Journals / International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies / 2011 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

PROFESSIONAL CONTENTMENT IN A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY: A CASE STUDY

Pages
143–151
Publication Date
2011-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper will present the findings of the study which aimed to determine the level of satisfaction based on factors such as pay, promotion, supervision, fringe benefit, contingent reward, operating condition, coworkers, nature of work and communication

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There have been many studies conducted to determine variables that affect professional contentment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Several of these studies found that a larger percentage of unemployed and employed personnel expressed dissatisfaction with their work commitment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper will present the findings of the study which aimed to determine the level of satisfaction based on factors such as pay, promotion, supervision, fringe benefit, contingent reward, operating condition, coworkers, nature of work and communication
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Professional · Contentment · Organization

Abstract

There have been many studies conducted to determine variables that affect professional contentment. Some of these studies have looked at factors such as organizational involvement and commitment to organizations. Several of these studies found that a larger percentage of unemployed and employed personnel expressed dissatisfaction with their work commitment. The implications of those studies suggested that unemployed could reflect underlying adjustment disorders which have an impact on someone’s potential for successful employment. However, for those who are contented with their performance, in the long run these workers would have a higher gratification. They would give more attention on the quality of their work, more committed to the organization, have a higher retention rates, and would be more productive. Reflecting on these findings and how severe this issue may render, this study is conducted to identify the level of professional satisfaction of the academic staffs in a research university in the southern part of Malaysia. This paper will present the findings of the study which aimed to determine the level of satisfaction based on factors such as pay, promotion, supervision, fringe benefit, contingent reward, operating condition, coworkers, nature of work and communication

🔖

Cite This Article

Rahman, H. A., Saat, M. M., Rajab, A. (2011). PROFESSIONAL CONTENTMENT IN A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY: A CASE STUDY. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 143–151. https://ajindex.com/articles/997099

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Alf Crossman and Bassem Abou-Zaki (2003), “Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance of Lebanese Banking Staff”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 368-376.
  2. Alf Crossman and Penelope Harris (2006), “Job Satisfaction of Secondary School Teachers”, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, Vol. 34, No. 10, pp. 29-46.
  3. Athonia Adenike (2011), “Organizational Climate as a Predictor of Employee Job Satisfaction: Evidence From Covenant University”, Business Intelligence Journal, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 151-165.
  4. Edwin A. Locke (1968), “Toward A Theory of Task Motivation and Incentives”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 3, pp. 157-189.
  5. Edwin A. Locke (1976). The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction (in M.D. Dunnette -Ed., Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology), Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 1297-1349. Fauziah Noordin and Kamaruzaman Jusoff (2009), “Levels of Job Satisfaction Amongst Malaysian Academic Staff”, Asian Social Science, Vol. 5, No. 5. Frederick Herzberg, Bernard Mausner and Barbara B. Snyderman (1959),
  6. The Motivation to Work, New York: John Wiley and Sons. Frederick P. Morgeson and Humprey Stephen E. (2002), “The Work design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and Validating a Comprehensive Measure for Assessing Job Design and The Nature of Work”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 91, No. 6, pp. 1321. Gary F. Koeske, S. A. Kirk, R. D. Koeske and M. B. Rauktis (1994), “Measuring the Monday blues: validation of a job satisfaction scale for the human services”, Social Work Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 27-35.
  7. Heng Lee Kiang, Hana Hamidi and Rusli Ahmad (2011), “Job Satisfaction and Job Performance: The Moderating Role of Gender Differences”, International Conference Human Resource Development, pp. 310-323. J. Richard Hackman and Greg R. Oldman (1976), “Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol.16, No.2, pp. 250-279.
  8. Michael J. Syptak, Marsland David W. and Ulmer, Deborah (1999), Job Satisfaction: Putting Theory Into Practice. American Academy of Family Physicians. http://www.Aafp.Org/Fpm/991000fm/26.Html, [Accessed 9.3.2009]
  9. Mohd Johan, R. (2004), Tahap Komitmen Pekerja Terhadap Organisasi dan Hubungannya Dengan Ganjaran: Satu Kajian di Kalangan Kakitangan Pembantu Tadbir di Majlis Perbandaran Muar. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Noor Harun Abdul Karim (2008), “Investigating the Correlates and Predictors of Job Satisfaction among Malaysia