SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Temporal Variation of Carbon Storage Quantities

Karbon Depolama Miktarlarının Zamansal Değişimi

Melih KOCAMAN
Birsen DURKAYA
Pages
591–603
Publication Date
2020-08-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Parallel results were also seen in broad leaf and mixed stand types.In the allometric equation method, since the equations developed based on the diameter are used for tree species, it is thought to give more results than the other method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The biomass and carbon stock capacities of Bolu Forest Regional Directorate, Aladağ Forest Management Directorate, Demirciler Forest Management Directorate's forests between 1986-1995 and 2009-2018 were calculated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is mapped to the ArcGISTM 10.3 environment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Parallel results were also seen in broad leaf and mixed stand types.In the allometric equation method, since the equations developed based on the diameter are used for tree species, it is thought to give more results than the other method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Allometric equation · BEF · carbon stock

Abstract

The biomass and carbon stock capacities of Bolu Forest Regional Directorate, Aladağ Forest Management Directorate, Demirciler Forest Management Directorate's forests between 1986-1995 and 2009-2018 were calculated. Biomass and carbon storage amounts of forests were determined according to Allometric Biomass Method (USA) and Biomass Expansion Factor (BEF) method. It is mapped to the ArcGISTM 10.3 environment. While the carbon value of 103.20 ton/ha was determined by the US method in the coniferous stands during the 1986-1995 Plan period, it was determined as 92.18 ton/ha by the BEF method. In the 2009-2018 plan period, 127.63 tons/ha of carbon was calculated with the US method and 122.43 tons /ha of carbon with the BEF method. Parallel results were also seen in broad leaf and mixed stand types.In the allometric equation method, since the equations developed based on the diameter are used for tree species, it is thought to give more results than the other method.

Özet

Bolu Orman Bölge Müdürlüğü, Aladağ Orman İşletme Müdürlüğü, Demirciler Orman İşletme Şefliği’nin ormanlarının 1986-1995 ve 2009-2018 yıllarına ait biyokütle ve karbon tutma kapasiteleri hesaplanmıştır. Ormanlarının biyokütle ve karbon depolama miktarları Allometrik Biyokütle Yöntemi (ABD) ve Biyokütle Genişletme Faktörü (BEF) yöntemine göre belirlenmiştir. ArcGIS sürüm 10.3TM ortamında haritalandırılmıştır. Planlama biriminde 1986-1995 Plan döneminde iğne yapraklı meşcerelerde ABD yöntemiyle 103,20 ton/ha karbon değeri belirlenirken, BEF yöntemiyle 92,18 ton/ha olarak belirlenmiştir. 2009-2018 plan döneminde ise yöntemler ABD yöntemi 127,63 ton/ha ve BEF yöntemi 122,43 ton/ha karbon hesabı çıkarmıştır. Geniş yapraklı ve karışık meşcere tiplerinde de paralel sonuçlar görülmüştür. Allometrik denklem yönteminde, ağaç türleri için, çapa bağlı geliştirilen denklemler kullanıldığından diğer yönteme göre daha sonuçlar verdiği düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOCAMAN, M., DURKAYA, B. (2020). Temporal Variation of Carbon Storage Quantities. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 591–603. https://ajindex.com/articles/99277

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Anon (1986). Orman Genel Müdürlüğü, Bolu Orman Bölge Müdürlüğü, Bolu Orman İşletme Müdürlüğü, Demirciler Orman İşletme Şefliği Orman Amenajman Planı 1986-1995
  2. Anon, (2009). Orman Genel Müdürlüğü, Bolu Orman Bölge Müdürlüğü, Aladağ Orman İşletme Müdürlüğü, Demirciler Orman İşletme Şefliği Orman Amenajman Planı 2009-2018
  3. Asan, Ü. (1995). Global iklim değişimi ve Türkiye ormanlarında karbon birikimi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 45(1-2), 23-38
  4. Asan, Ü., Destan, S., Özkan, U. Y. (2002). İstanbul korularının karbon depolama, oksijen üretimi ve toz tutma kapasitesinin kestirilmesi. Orman Amenajamanında Kavramsal Açılımlar ve Yeni Hedefler Sempozyumu, Bildiriler Kitabı, İstanbul, Türkiye, 194-202
  5. Backéus, S.,Wikström, P., Lämås, T. (2005). A model for regional analysis of carbon sequestration and timber production. Forest Ecology and Management, 216(1-3), 28-40
  6. Baker, J. S., Wade, C. M., Sohngen, B. L., Ohrel, S., Fawcett, A. A. (2019). Potential complementarity between forest carbon sequestration incentives and biomass energy expansion. Energy Policy, 126, 391-401
  7. Brown, S. (2002). Measuring carbon in forests: current status and future challenges. Environmental Pollution, 116(3), 363-372
  8. Chave, J., Andalo, C., Brown, S., Cairns, M. A., Chambers, J. Q., Eamus, D.,. & Lescure, J. P. (2005). Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia, 145(1), 87-99
  9. Chave, J., Réjou‐Méchain, M., Búrquez, A., Chidumayo, E., Colgan, M. S., Delitti, W. B.,., Henry, M. (2014). Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Global Change Biology, 20(10), 3177-3190. 10.Coomes, D. A., Allen, R. B., Scott, N. A., Goulding, C., Beets, P. (2002). Designing systems to monitor carbon stocks in forests and shrublands. Forest Ecology and Management, 164(1-3), 89-108. 11.Dewar, R. C., Cannell, M. G. (1992). Carbon sequestration in the trees, products and soils of forest plantations: an analysis using UK examples. Tree Physiology, 11(1), 49-71. 12.Dhakal, B., Kattel, R. R. (2019). Effects of global changes on ecosystems services of multiple natural resources in mountain agricultural landscapes. Science of the Total Environment, 676, 665-682. 13.Durkaya, B. (1998). Zonguldak Orman Bölge Müdürlüğü Meşe Meşcerelerinin Biyokütle Tablolarının Düzenlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 110
  10. Durkaya, A.,