Journals / International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies / 2018 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

VALIDATION OF CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: USERS EXPERIENCES

Pages
143–156
Publication Date
2018-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings revealed that the information in the CMS was relevant and that all the activities in the eLearning unit were performed as expected.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A content management system is ubiquitous and trouble-free in managing accurate, up-to-date, easily accessible and systematically organised information.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A mixed methods research approach incorporated a questionnaire and a series of focus group interviews to explore the perceptions of the e-Learning officials.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings revealed that the information in the CMS was relevant and that all the activities in the eLearning unit were performed as expected.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Digital · e-Learning · content management system

Abstract

A content management system is ubiquitous and trouble-free in managing accurate, up-to-date, easily accessible and systematically organised information. The main aim of this study was to explore the perceptions of the e-Learning officials regarding the quality of content populated in the content management system (CMS) of the e-Learning unit of Gauteng Department of Education (GDE). This study used the Information Systems Success Model (ISSM) to validate user experiences. A mixed methods research approach incorporated a questionnaire and a series of focus group interviews to explore the perceptions of the e-Learning officials. The study used convenience sampling to select a sample of 15 e-Learning managers (Deputy Chief Education Specialists) and 30 eLearning subordinates (Senior Education Specialists). The findings revealed that the information in the CMS was relevant and that all the activities in the eLearning unit were performed as expected. Furthermore, the instructions to navigate the system were clear. This study gives a better insight into how the quality of information within a system is understood during development and evaluation. This contribution adds to the literature on e-Learning and could be used as a guideline for ensuring the quality of information in systems content development.

🔖

Cite This Article

MAKGATO-KHUNOU, P., MOKOENA, S. (2018). VALIDATION OF CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: USERS EXPERIENCES. International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 143–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/993482

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Al-Samarraie, H., Teo, T. and Abbas, M., 2013. Can structured representation enhance students' thinking skills for better understanding of E-learning content? Computers & Education, 69, pp.463-473.
  2. Babbie, E. and Mouton, J., 2007. Qualitative methods of data sampling. The Practice of Social Research, 7, pp.187-193.
  3. Bagarukayo, E. and Kalema, B., 2015. Evaluation of eLearning usage in South African universities: A critical review. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 11(2). Brink, H. 2010. Fundamentals of research methodology for health care professionals. 2nd ed. Cape Town: Juta. Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. 2007. Research methods in education. 6th ed. London; New York: Routledge Falmer. Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D., 2017. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. Danaj, L., Dumi, A., Zejneli, I. and Çelo, E., 2013. The improvement of capacity of administrative and local government using the strategic planning of E-Learning in Albania. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, pp.1-9.
  4. DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R., 2003. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of management information systems, 19(4), pp.9-30.
  5. DeLone, W.H. and Mclean, E.R., 2004. Measuring e-commerce success:Applying the DeLone & McLean information systems success model. International Journal of electronic commerce, 9(1), pp.31-47.
  6. Detlor, B., Hupfer, M.E., Ruhi, U., and Zhao, L., 2013. Information quality and community municipal portal use. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1),pp.23-32.
  7. Gagne, R.M., Wager, W.W., Golas, K.C., Keller, J.M. and Russell, J.D., 2005. Principles of instructional design. Performance Improvement, 44(2), pp.44-46.
  8. Gorla, N., Somers, T.M. and Wong, B., 2010. Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(3), pp.207-228.
  9. Hong, J.C., Tai, K.H., Hwang, M.Y., Kuo, Y.C. and Chen, J.S., 2017. Internet cognitive failure relevant to users' satisfaction with content and interface design to reflect continuance intention to use a government e-learning system. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, pp.353-362. Joomla.Org. 2013. Joomla downloads. Available at: Accessed 13 March 2014. Kaluža, M., Vukelić, B. and Rojko, T., 2016. Content management system security. Zbornik Veleučilišta u Rijeci, 4(1), pp.29-44.
  10. Lim, C.H. and Kim, K.J., 2014. Information servic