SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

A BRIEF OVERVIEW ON EU INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE FROM FOUNDATION TO LISBON

Zerrin SAVAŞAN
Pages
61–84
Publication Date
2012-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the conclusion part, it summarizes the main points of its analysis

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article aims to examine EU institutional change focusing on four main political institutions the European Commission, the European Parliament, the Council of the EU and the European Council and three EU Treaties Treaties of Amsterdam, Nice and Lisbon .
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this respect, firstly, it gives information briefly on EU institutional structure existing from the EU’s foundation to the acceptance of Treaty of Amsterdam ToA .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the conclusion part, it summarizes the main points of its analysis
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kurumsal Değişim · Politik Kurumlar · AB Antlaşmaları

Abstract

This article aims to examine EU institutional change focusing on four main political institutions the European Commission, the European Parliament, the Council of the EU and the European Council and three EU Treaties Treaties of Amsterdam, Nice and Lisbon . In this respect, firstly, it gives information briefly on EU institutional structure existing from the EU’s foundation to the acceptance of Treaty of Amsterdam ToA . Secondly, it studies on the amendments and developments regarding the EU institutions in the ToA. Thirdly, it analyses the institutional reforms brought by the Treaty of Nice ToN . Then, it evaluates what the Treaty of Lisbon brings for EU’s institutional future. In the conclusion part, it summarizes the main points of its analysis

Özet

Bu makale, AB kurumsal değişimini dört ana politik kurum Avrupa Komisyonu, Avrupa Parlamentosu, AB Konseyi ve Avrupa Konseyi ve üç AB Antlaşması’na odaklanarak incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda, ilk olarak, AB’nin kuruluşundan Amsterdam Antlaşması’nın kabulüne kadar varolan AB kurumsal yapısı üzerine kısaca bilgi vermektedir. İkinci olarak, Amsterdam Antlaşmasındaki AB kurumları ile ilgili değişiklikler ve gelişmeler üzerinde çalışmaktadır. Üçüncü olarak, Nice Antlaşması ile getirilen kurumsal reformları analiz etmektedir. Daha sonra, Lizbon Antlaşmasının AB’nin kurumsal geleceği için ne getirdiğini değerlendirmektedir. Sonuç bölümünde ise, analizin ana noktalarını özetlemektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

SAVAŞAN, Z. (2012). A BRIEF OVERVIEW ON EU INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE FROM FOUNDATION TO LISBON. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 61–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/9926

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. A. Agh, “Completing Membership and Post-accession Crisis in the New Member States”, EU-CONSENT Project Publications, 2007. http://www.eu-consent.net/library/deliverables/D12b_Team_5.pdf., (6 May 2009). A.Faber, “Theoretical Approaches to EU Deepening and Widening: A Multi- disciplinary Overview and Some Tentative (Hypo)theses”, EU-CONSENT Project Publications, 2006. http://www.euconsent.net/library/brx061012/WP%20II%20III%20Paperredefiningconc epts.pdf., (6 May 2009) Alan Mayhew, “Enlargement of the European Union: An Analysis of the Negotiations with the Central and Eastern European Candidate Countries”, SEI Working Paper, No 39, 2000. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/sei/documents/wp39.pdfNo. 39, (8 May 2009).
  2. C.Preston, Enlargement and Integration in the European Union, London, Routledge Publications, 1997.
  3. D.R.Cameron, The Future of Europe, Integration and Enlargement, London, Routledge Publications, 2004. D.R. Cameron, “The Challenges of Accession”, East European Politics and Societies, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2003 Geoffrey Edwards, “Reforming the Union's Instititional Framework: A New EU Obligation?”, Hillion, C.(ed) EU Enlargement: A Legal Approach: Essays in European Law, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2004 F. Schimmelfenning and U.Sedelmeier, “Theorizing EU Enlargement: Research, Focus, Hypotheses and the State of Research”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol.9, No.4, 2002 H. Grabbe, “What the New Member States Bring into the European Union”, N. Nugent, N.(ed), The Government and Politics of the European Union, Hampshire, Palgrave Publications, 2006.
  4. N.Nugent, European Union Enlargement, Hampshire, Palgrave Publications, 2004. N.Nugent, “The Unfolding of the 10+2 Enlargement Round”, N.Nugent(ed), The Government and Politics of the European Union, Hampshire, Palgrave Publications, 2006. P.S. Christoffersen, “From Rome to Rome: Two Decades of Constitutional Change in the European Union”, M.Herslund and R.Samson, Unity in Diversity: Europe and the European Union: Enlargement and Constitutional Treaty, Copenhagen, Copenhagen Business School Press, 2005 Peter Van Elsuwege and An. Vermeersch, “Institutional Reform in the European Union; A Difficult Balancing Act”, A.Ott and K.Inglis (eds.) The Constitution for Europe and an Enlarging European Union: Unity in Diversity?, The Netherlands; Europa Law Publishing, 2005. S.Piedrafita, “In Spite of the Costs? Moral Constraints on Spain’s Enlargement Policy”, H.Sjursen(ed), Questioning EU Enlargement: Europe in Search of Identity