Journals / International Journal of Business and Management Studies / 2011 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

NATURE AND EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION IN INTERCULTURAL BUSINESS NEGOTIATIONS

Pages
103–114
Publication Date
2011-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Drawing on concepts from several disciplines, our intention in this paper is to clarify the aspects and elements of the causal relationship between the nature and exchange of information and conflict in intercultural negotiations in order to uncover new hypotheses for experimental research

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The influence of culture on international business negotiations is recognized by most of the specialists and researchers in the field.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Negotiation is a specific form of communication in which the parties enter into deliberately, each with supposedly clear aims and goals as well as a mutual dependency on a decision that will be taken at the end of the confrontation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Drawing on concepts from several disciplines, our intention in this paper is to clarify the aspects and elements of the causal relationship between the nature and exchange of information and conflict in intercultural negotiations in order to uncover new hypotheses for experimental research
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:negotiation · culture · information

Abstract

The influence of culture on international business negotiations is recognized by most of the specialists and researchers in the field. A more important question is to what extent and what are the consequences in agreement making. Personal values, beliefs, attitudes, behaviours and decisions too are largely influenced and determined by our own culture, but the level of its influence on the negotiation process is difficult to estimate. Negotiation is a specific form of communication in which the parties enter into deliberately, each with supposedly clear aims and goals as well as a mutual dependency on a decision that will be taken at the end of the confrontation. Communication will have a strong influence over the development of conflict, in particular the nature of the information used and the expectations in terms of feedback. Indeed, the information transmitted during the process includes unconscious signals and the underlying affects carried on will considerably influence it, particularly regarding the level and nature of the exchange. When confronted with difficulties, negotiators have a tendency to use pressure-tactics such as threats which will increase the level of conflict and reduce the chances of reaching an agreement. In an intercultural context the expectations of each party regarding information ( in particular the interpretation of what is a useful or relevant) may lead to multiple misunderstandings and so increase the level of conflict between the parties. Drawing on concepts from several disciplines, our intention in this paper is to clarify the aspects and elements of the causal relationship between the nature and exchange of information and conflict in intercultural negotiations in order to uncover new hypotheses for experimental research

🔖

Cite This Article

Alavoine, C., Batazzi, C. (2011). NATURE AND EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION IN INTERCULTURAL BUSINESS NEGOTIATIONS. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 103–114. https://ajindex.com/articles/993332

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Adair Wendi, Brett Jeanne, Lempereur Alain, Okumura Tetsushi et al (2004), "Culture and Negotiation Strategy", Negotiation Journal, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp.87−111. Axelrod Robert (1997),
  2. The Complexity of Cooperation, Agent-based Models of Competition and Collaboration, Princeton University Press.
  3. Butler John K. (1999), "Trust Expectations, Information Sharing, Climate of Trust, and Negotiation Effectiveness and Efficiency", Group and Organization Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp.217−238. Dupont Christophe, Faure Guy-Olivier (1991), "The negotiation process", (in Kremenyuk Victor A. (ed.), International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues) Jossey Bass Publishers, San Francisco, pp. 40-57.
  4. Fisher R. (1999), "Negotiating power: Getting and using influence", (in Breslin William J., Rubin Jeffrey Z., Negotiation Theory and Practice) The Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Mass., 5th edition, pp.127-140.
  5. Ghauri Pervez, Usunier Jean Claude (2003),
  6. International Business Negotiations, International Business and Management series, Pergamon / Elsevier Science, 2nd edition. Gibbons Pamela, Bradac James J., Busch Jon D. (1992), "The Role of Language in Negotiations: Threats and Promises", (in: Putnam Linda L., Roloff M. E., Communication and Negotiation) Sage Publications, Newbury Park. CA, pp. 156- Graham John L. (1996), "Vis-à-vis international business negotiations", (in Ghauri Pervez, Usunier Jean Claude, International Business Negotiations) Pergamon / Elsevier Science, pp. 69-90.
  7. Johannessen J-A., Olaisen J., Olsen B. (1997), "Information management in negotiations: The conditions under which it could be expected that the negotiation partners substitute a competitive definition of the situation for a cooperative one", International journal of Information Management, Vol.17, n°3, pp. 153-168. Kremenyuk Victor A. (ed.) (2002), International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues, Jossey Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 2nd edition. Lax David A., Sebenius James K. (1986), The manager as negotiator: bargaining for cooperation and competitive gain, New York: Free Press.
  8. Murnighan Keith J., Babcock Linda, Thompson Leigh, Pillutla Madan (1999), "The Information Dilemma in Negotiations: Effects of Experience, Incentives, and Integrative Potential", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol., No. 4, pp.313−339. Olekalns Mara, Smith Philip L. (2007), "Loose with the Truth: Predicting Deception in Negotiation", Journal of Business Ethics, Vol