SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Avrupa’da Birliğin Yolu Türkiye’den Geçer

Hakan SAMUR
Pages
145–167
Publication Date
2010-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This is actually necessary if the EU is to reach its ideal of building a fully political union founded on a democratic and pluralistic framework

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:For the European Union, Turkey’s full membership constitutes the basis of many heated arguments and has become a topic that is continually deferred to a later date.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Perhaps the most frequently repeated reason given for the stand against Turkey’s accession by both the leading elite of the Union and member states, and the EU community, is that Turkey’s socio-cultural status significantly differs from that of the EU.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This is actually necessary if the EU is to reach its ideal of building a fully political union founded on a democratic and pluralistic framework
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Avrupa’nın Ötekisi · Avrupa Birliği · Türkiye

Abstract

For the European Union, Turkey’s full membership constitutes the basis of many heated arguments and has become a topic that is continually deferred to a later date. Perhaps the most frequently repeated reason given for the stand against Turkey’s accession by both the leading elite of the Union and member states, and the EU community, is that Turkey’s socio-cultural status significantly differs from that of the EU. This reasoning is also fed by a historical background that made Turks the most noteworthy Other for Europe for centuries. The present study attempts to show that cultural differences resulting especially from religion and the role Turkey has played as the most important historical Other, in fact constitute a principal point that the EU needs to take into account in terms of accepting Turkey’s membership bid. This is actually necessary if the EU is to reach its ideal of building a fully political union founded on a democratic and pluralistic framework

Özet

Türkiye’nin tam üyeliği, Avrupa Birliği açısından en hararetli tartışmaların yaşandığı ve devamlı sürüncemede tutulan bir konu niteliğindedir. Gerek Birliğin ve üye ülkelerin yönetici elitleri açısından gerekse AB toplumu açısından Türkiye’nin üyeliğine karşı oluşun belki de en sık tekrarlanan gerekçesi Türkiye’nin sosyo-kültürel anlamda AB’den oldukça farklı bir konumda bulunmasıdır. Söz konusu gerekçe, Türkleri asırlarca Avrupa’nın en önemli Ötekisi yapan tarihsel bir arka planla da beslenmektedir. Bu çalışmanın ortaya koymaya çalıştığı husus, özellikle dinden kaynaklanan kültürel farklılıklarının ve en önemli tarihsel Ötekisi rolünün bulunmasının aslında Türkiye’yi üyeliğe kabul etme açısından, AB’nin dikkate alması gereken en önemli unsur olduğudur. Hatta Birliğin demokratik ve çoğulcu bir çerçevede tam anlamıyla siyasi bir birlik oluşturması yönündeki idealine ulaşabilmesi için bu zorunludur

🔖

Cite This Article

SAMUR, H. (2010). Avrupa’da Birliğin Yolu Türkiye’den Geçer. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 145–167. https://ajindex.com/articles/9946

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Emanuel ADLER, “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics”, European Journal of International Relations, Cilt 3, No 3, 1997, s. 319-363.
  2. Attila AGH, The Politics of Central Europe, London, Sage, 1998. Deniz ALTINBAŞ, “Türkiye-AB İlişkilerinde Sarkozy Fransası Faktörü”, Mayıs 2008, (18 Aralık 2009). Talal ASAD, “Muslims and European Identity”, Elizabeth Hallam ve Brian V. Street (der.), Cultural Encounters- Representing ‘Otherness’, London, Routledge, 2001, s. 16. Natalya BALYTSKA, “Public Opinion in Turkey And EU Member States on the Turkish EU Membership”, Cross-Regional Discipline Meeting of AFP Fellows, 22-28 Şubat 2006, s. 16. Paloma Gay BLASCO, “This is not a Place for Civilised People: Isolation, Enforced Education and Resistance Among Spanish Gypsies”, Carolyn Strange ve Alison Bashford (der.), Isolation: Places and Practices of Exclusion, London, Routledge, 2003, ss. 208-221. Stefan BERGER, “Representations of the Past: The Writing of National Histories in Europe”, Debatte, Cilt. 12, No. 1, 2004, ss. 73-96.
  3. Robert BİDELEUX and Ian JEFFRİES, A History of Eastern Europe, London, Routledge, 1998.
  4. Yücel BULUT, Oryantalizmin Kısa Tarihi, 2. Basım, İstanbul, Küre Yayınları, 2006. Jose CASANOVA, “Religion, European Secular Identities and European Integration”, Timothy A. Byrnes ve Peter J. Katzenstein (der.), Religion in An Expanding Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006, s. 74. Comission of European Communities, “A People’s Europe: Reports from the Ad Hoc Committee,” Bulletin of the European Communities 7/85, 1985. Comission of European Communities, “Copenhagen European Council”, Bulletin of the European Communities 6/94, 1993, s. 7-26. Comission of European Communities, “Negotiating Framework”, (3 Ekim 2005), (19 Kasım 2009), s. 1. Norman DAVİES, Avrupa Tarihi, Mehmet Ali Kılıçbay (Çev. Ed.), Ankara, İmge Kitabevi, 2006, s. 1206. Gerard DELANTY ve Chris RUMFORD, Rethinking Europe, London, Routledge, 2005, s. 28. EP-CIA (European Parliament Committee on Institutional Affairs), Report on the Amsterdam Treaty, Strasbourg, 5 November 1997, s. 15. Euractiv, “AB-Türkiye Müzakere Süreci”,, 16 Aralık 2009.
  5. EU Agency for Fundamental Rights, Report on Racism and Xenophobia in the Member States of the EU, 2007,, (26 Mayıs 2010).
  6. European Commission, Eurobarometer 63, (Eylül 2005), http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb63/eb63_en.pdf, (14 Eylül 2009).
  7. European Commission, Eurobarometer 64, (Aralık 2005), http://ec.europa