500 businesses in Turkey according to the 2005 statistics, were gathered, classified, and tested to determine whether there was any significant relationship (and to what degree) between the density of competition in the market, the employment of computer-aided production tools and techniques in production, and the application of performance systems relying on multiple performance criteria. The results show that there is a linear relationship between the use of a multidimensional performance measurement system directed at performance evaluation and businesses facing high competition and making greater use of a computer aided manufacturing system.

Özet

Rekabet, üretim teknolojileri ve yönetim sistemlerinin gelişimi gibi faktörlerin çoklu performans ölçüm sistemi kullanımına etkileri, pek çok çalışmaya konu olmuştur. Ancak çalışmaların büyük çoğunluğu gelişmiş ülkelerde faaliyet gösteren işletmeler üzerinedir. Bu çalışma özellikle gelişmekte olan ülkeler kategorisine dahil edilebilecek olan Türkiye’deki üretim işletmelerinde çoklu performans ölçümü kullanımına yönelik ampirik bir çalışmadır. Çalışmada, 2005 yılında Türkiye’de ilk beşyüz büyük işletme içerisinde yer alan 122 imalat işletmesinden toplanan veriler kullanılarak, çoklu performans ölçüm sisteminin pazar rekabet yoğunluğu ve bilgisayar destekli üretim sistemiyle nasıl bir ilişki içerisinde olduğu ampirik olarak incelenmektedir. Sonuçlar, performans değerlendirmeye yönelik çoklu ölçüm sisteminin kullanımı ile yüksek Pazar konumuna sahip ve bilgisayar destekli üretim sisteminin kullanımına önem veren işletmeler arasında doğrusal bir ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

LAZOL, P. İ., EKER, D. (2009). The Effect of Competition and Computer Aided Manufacturing on the Use of Multiple Performance Measures:An Emprical Study. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3, 65–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/998115

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abernethy, S.M. & Lillis, A.M. (1995). The Impact of Manufacturing Flexibility on Management Control System Design, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(4), 241-258.
  2. Albright, T. (2006). Managerial Accounting and Continuous Improvement Initiati- ves: A Retrospective and Framework, Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. XVIII, Number:2, 157-174.
  3. Allott, A. (2000). Some Academics Say Ma- nagement Accounting Has Not Chan- ged in The Last 60 Years; Others Say It Has—Hugely Who’s Right, Asks Anita Allott?, Management Accounting: Ma- gazine For Chartered Management Ac- countants, Vol.78, Issue.7, 54-56.
  4. Atkinson, A.A. & Kaplan, R.S. & Young, S. M. (2004), Management Accounting. Fourth Edition,
  5. New Jersey, Pearson Prentice Hall. Banker, R.D. & Potter, G. & Schroeder, R.G.(1993). Reporting Manufacturing Performance Measures To Workers: An Empirical Study”, JMAR, Volume Five, 33-55.
  6. Bruggeman, W. & Slagmulder, R. (1995). The Impact of Technological Change on Ma- nagement Accounting, Management Accounting Research, 6, 241-252.
  7. Bukh, N.D. & Gormsen, P. & Mols, N.P. Ac- counting For The Financial Service Cus- tomer in Denmark: Activity- Based Costing Practices, www.bettermanage- ment.com Cavalluzzoa, K.S. & Ittner, C.D. (2004). Im- plementing Performance Measurement Innovations: Evidence From Govern- ment, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 243-267.
  8. Cheatham, C.B. & Cheatham, L.R. (1996). Re- designing Cost Systems: Is Standard Costıng Obsolete?, Accounting Hori- zons, Vol. 10, Issue 4. Chenhall, R.H. (1997). Reliance on Manufac- turing Performance Measures, Total Quality Management and Organizatio- nal Performance, Management Accoun- ting Research,Vol.8, 187-206.
  9. Chenhall, R.H. & Morris, D. (1986).
  10. The Im- pact of Structure, Environment, and In- terdependence on The Perceived Usefulness of Management Accounting Systems, The Accounting Review, Vol.LXI, No.1, 16-35.
  11. Davis, S. & Albright, T. (2004). An Investi- gation of The Effect of Balanced Score- card Implementation on Financial Performance, Management Accounting Research, 15, 135-153.
  12. Dilber, M. & Bayyurt, N. & Zaim, S. & Tarim, M. (2005). Critical Factors of Total Qua- lity Management and Its Effect on Per- formance in Health Care Industry: A Turkish Experience”, Problems and Perspectives in Management, 4, 220. Duncan, R.B. (1972). Characteristics of Orga- nizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty, Adminis- trative Science Quarterly, September, 313-327.
  13. Eker, M. (2004). Faaliyet Ta