Journals / Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Avrupa Birliği’nin Terörizmle Mücadele Stratejisi: Yeni Bir Bütünleşme Alanı Mı?

Pages
85–118
Publication Date
2012-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In terms of determining the limits of the scope of the subject, the attention will be focused specifically on the area of internal security among various policy-areas.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The European Union’s EU counter-terrorism strategy enhances the cooperation and coordination among Member States.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims, on the one hand to comprehend the EU’s counter-terrorism strategy, while seeking an answer for the question of whether counter-terrorism strategy is a new area of integration within the EU on the other hand.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In terms of determining the limits of the scope of the subject, the attention will be focused specifically on the area of internal security among various policy-areas.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Terörizm · AB Terörizmle Mücadele Stratejisi · Eylem Halindeki AB İç Güvenlik Stratejisi

Abstract

The European Union’s EU counter-terrorism strategy enhances the cooperation and coordination among Member States. This study aims, on the one hand to comprehend the EU’s counter-terrorism strategy, while seeking an answer for the question of whether counter-terrorism strategy is a new area of integration within the EU on the other hand. In this study, the concept of integration is referred as the process of delegation of authority in a particular policy-area to a higher authority by the states of a specific geographical region. Methodology of the study is based on the critical analysis of the strategy documents that have been adopted within the EU and well as the academic literature on the subject matter. In terms of determining the limits of the scope of the subject, the attention will be focused specifically on the area of internal security among various policy-areas.

Özet

AB’nin terörizmle mücadele stratejisi üye devletlerin işbirliği ve eşgüdüm çalışmalarını artırmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, bir yandan Avrupa Birliği’nin terörizmle mücadele stratejisi anlaşılmaya çalışılırken, bir yandan da terörizmle mücadele stratejisinin AB içerisinde yeni bir bütünleşme alanı olup olmadığı sorusuna yanıt aranmaktadır. Bütünleşme, belirli bir coğrafi bölgedeki devletlerin daha üst bir otoriteye belli bir alanda yetki aktarma süreci anlamında kullanılmaktadır. Yöntem olarak, AB bünyesinde benimsenen strateji belgelerinin ve konuya ilişkin akademik yazının kritik bir analizi yapılmaktadır. Konunun sınırlılığını belirleyebilmek adına, terörizmle mücadele stratejisinin içerdiği çeşitli politika alanlarından iç güvenlik alanına odaklanılmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

TANGÖR, B., SAYIN, S. (2012). Avrupa Birliği’nin Terörizmle Mücadele Stratejisi: Yeni Bir Bütünleşme Alanı Mı?. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 85–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/9927

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data by air carriers to the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (2007 PNR Agreement), Official Journal of the European Union, L 204/18, 4 August 2007. Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of Financial Messaging Data from the European Union to the United States for the purposes of the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program, Official Journal of the European Union, L 195/5, 27 July 2010. Javier Argomaniz, “Post-9/11 institutionalisation of European Union counter- terrorism: emergence, acceleration and inertia”, European Security, Cilt 18, Sayı 2, June 2009, s. 151-172. Thierry Balzacq, “The Policy Tools of Securitization: Information Exchange, EU Foreign and Interior Policies”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Cilt 46, Sayı 1, 2008, s. 75-100. Sanem Baykal, “Avrupa Birliğinde Yetki Sorunu ve Lizbon Antlaşması”, Belgin Akçay, Sevilay Kahraman, Sanem Baykal (Ed.), Avrupa Birliği’nin Güncel Sorunları ve Gelişmeler, Ankara, Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2008, s. 15-48. Raphael Bossong, “The Action Plan on Combating Terrorism: A Flawed Instrument of EU Security Governance”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Cilt 46, Sayı 1, 2008, s.27-48. Hakkı Büyükbaş, “Avrupa Güvenlik Strateji Belgesi ve Türkiye”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt 61, Sayı 1, 2006, s. 37-66. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2010/C 83/02), Official Journal of the European Union, C 83/389, 30 March 2010. Argomaniz, op.cit., s. 165-168. Commission Decision of 30 November 2009 determining the first regions for the start of operations of the Visa Information System (VIS) (notified under document C(2009) 8542), Official Journal of the European Union, L 23/62, 27 January 2010. Convention based on Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention), Official Journal, C 316, 27 November 1995. Rik Coolsaet, “EU Counterterrorism Strategy: Value Added or Chimera?”, International Affairs, Cilt 86, Sayı 4, 2010, s. 857-873. Council Decision of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime (2002/187/JHA), Official Journal of the European Communities, L 63/1, 6 March 2002. Council Decision of 8 June 2004 establishing the Visa Information System (VIS) (2004/512/EC), Official Journal