Journals / International Journal of Educational Methodology / 2019 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

A Research on the Characteristics of the Inspiring Teacher

Pages
1–18
Publication Date
2019-02-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, in this study the characteristics inspiring teachers were specified according to opinions of teacher candidates and presented to be o model for teacher candidates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it was aimed to find out the characteristics of inspiring teachers who inspired teacher candidates to do teaching profession properly.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results of analysis have demonstrated that the items loaded on four factors, which reflect inspiring teacher characteristics as “teacher communication”, “personal characteristics”, “professional development” and “supporting students in different ways”.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, in this study the characteristics inspiring teachers were specified according to opinions of teacher candidates and presented to be o model for teacher candidates.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Education · teaching · inspiring teacher

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to find out the characteristics of inspiring teachers who inspired teacher candidates to do teaching profession properly. In the study, “An Exploratory Sequential Design” a mixed method where qualitative and quantitative approaches are used concomitantly, was employed to determine the inspiring teacher characteristics. In this design, two steps were respectively followed by the researcher. In the first step grounded theory research design as a qualitative research design was used and in the second step survey research model as a quantitative research design was used. Inspiring Teacher Scale (ITS) was developed by the researchers to collect the data. In the second phase, the study group was extended to continue the quantitative studies. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used first to analyze the data. The results of analysis have demonstrated that the items loaded on four factors, which reflect inspiring teacher characteristics as “teacher communication”, “personal characteristics”, “professional development” and “supporting students in different ways”. Findings suggest that ITS, which has four-factor structures with 36 items, can be suggested as a valid and reliable instrument to determine the characteristics of inspiring teacher. Therefore, in this study the characteristics inspiring teachers were specified according to opinions of teacher candidates and presented to be o model for teacher candidates.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURHAN, N. S., PARLAKYİLDİZ, B., ARSLAN, N., GOCEN, G., BİNGO, T. Y. (2019). A Research on the Characteristics of the Inspiring Teacher. International Journal of Educational Methodology, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 1–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/995118

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Beane, J. A., & Brodhagen, B. L. (2001). Teaching in middle schools. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (4th ed., pp. 1157-1174). Washington: American Educational Research Association. Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419-456.
  2. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
  3. Bilen, M. (1996). Plandan uygulamaya ogretim [Plan to practice]. Ankara:
  4. Aydan Publishing. Buyukozturk, S. (2007). Deneysel Desenler [Experimental patterns]. Ankara:
  5. Pegem Publishing. Buyukozturk, S. (2012). Sosyal bilimler icin veri analizi el kitabi [Data analysis handbook for social sciences]. Ankara:
  6. Pegem Publishing. Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162).
  7. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling, 14(3), 464-504.
  8. Creswell, J. W., Fetters, M. D., & Ivankova, N. V. (2004). Designing a mix methods study in primary care. Annals of Family Medicine, 2(1), 7-12.
  9. Celikten, M., Sanal, M., & Yeni, Y. (2005). Ogretmenlik meslegi ve ozellikleri [Teaching profession and features]. Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 19(2), 207-237.
  10. Demirel, O. (1999). Planlamadan degerlendirmeye ogretme sanati [The art of teaching from planning to evaluation]. Ankara:
  11. Pegem Publishing. Dowling, M. (1988). Education 3 to 5: A teachers’ handbook (pp.108-120). London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd. Erturk, S. (1998). Egitimde program gelistirme [Curriculum development in education] (10th Edition). Ankara:
  12. Meteksan. Fenstermacher, G. D., & Soltis, J. F. (1998). Approaches to teaching (3rd Edition ). New York: Teachers College Press.
  13. Freeman, W., & Scheidecker, D. (2009). Becoming a legendary teacher to instruct and inspire. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Gao, L., & Watkins, D. A. (2001). Identifying and assessing the conceptions of teaching of secondary school physics teachers in China. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 443-469.
  14. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1965). Awareness of dying. Chicago: Aldine. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine. Gurkan, T. (1986). Ogretmen tutumlarin