These perceptions of leadership characteristics differentiate in the view of gender and being effective, being even-tempered and being free from bias are demanded by two gender groups with high density
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Implicit leadership means that different leader profiles are shaped in minds individually.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Finally by using open-ended questionnaire, 29 leadership characteristics with different frequencies are found.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These perceptions of leadership characteristics differentiate in the view of gender and being effective, being even-tempered and being free from bias are demanded by two gender groups with high density
Implicit leadership means that different leader profiles are shaped in minds individually. The aim of this study is searching perception of leadership characteristics of defense industry workers and also finding the differences of perceptions up to the gender. Finally by using open-ended questionnaire, 29 leadership characteristics with different frequencies are found. These perceptions of leadership characteristics differentiate in the view of gender and being effective, being even-tempered and being free from bias are demanded by two gender groups with high density
TABAK, A., ÇELİK, M., BURMAOĞLU, S. (2011). A STUDY ON THE PERCEPTION OF THE LEADERSHIP CHARACTERISTIC BY THE EMPLOYEES ON THE CONTEXT OF IMPLICIT LEADERSHIP THEORY. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 23–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/993272
Brodbeck, F.C. et.al. (2000). Cultural Variation of Leadership Prototypes Across European Countries, Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, (1), 1-29.
Eden, D. & Leviatan. V. (1975). Implicit Leadership Theory as a Determinant of Factor Structure Underlying Supervisory Behavior Scales, Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 736-741
Engle, E.M. & Lord. R.G.(1997).
Implicit Theories, Self-Schemas, And Leader Member Exchange, Academy of Management Journal, 40-4, 988-1010.
Epitropaki, O. & Martin, R. (2005). From Ideal to Real: A Longitudinal Study of the Role of Implicit Leadership Theories on Leader-Member Exchanges and Employee Outcomes, Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 659-767.
Felfe, J. & Petersen, L.E.(2007). Romance of Leadership and Management Decision Making, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, (1), 1-24.
Hunt, J.G., Boal K.B. & Sorenson. R.L.(1990). Top Management Leadership: Inside the Black Box, Leadership Quarterly, 1, 41-65.
Keller, T. (1999). Images Of The Familiar: Individual Differences And Implicit Leadership Theories, Leadership Quarterly, 10(3), 590-607.
Keller, T. (2003). Parental Images as a Guide to Leadership Sensemaking: an Attachment Perspective on Implicit Leadership Theories, Leadership Quarterly,, 141-160.
Konrad, E.(2000). Implicit Leadership Theories in Eastern and Western Europe, Social Science Information, 39(2), 335-347.
Lord, R.G., Foti R.J. & De Vader C.L. (1984). A Test of Leadership Categorization Theory: Internal Structure, Information Processing, and Leadership Perceptions, Organizational Behavior And Human Performance, 34, 378 Lord, R.G., Foti R.J. & Phillips J.S. (1982). A theory of leadership categorization. J.G. Hunt, U. Sekaran ve C.A. Schriesheim, (Ed.), Leadership: Beyond establishment views, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Pres. Paris, L.D. (2004). The Effects Of Gender And Culture On Implicit Leadership Theories: A Cross-Cultural Study, Academy of Management Best Conference Paper, 2004.
Rosch, E.(1978).
Principles of Categorization, E. Rosch, B.B. Lloyd (Ed.), Cognition and Categorization, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 28-48.
Wilkermaier F. (2003)
An Introduction to MDS, Sound Quality Research Unit. Yenidoğan Gürçaylılar, T. (2008) “Pazarlama Araştırmalarında Çok Boyutlu Ölçekleme Analizi: Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Marka Algısı Üzerine Bir Araştırma” Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi (15), 138-169.
Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in Organizations (5th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prent