SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Business and Management Studies / 2014 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

THE IMPACT OF EMPLOYEE-ORGANIZATION RELATIONSHIP ON INDIVIDUALS’ BEHAVIORAL OUTCOMES OF TASK-RELATED PERFORMANCE, CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE AND INTENTION TO TURNOVER: AN EVALUATION WITH SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY

Seçil BAL TAŞTAN
Pages
42–53
Publication Date
2014-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The implications of research and theory are discussed and future research suggestions are identified

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to examine the impact of employee-organization relationship (EOR) on individuals’ behavioral outcomes with the reference explanation of social exchange theory.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Among the behavioral outcomes of the employees, task performance, contextual performance and turnover intention are identified.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The implications of research and theory are discussed and future research suggestions are identified
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Employee-Organization Relationship · Task-Related Performance · Contextual Performance

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the impact of employee-organization relationship (EOR) on individuals’ behavioral outcomes with the reference explanation of social exchange theory. Among the behavioral outcomes of the employees, task performance, contextual performance and turnover intention are identified. The analyses reported that EOR significantly and positively impacted both task-related performance and contextual performance, however significantly and negatively impacted intention to turnover. The implications of research and theory are discussed and future research suggestions are identified

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞTAN, S. B. (2014). THE IMPACT OF EMPLOYEE-ORGANIZATION RELATIONSHIP ON INDIVIDUALS’ BEHAVIORAL OUTCOMES OF TASK-RELATED PERFORMANCE, CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE AND INTENTION TO TURNOVER: AN EVALUATION WITH SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 42–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/993158

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aryee, S., Sun, L. Y. and Zhou, Q. (2009), “Employee-organization relationship, psychological ownership and contextual performance: a social exchange perspective”. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2009, No. 1, pp. 1-6).
  2. Academy of Management. Audenaert, M., Vanderstraeten, A. and Buyens, D. (2012), Mutual investment EOR: a conceptual model of how and when it is functional. In 12th Social innovation for competitiveness organisational performance and human excellence (EURAM-2012).
  3. Bell, S. J. and Menguc, B. (2002), “The employee-organization relationship, OCBs, and superior service quality”, Journal of Retailing, Vol.78, No.2, pp.131-146.
  4. Blau, P. M. (1964), Exchange and power in social life. New York, Wiley. Bordin, C., Bartram, T. and Casimir, G. (2007), “The antecedents and consequences of psychological empowerment among Singaporean IT employees”, Management Research News, Vol.30, No.1, pp.34-46.
  5. Borman, W. C. and Motowidlo, S. J. (1997), “Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning of personnel selection research”, Human Performance, Vol.10, pp.99-109.
  6. Broom, G. M., Casey, S. and Ritchey, J. (1997), “Toward a concept and theory of organization-public relationships”, Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol.9, No.2, pp.83-98.
  7. Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D. and Klesh, J. (1979), Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. and Shore, L. M. (2007), “The employee–organization relationship: Where do we go from here?”, Human Resource Management Review, Vol.17, No.2, pp.166-179.
  8. Cutlip, S. M., Center, A. H., and Broom, G. M. (1985), Effective Public Relations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Duanxu, W., Tsui, A. S., Yichi, Z. and Li, M. (2003), “Employment relationships and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging economy”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.24, No.5, pp.511-535.
  9. Ehrhart, M. G., Bliese, P. D. and Thomas, J. L. (2006), “Unit-level OCB and unit effectiveness: Examining the incremental effect of helping behavior”, Human Performance, Vol.19, No.2, pp.159-173.
  10. Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C. and Lin, S. C. (1997), “Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and OCB in Chinese society”, Administrative Science Quarterly, pp.421-444.
  11. Farh, J. L., Hackett, R. D. and Liang, J. (2007), “Individual-level cultural values as moderators of organizational support–employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance a