Journals / ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources / 2015 / Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2

Bankacılık Sektörü Kredi Hacmi Genişlemesinin İşsizlik Üzerindeki Etkileri: Çoklu Yapısal Kırılmalı Eştümleşme Analizi

Pages
109–129
Publication Date
2015-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analysis it was determined that credit volume increases have got a reducing effect on unemployment in Turkey

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study effects of banking sector total credit volume expansion on unemployment were analysed separately by means of unit root test with multiple structural breaks of Carrion-i-Silvestre et al. (2009), cointegration test with multiple structural breaks of Maki (2012) and dynamic ordinary least square method for 1986-2013; 2000:Q1-2013:Q2 and 2005:M01-2013:M05 period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study effects of banking sector total credit volume expansion on unemployment were analysed separately by means of unit root test with multiple structural breaks of Carrion-i-Silvestre et al. (2009), cointegration test with multiple structural breaks of Maki (2012) and dynamic ordinary least square method for 1986-2013; 2000:Q1-2013:Q2 and 2005:M01-2013:M05 period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analysis it was determined that credit volume increases have got a reducing effect on unemployment in Turkey
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kredi Hacmi · İşsizlik · Çoklu Yapısal Kırılmalı Birim Kök ve Eştümleşme

Abstract

In this study effects of banking sector total credit volume expansion on unemployment were analysed separately by means of unit root test with multiple structural breaks of Carrion-i-Silvestre et al. (2009), cointegration test with multiple structural breaks of Maki (2012) and dynamic ordinary least square method for 1986-2013; 2000:Q1-2013:Q2 and 2005:M01-2013:M05 period. As a result of the analysis it was determined that credit volume increases have got a reducing effect on unemployment in Turkey

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de bankacılık sektörü toplam kredi hacminin işsizlik üzerindeki etkileri, Carrion-i-Silvestre vd. (2009) çoklu yapısal kırılmalı birim kök testi, Maki (2012) çoklu yapısal kırılmalı eştümleşme testi ve dinamik en küçük kareler yöntemi yardımıyla, 1986-2013; 2000:Q1-2013:Q2 ve 2005:M01-2013:M05 dönemleri için ayrı ayrı analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda, Türkiye’de kredi hacmindeki artışların, işsizlik oranını azaltıcı etkiye sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖÇER, Y. D. D. İ. (2015). Bankacılık Sektörü Kredi Hacmi Genişlemesinin İşsizlik Üzerindeki Etkileri: Çoklu Yapısal Kırılmalı Eştümleşme Analizi. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2, 109–129. https://ajindex.com/articles/997954

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Açıkgöz, Ş. Balcılar, M. ve Saraçoğlu, B. (2012). Openness and Financial Development: Time Series Evidence for Turkey. International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance. 12(4), 172 - 201. Aslan, Ö. ve Küçükaksoy, I. (2006). Finansal Gelişme ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Türkiye Ekonomisi Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Uygulama. Ekonometri ve İstatistik. 4, 12- 8. Aizenman, J., Pinto, B. ve Sushko, V. (2013). Financial Sector Ups and Downs and the Real Sector in the Open Economy: Up by the Stairs, Down by the Parachute. BIS WP, No: 411. Bai, J. ve Perron, P. (2003). Computation and Analysis of Multiple Structural Change Models. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 18, 1-22. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2011). The Transmission Channels Between the Financial and Real Sectors: A Critical Survey of the Literature. WP. No: 18. BDDK. (2012).
  2. Finansal Piyasalar Raporu, Aralık, Ankara.
  3. Benmelech, E., Bergman, N.K. ve Seru, A. (2011).
  4. Finance and Unemployment, NBER Working Paper. No: 17144. Berk, J.M. (1998). Monetary Transmission: What Do We Know and How Can We Use It? Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review. 51 (205), 145-170.
  5. Bernanke, B.S. ve Blinder, A.S. (1992). The Federal Funds Rate and the Channels of Monetary Transmission. The American Economic Review. 82(4), 901-921.
  6. Bernanke, B. (1993).
  7. Credit in the Macroeconomy, Federal Reserve Bank of Newyork Quarterly Review. 18(1), 50-70.
  8. Bernanke, B.S. ve Gertler, M. (1995). Inside the Black Box: The Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 9(4), 27-48.
  9. Bertrand, M., Schoar, A. ve Thesmar, D. (2007). Banking Deregulation and Industry Structure: Evidence from the French Banking Reforms of 1985. Journal of Finance. 62(2), 597-628.
  10. Carrion-i-Silvestre, J.L. ve Sanso, A. (2006). Testing the Null of Cointegration with Structural Breaks. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 68(5), 623-646.
  11. Carrion-i-Silvestre, J.L., Kim, D ve Perron, P. (2009). GLS-Based Unit Root Tests with Multiple Structural Breaks Under Both the Null and the Alternative Hypotheses. Econometric Theory. 25, 1754-1792.
  12. Castillo, P.J. (2009). Unemployment Threat of the Financial Crisis. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review. 9(1), 41-46.
  13. Cecchetti, S.G. (1999).
  14. Legal Structure, Financial Structure, and Monetary Policy Transmission Mechanism. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review. 9-28.
  15. Cengiz, V. ve Duman, M. (2008). Türkiye’de Banka Kredi Kanalının Önemi Üzerine Etki Tepki Fonksi