SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal Of Biology Education / 2016 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE ANIMATION AND 3-D MODEL IN TEACHING PHOTOSYNTHESIS

Flor Torayno Capuno
Pages
1–1
Publication Date
2016-07-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results revealed that there is a significant difference in the students’ over-all performance, knowledge and understanding levels of assessment of both groups but cannot enhance the process and performance levels of assessment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study is a quasi-experimental method of research involving the making of alternative animation and 3D models as instructional materials in teaching photosynthesis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main objective of the study was to find out whether this type of instructional material can enhance the academic performance of the students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results revealed that there is a significant difference in the students’ over-all performance, knowledge and understanding levels of assessment of both groups but cannot enhance the process and performance levels of assessment.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study is a quasi-experimental method of research involving the making of alternative animation and 3D models as instructional materials in teaching photosynthesis. The main objective of the study was to find out whether this type of instructional material can enhance the academic performance of the students. The experimental group was exposed to the alternative animation which illustrates the light and dark reaction and the 3D model chloroplast while the control group was exposed to the 2D model of these structures which are indispensable in the topic photosynthesis. Constructivism approach is used as a teaching strategy specifically the 5E model in teaching for both groups. Two sections of Grade 8 were selected namely SSC- RNA and St. Therese. The students were randomly selected to be assigned as experimental and control group. The groups were given the teacher-made assessment composed of four levels: Knowledge, Process, Understanding and Performance. The learning outcomes were statistically treated using frequency and percentage distribution and independent t-test. Results revealed that there is a significant difference in the students’ over-all performance, knowledge and understanding levels of assessment of both groups but cannot enhance the process and performance levels of assessment.

🔖

Cite This Article

Capuno, F. T. (2016). THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE ANIMATION AND 3-D MODEL IN TEACHING PHOTOSYNTHESIS. International Journal Of Biology Education, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 1–1. https://ajindex.com/articles/993014

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Agun, I. (1992) Importance of Audio Visual Instruction. West African Journal of Education. 20(2). Amir, R., & Tamir, P. (1994). In-depth Analysis of Misconceptions as a Basis for Developing Research-based Remedial Instruction: the Case of Photosynthesis. The American Biology Teacher,56(2), 94–100.
  2. Anderson, C.W., Sheldon, T.H. & DuBay, J. (1990). The Effect of Instruction on College Nonmajors’ Conceptions of Photosynthesis and Respiration. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(8), 761–776.
  3. Andersson, B. (2008). To Understand School Science. Research Findings and New Ideas. Student litterature. Elanders Hungary Kft. Archambault, R. (1964). John Dewey on education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  4. Armstrong, T.(1994). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). Ausman, B., Lin, H., Kidwai, K., Munyofu, M., Swain, J., & Dwyer, F. (2008). Effect of Prerequisite Knowledge on the Effectiveness of Animated Instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media.Vol.35(3). Bagaforo, N and Nieto, R., (2001). PCs for Students. Sunstar Davao. Retreived: July 24, 2014 from: http://www.sunstar.com.ph/davao/weekend/pcs-students
  5. Bahar, M., Johnstone, A.H., & Hansell, M.H. (1999). Revisiting Learning Difficulties in Biology.Journal of Biological Education, 33(2), 84-86
  6. Barak, M., Ashkar, T., Dori, Y. (2011). Teaching Science via Animated Movies: Its Effect on Students' Learning Outcomes and Motivation. Journal of Computers & Education. Volume 56 Issue 3 Pages 839-846. Bruner,J.(1960).The Process of Education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  7. Buchanan, M., Carter, W., Cowgill, L., Hurley, D., Lewis, S.,MacLeod, J., Melton, T., Moore, J., Pessah, M.,Roberson, M.,Robertson, T., Smith, M., and Vandenplas, M.(2005). Using 3D Animations to Teach Intracellular Signal Transduction Mechanisms: Taking the Arrows out of Cells. Journal of Veterinary.(32)1 No. 72. Canal, P. (1999). Photosynthesis And ‘Inverse Respiration’ In Plants: An Inevitable Misconception? International Journal of Science education. 21: 363-371.
  8. Cobb, P. (1991). Reconstructing Elementary School Mathematics. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, Vol. 13. pp.3-22.
  9. Copolo, C.F., & Hounshell, P.B. (1995). Using Three-Dimensional Models To Teach Molecular Structures In High School Chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(4), 295 -305. Daniels, H. (ed.) (1996) An Introduction to Vygotsky. London: Routledge,. Dew